Giant Midget
Aka - rooney_10119
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Messages
- 5,220
City aren’t usually on the back foot like they were at the end today. Ederson is the best GK for them because of what he adds to their game.
Yeah I am sure Pep is fine with it. He had his best success with Valdes in goal.Great with the ball. His actual goalkeeping, eye test and stats say he's very average though. I guess they don't mind the trade off as most teams don't get near them.
I don't think he is, I think his shot stopping and positioning is pretty average, if he wasn't as good with his feet I'm not sure he'd be paying in the premium. I honestly expect Muric to be #1 within 2 seasons.top, top keeper
You seem to be missing the white text..I don't think he is, I think his shot stopping and positioning is pretty average, if he wasn't as good with his feet I'm not sure he'd be paying in the premium. I honestly expect Muric to be #1 within 2 seasons.
The irony being if he had went for that with his feet he'd have saved it.Yeah but he's excellent with his feet.
In guessing because Son’s shot squeezed in underneath him.Excellent keeper.
Wait why was this bumped?
Saw it after I posted.In guessing because Son’s shot squeezed in underneath him.
Yeah for sure. I think it was in relation to the UCL match thread where Edersons distribution was getting creamed overSaw it after I posted.
Still an excellent keeper.
He'll regret it when he's like 60.That tatoo on his neck. What was he thinking.
Both Delph and Gundogan fecked that up. Slightly harsh on Ederson IMO, close distance with decent power. He shouldn't have gotten the shot away to begin with.I'm blaming Gundogan more than Delph or Ederson
That is actually the one thing that puts me off getting a tatoo. It looks cool when you are young. Not so cool when you are seventy.He'll regret it when he's like 60.
I don't think he is, I think his shot stopping and positioning is pretty average, if he wasn't as good with his feet I'm not sure he'd be paying in the premium. I honestly expect Muric to be #1 within 2 seasons.
It is with the benefit of hindsight, yeah.Why.. just why do keepers always try get down to shots less than a foot away from them at ground level? The reaction time to make contact with the ball with your foot vs being 6'2+ and trying to get your body down to ground level falling without being able to force yourself down (no additional force other than your body weight) is a no brainer.
Cech conceded many goals like this too. It's baffling, just use your feet.
Exactly! It's terrible goal keeping and poor technique.Why.. just why do keepers always try get down to shots less than a foot away from them at ground level? The reaction time to make contact with the ball with your foot vs being 6'2+ and trying to get your body down to ground level falling without being able to force yourself down (no additional force other than your body weight) is a no brainer.
Cech conceded many goals like this too. It's baffling, just use your feet.
Yep, just kick the thing awayWhy.. just why do keepers always try get down to shots less than a foot away from them at ground level? The reaction time to make contact with the ball with your foot vs being 6'2+ and trying to get your body down to ground level falling without being able to force yourself down (no additional force other than your body weight) is a no brainer.
Cech conceded many goals like this too. It's baffling, just use your feet.
No probably about it, he WOULD have saved it. A fine example is 5v5 astro turf with your mates. If a shot it hammered that close to the goalie 9/10 times they'll save it with their leg because no one has any type of goalkeeper training because their mind set isn't ''get a hand to it''.He could have saved it but that's different from if he should. The shot was hard and from a short distance but had he used his legs instead of diving down he probably would have saved it.
.