Or just reiterating what Di Marzio said in the tweet at the start of this threadRomano is only copying what he saw in AS and reported by Spanish journalists.
Yeah I would prefer Jovic,my only other thought is could Cavani come in for 2 years then sign Haaland in 2022Jovic would be a good signing. Cavani screams panic buy.
What if Cavani become a disaster? We may be back into the market quickly for another forward. And if Haaland keeps developing well, it's not like he lack suitors for us to be so sure about acquiring him. In worse case, he for some reasons fails, or Haaland moves next year after some clubs paying Dortmund a silly fee then who would we buy then?Yeah I would prefer Jovic,my only other thought is could Cavani come in for 2 years then sign Haaland in 2022
Yeah I will admit there is a risk it doesn't work out hence why I feel Jovic would be less of a risk but doesn't have the proven pedigree of CavaniWhat if Cavani become a disaster? We may be back into the market quickly for another forward. And if Haaland keeps develop well, it's not like he lack suitors for us to be so sure about acquiring him. In worse case, he for some reasons fails, or Haaland move next year after some club paid Dortmund a silly fee then who would we buy then?
My point being that we can only do what best in front of us. Trying to get the best possible signing right now, or we're just deluding ourselves while turning into Arsenal.
How good is s Jovic though and why did he do so badly at Madrid?Jovic would be a good signing. Cavani screams panic buy.
Jovic IMO was better in his final season in Bundesliga than Timo Werner.How good is s Jovic though and why did he do so badly at Madrid?
You can't buy a free agentJovic would be a good signing. Cavani screams panic buy.
Yet some other clubs who also after a forward even just for rotation purpose gave it a pass. Beside his decline in performance, he had become injury prone recently too. Knowing our luck with old injury prone player, I wouldn't go near Cavani now if I am in decision making position at the club.Cavani on a free is too good to pass down I feel
Technically, in the absolutrly strictest possible sense, you are correct but he turns 19 tomorrow.A young player needs to be eased in. He’s been fantastic this far, and that’s due to his management.
I think Greenwood has the potential to be sensational for Utd, but he’s still only 18, and has a hell of a lot to prove. He’s not displacing Martial soon, and he don’t think he’s anywhere near ready to be a sole striker for United. That’s no bad thing, and he will continue to develop as an inside right forward. He’s only 18.
Our record with South Americans though..Cavani on a free is too good to pass down I feel
Ole and Ed needed a shit Ighalo performance to realise thatHe'd be a great option, but feck me why are we waiting till now? He's been available for fecking ages? Shambolic planning.
Will we ever learn?
3 years contract on 350k/week incoming
"He came Uruguay, he wages made us cry"
Josh King being a better option than fecking Cavani,never change Caf
The point being Cavani nowadays ain't the same player few years ago. He is also injured a lot now. 3 month to end the mare of a loan deal in Ighalo to receive a potential couple season deal for not much better return. Of course, skepticism is needed.Some of you are against striker like Cavani while our only backup option is Ighalo? Ighalo who looks out of shape completely and whos loan expires in 3 months
Exactly, ed trying to do things on the cheap only to realise, good things cost money.Ole and Ed needed a shit Ighalo performance to realise that
Martial needs competition, not just back up.Competition benefit players and the clubs too. We used to have a lot of competition for our forward, attacker position under SAF. Did no harm. If anything it squeezed more out of the player, even the lesser talented player.Can see why people are for and against cavani but what is the alternative for a player to come in and be content to be on the bench to be back up to martial?
Any elite young forward won't be happy with that surely?
I think the issue lies with the wages and making sure not to disrupt the wage structure. But then again we've got 3 goalkeepers who are altogether on around ~500k per week.My only concern here is his injury record.
Nothing ever works for you guys:
Martial's attributes are very different to Cavani's. It's not just competition but options.
- Sign youth => lacks experience
- Sign mid-20s => will block Xs development for years
- Sign over 30 => old, will get stuck with him, no resale value
Any of our "strikers" would do well to get anywhere near the career and peak level Cavani has achieved. His movement in particular is something they are miles away from.
We lack experience, we lack mentors for the kids, which was what I most appreciated about Ibra. At the other end, Cavani is on the same page as Suarez and Godin and wants to keep himself fit and competitive through WCQ and Qatar 2022, else he would have buggered off back home by now.
One of the best strikers of the last decade on a two year stint? We would be foolish not to go for it unless, again, his knees are completely gone, which is the only reasonable explanation for this not to have been looked into earlier.
Of course, a centre back also far more importantFor me personally someone to play on the right is more important, someone creative.
Pele was a number 10 :PCouldn’t care less about history. Pele was better than them all... who was better last season, Cavani, Pele or Martial?
Would he be in the top 5 strikers in the PL. No. I even caveated the second group, and it’s clear they are attacking players rather than out and out strikers.
There are very few out and out strikers these days. Look at Liverpool. Would he get in the team ahead of Firminho, Salah and Mane - absolutely not, yet the only out and out striker they have is Firminho.
Could be an alternative. Buying Sancho means Greenwood plays as a striker.Interesting that Sky Sports are saying they are both seen as alternatives to Sancho,personally was thinking they were completely seperate deals myself
Will wait to see if any of the usual journos suggest that is the case firstCould be an alternative. Buying Sancho means Greenwood plays as a striker.
Buying Cavani means Greenwood plays on the right.
So not a direct alternative, but it works due to the flexibility of Greenwood.
We don’t need a journalist to suggest it. We can do our own deductions.Will wait to see if any of the usual journos suggest that is the case first
Next summer maybe even January if Bailly/Tuanzebe are unable to prove themselves capable of staying fitOf course, a centre back also far more important
Still say there is an experienced goalscorer in there who can really help our front threeCavani is past it now. Jovic would be a better option, but looks like he is off to Roma. A younger big strong striker who can get on the end of these crosses that Telles and Sancho will provide, is what we need.