galwayfa
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2015
- Messages
- 751
If they were dead before impact, they still knew they were in trouble as didn't he text mates saying he be lucky to get across the sea.
That was tongue in cheek I’d say as opposed to him knowing it was going to happen.If they were dead before impact, they still knew they were in trouble as didn't he text mates saying he be lucky to get across the sea.
I’m guessing that it was being paid in installments and they are ruling that due to the small amount of time he was on Cardiff’s books then only the first installment is due. Personally I think it’s harsh - Cardiff should pay the full amount and claim insuranceLegally speaking, there seems to be an element of splitting the baby in this decision. Either the was a Cardiff footballer, which should mean they bear the legal cost of the acquisition, or he wasn't, in which case it would be Nantes' hard luck.
Insurance won't pay out as Sala wasn't technically their player - unfortunately this situation is harsh on both clubs, but a person died so it's all irrelevant.I’m guessing that it was being paid in installments and they are ruling that due to the small amount of time he was on Cardiff’s books then only the first installment is due. Personally I think it’s harsh - Cardiff should pay the full amount and claim insurance
Maybe. I'll be interested to hopefully read the decision. Cardiff, as I understand it, argued that he hadn't been registered and, even so, the contract had been frustrated and was incapable of being fulfilled. If they believe that Cardiff owe Nantes money then they are saying that the agreement was validly concluded. If that's the case, then why are Nantes bearing any loss on the transfer fee?I’m guessing that it was being paid in installments and they are ruling that due to the small amount of time he was on Cardiff’s books then only the first installment is due. Personally I think it’s harsh - Cardiff should pay the full amount and claim insurance
It’s a bizarre ruling, albeit in tragic circumstances that will almost never happen. Surely Nantes will appeal to CaS on the grounds if the contract was legally active, as FIFA has effectively ruled, they are well within their rights to collect full payment.Legally speaking, there seems to be an element of splitting the baby in this decision. Either the was a Cardiff footballer, which should mean they bear the legal cost of the acquisition, or he wasn't, in which case it would be Nantes' hard luck.
Makes me wonder if FIFA intentionally went with a bizarre compromise ruling, in order to punt the case to the CAS and wash their hands clean of it.It’s a bizarre ruling, albeit in tragic circumstances that will almost never happen. Surely Nantes will appeal to CaS on the grounds if the contract was legally active, as FIFA has effectively ruled, they are well within their rights to collect full payment.
Yes I had exactly the same thought.Makes me wonder if FIFA intentionally went with a bizarre compromise ruling, in order to punt the case to the CAS and wash their hands clean of it.
Should be ashamed of themselves, it surely will cause more damage to their reputation than what they are hoping the eventual long term outcome is.Cardiff are making themselves out to be right fecking bastards in this whole sorry case. He was clearly going to be their player, they’re being frankly pathetic trying to get out of this on technicalities. What a sorry state of a club, dragging Sala’s name through all of this.
If I am another club I would not negotiate or make and deals with Cardiff. Period. Disgusting by the club. Hope they get liquidated.Cardiff are making themselves out to be right fecking bastards in this whole sorry case. He was clearly going to be their player, they’re being frankly pathetic trying to get out of this on technicalities. What a sorry state of a club, dragging Sala’s name through all of this.
Why wouldn't it be?Pretty distasteful agreed, but is it really a case for the police?
Genuine question, what crime would this be classified as? Its obviously a horrible thing to do however I am not sure that it is illegal?Why wouldn't it be?
Not seen the image but there's offences under the public order and malicious communications act that are likely being considered.Genuine question, what crime would this be classified as? Its obviously a horrible thing to do however I am not sure that it is illegal?
Probably. Just because of the public interest factors in play.Pretty distasteful agreed, but is it really a case for the police?
Serves them right. Despicable cnuts.Cardiff City face a three-window transfer ban if they fail to pay Nantes the first instalment of the £15m fee for striker Emiliano Sala.
Sala, 28, died in a plane crash in January while travelling from France to join his new club.
Not the pilot. Whoever the organisation & people who allowed him to fly it need to be sued. They are the real one.So am I allowed to call the pilot a cnut for flying a plane he had no right to fly?
Emiliano Sala crash: Pilot Ibbotson 'not licensed for flight' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-51870306
He paid the ultimate price.. Whoever set this gig up needs to be reported.So am I allowed to call the pilot a cnut for flying a plane he had no right to fly?
Emiliano Sala crash: Pilot Ibbotson 'not licensed for flight' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-51870306
I understand that aswell but surely he should have shown some responsibility and refused to fly if he didn’t have the licence?Not the pilot. Whoever the organisation & people who allowed him to fly it need to be sued. They are the real one.