Emmanuel Macron

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,288
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,157
I wish I know what was going through François Mitterrand's mind when he lowered the retirement age to 60 years when his government was in charge, before Sarkozy rose it up to 62. All of that while the norm for retirement remained 65 years of age and that some European countries with better quality of life even have higher retirement ages.
 

atkar83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
866
Location
Vancouver, Canada
So why would he risk himself and his party for this? The world needs less right wing governments but this guy and Trudeau can't keep their screwing up and are opening the doors in their countries. Who knows if Biden can keep the US left in 2024, the UK is already Conservative, losing Canada and France won't help the worldwide situation. It's so frustrating. There better be a good reason to force this through
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
So why would he risk himself and his party for this? The world needs less right wing governments but this guy and Trudeau can't keep their screwing up and are opening the doors in their countries. Who knows if Biden can keep the US left in 2024, the UK is already Conservative, losing Canada and France won't help the worldwide situation. It's so frustrating. There better be a good reason to force this through
Countries simply can't afford the current retirement ages as it stands, as people live longer than they did 30 years ago and the current retirement generations are some of the biggest generations, that will be paid for by much smaller generations.
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,958
Supports
Barcelona
So why would he risk himself and his party for this? The world needs less right wing governments but this guy and Trudeau can't keep their screwing up and are opening the doors in their countries. Who knows if Biden can keep the US left in 2024, the UK is already Conservative, losing Canada and France won't help the worldwide situation. It's so frustrating. There better be a good reason to force this through
I know im a tinfoil nutcase, but i believe that there are certain powers that supercede goverments and when things like this happens, without passing through parliament, jeopardizing your political career, it seems to me that a non political decision had been taken from someone and is not negotiable. Standards of living are getting worse. There are crisis after crisis since 2008, covid, inflation, war between superpowers/proxies. And the gap keeps widening

The balls of not going through parliament. I hope they take out the guillotines, for real. And not only in france
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,958
Supports
Barcelona
Countries simply can't afford the current retirement ages as it stands, as people live longer than they did 30 years ago and the current retirement generations are some of the biggest generations, that will be paid for by much smaller generations.
They could if they would stop bailing out banks, political corruption, start taxing big companies and a big etc...

Our life expectancy 50 years ago was only 5-8 less in most of wealthy countries. The productivity had risen much more per inhabitant but this had been hoarded by companies. Politicians steals more than ever and they are servants of the private interests not the public interest.

They are lying that retirement and health care is unsustainable. It is a lie and they repeat it over and over till we repeated like parrots and we end believing it

In the near future will be less and less jobs due to automation and AI and you want to lengthen the retirement age? So more people to employ? Nah, they dont want to pay their retirement and we will have a miserable 60s unrmployed and a miserable 70-90 because the pension will be meager because you didnt work the last years of your life.

Lies lies lies. Widening the gap
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,230
Supports
Liverpool
62 to 64? And they burn down cities for it?

Spoiled bastards. Not long ago, my retirement age rose to 72.
 

HTG

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
6,004
Supports
Bayern
62 to 64? And they burn down cities for it?

Spoiled bastards. Not long ago, my retirement age rose to 72.
Maybe you should have considered burning cities as well.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,271
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
Except it's not the rich that lose in riots is it, they're still living far away in peace and quiet. The losers are the poorest people, shopkeepers, often 1st generation immigrants working 12+ hours a day and seeing their businesses wrecked, and the people living above them in terror praying they don't get burned down.

If the rioters were to target politicians and the wealthy that won't pay taxes then I would have some respect, they would still be wrong but I could understand it, but rioting in city centres hurts the weakest the most, it's indefensible.
 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
41,001
Supports
arse
from my years of working with french people, i can understand why they’d be furious at having to pretend to do work for another 2 years of their lives.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,828
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
So why would he risk himself and his party for this? The world needs less right wing governments but this guy and Trudeau can't keep their screwing up and are opening the doors in their countries. Who knows if Biden can keep the US left in 2024, the UK is already Conservative, losing Canada and France won't help the worldwide situation. It's so frustrating. There better be a good reason to force this through
It's the far left and Brain of France, Mélenchon, who thinks the retirement age should be reduced to 60, increase pensions and finance it by the government borrowing more debt. Le Pen just joins in the noise. When they've got no pension in the future they'll be happy. It had been agreed by the cross party committees in the parliament and the senate but then they started playing politics. There will be a vote at some point.

Mélenchon was supposed to retire and then appointed his successor who went on to be prosecuted for beating up his wife.
 

Member 125398

Guest
Countries simply can't afford the current retirement ages as it stands, as people live longer than they did 30 years ago and the current retirement generations are some of the biggest generations, that will be paid for by much smaller generations.
Record profits say that they can but the money is going somewhere else.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,714
There better be a good reason to force this through
Isn't it to bring France's retirement age in line with its competitors, or maybe knowing that the French tend to riot at the drop of a hat, maybe it is a diversion tactic by Macron?
Also as most politicians (except David Cameron) are aware, you should be sure of the answer before you ask the question. Maybe Macron knows what the answer will be, if he calls for a vote?
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,230
Supports
Liverpool
This is the wrong mindset.
It was mostly a statement of jalousy.

With that said, raising the retirement age when people get older than previous generations doesn’t strike me as a terrible idea.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,692
Location
The Zone
I believe in democracy so I don't actually approve, but it's not as downright immoral as calling for riots on the streets.


Unless I’ve missed it, there hasn’t been reports of attacks on small businesses or local people getting terrorised(The locals are the ones protesting).

Some cars were set on fire as a symbol for the barricades and then the usual fighting with the police. All seem very reasonable considering Macron has undemocratically forced through a increase in the pension age.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,693
This kind of direct attack on a symbol of french state power will move the average patriotic Jacques away from his natural sympathy for protestors...a more measured approach is needed. Less hot-headedness and more acknowledgement of economic realities. This unruly protest will solidify a negative image of the country, turning investors away, and of course harm workers. Just like minimum wage, maximum hours, firing protection, and other regressive legislation eventually only harms workers.

e- nvm, he got here first :)
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,931
Location
Somewhere out there
The citizens of so many countries seemed to think furlough schemes and long lockdown wasn’t going to cost them big time later on.
2 extra years work for the French is probably just the beginning.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,828
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Absolutely, but let’s not pretend this wasn’t the final nail in the coffin and likely just the beginning.
The pension age in France is a joke and the discussion has been going on for the best part of 15 years and the country cannot afford it. Nor can any country. Macron was elected in the full knowledge that it was going to happen. How it was done was not a good look, falling 3 votes short but if it isn't done France is in trouble.

Fortunately, so far, we are not governed by idiots like Mélenchon or Le Pen or we'd have been bankrupt years ago. but they are both populists with no clue.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,157
The pension age in France is a joke and the discussion has been going on for the best part of 15 years and the country cannot afford it. Nor can any country. Macron was elected in the full knowledge that it was going to happen. How it was done was not a good look, falling 3 votes short but if it isn't done France is in trouble.

Fortunately, so far, we are not governed by idiots like Mélenchon or Le Pen or we'd have been bankrupt years ago. but they are both populists with no clue.
Indeed.

I wish I knew what François Mitterrand was exactly thinking when he lowered retirement from 65 to 60 back in 1983. He pushed on the grounds that the aging of the population would lead France to financial ruin, but I don't see where the logic stood behind that line of thought.

I looked at this data about retirement age across countries, and I swear that vocal lot really have some nerve to protest when there are European countries with better overall quality of life and yet higher retirement age. Switzerland are locked on 64-65, Denmark on 67, the Netherlands on 66-68, Finland is flexible between 63.75 to 68 years of age, Iceland on 67, Germany increasing gradually to 67, and so on.
 

lonelyred

Full Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,302
Location
Far far away...
Except it's not the rich that lose in riots is it, they're still living far away in peace and quiet. The losers are the poorest people, shopkeepers, often 1st generation immigrants working 12+ hours a day and seeing their businesses wrecked, and the people living above them in terror praying they don't get burned down.

If the rioters were to target politicians and the wealthy that won't pay taxes then I would have some respect, they would still be wrong but I could understand it, but rioting in city centres hurts the weakest the most, it's indefensible.
Maybe that's what they thought in quiet Versailles in 1790?

I am proud of French. The GOATs of protests. :keano:
 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,194
Location
Sweden
I looked at this data about retirement age across countries, and I swear that vocal lot really have some nerve to protest when there are European countries with better overall quality of life and yet higher retirement age. Switzerland are locked on 64-65, Denmark on 67, the Netherlands on 66-68, Finland is flexible between 63.75 to 68 years of age, Iceland on 67, Germany increasing gradually to 67, and so on.
I am not convinced this is a good argument. Other countries driving unjust policies doesn't mean everyone has to follow it. And it is hard to compare the countries. Here in Sweden, we have a high retirement age, but those with the highest incomes can afford to retire early while the poor people often need to work past that regular age.

In the case of France I saw this on Twitter, if it is true, I fully understand that those affected will protest, why should they pledge to work longer when they have such a high chance of never reaching the retirement age? Financing a system they have 30% chances of never taking any benefit from, just so that the wealthier ones can have their pensions?


 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,194
Location
Sweden
Maybe that's what they thought in quiet Versailles in 1790?

I am proud of French. The GOATs of protests. :keano:
Violent protests are never the solution... It only leads to alienating the “commoners”, you end up losing the popular support. I saw many scandalous scenes on Twitter like this one...

" Louis XVI we beheaded him, Macron we can start again! chants the crowd at #Concorde . #ReformedesRetraite "
 

lonelyred

Full Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,302
Location
Far far away...
Violent protests are never the solution... It only leads to alienating the “commoners”, you end up losing the popular support. I saw many scandalous scenes on Twitter like this one...

" Louis XVI we beheaded him, Macron we can start again! chants the crowd at #Concorde . #ReformedesRetraite "
If only that was how the people have thought and acted through history.

(I understand your point, and partly agree (at least theoretically), but I don't believe that's how the human nature (and society) works. By the way - and of course the context is not the same, but what was the other solution for protesters in Moscow or Teheran?)
 
Last edited: