DomesticTadpole
Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Kane looks like he is either tired or is carrying a knock. Lukaku off for Mertens.
Two players on three who are playing tomorrow. I didn't hear the 2nd one, but Mbappe is one.So Kane gets the golden boot then ?
What does getting subbed from a WC match have to do with his United career ?Haha lukaku being replaced
And utd have to depend on him for goals
Unless MBappe scores a hat trick or 4 goals I thinkSo Kane gets the golden boot then ?
Geoff Hurst is still the only player to score a hattrick in the final, I doubt anyone will score 4.Two players on three who are playing tomorrow. I didn't hear the 2nd one, but Mbappe is one.
Disagree. His touch can be dodgy at times but it's definitely improved. He'll bag 20+ for us next season.His first touch is terrible. His pace and power is great and he's learning to make better use of his abilities. I do worry that he'll always have a bad first touch and lack of composure.
Nothing just a bit frustratedWhat does getting subbed from a WC match have to do with his United career ?
Kanes golden boot basically coming from penalties as well.Shit game from Rom. Both him and Kane started the tournament off so well in the first 2 games but then pretty wank in the knockout stage bar 1 good game each.
I actually hope he does as he would be a worthier winner.Unless MBappe scores a hat trick
4 goals itself isnt bad but its that he only scored against the 2 worst teams in the competition and then did basically nothing the rest of the time (had a good half against Brazil though). So many times he just doesnt get involved as much as he should, or his touch lets him down to ruin chances or ruin situations that could lead to chances. Just all very meh with him.For United it may make sense but for Belgium, no way. Only 4 goals against those poor teams is a terrible return as a CF
Griezmann by the looks of things:Two players on three who are playing tomorrow. I didn't hear the 2nd one, but Mbappe is one.
No one is bashing him. Why is any criticism of Lukaku always taken as attacking him? His first touch is poor more often than not, it’s a simple statement of fact that you see in front your eyes. He has his redeeming traits, as does his negative ones.And now everyone is back to bashing to Lukaku.
Lukaku was phenomenal against Brazil. Kane has never had a game even close to that in this tournament.Shit game from Rom. Both him and Kane started the tournament off so well in the first 2 games but then pretty wank in the knockout stage bar 1 good game each.
What?Yeh, if Lukaku sorted out his touch we'd have a top 5 player in the world. A genuine successor to Ronaldo. But you have to take these things with a player of his profile, he'd probably have to get considerably smaller to improve his touch and then he wouldn't be a freight train and shrug players off like they are children.
Thanks.Griezmann by the looks of things:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/world-cup/top-scorers
True.4 goals itself isnt bad but its that he only scored against the 2 worst teams in the competition and then did basically nothing the rest of the time (had a good half against Brazil though). So many times he just doesnt get involved as much as he should, or his touch lets him down to ruin chances or ruin situations that could lead to chances. Just all very meh with him.
He's probably over it already to be honest...Stones is bullying Lukaku. This must be the greatest humiliation ever. You will never recover from that.
2 tap ins, 3 penalties and a deflection he knew nothing aboutKanes golden boot basically coming from penalties as well.