English & Irish Cricket Summer 2018

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
Flintoff never really had a sustained spell of being world class. In my opinion, Stokes is already better than Flintoff.
Flintoff from the start of 2004 until the end of the 2005 Ashes averaged 44 with the bat and 25 with the ball through 23 tests which is about 29% of his entire England career. 18 months is a reasonably well sustained period of being world class and about as much as any England fan could have hoped for considering his injury record.
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,780
Location
Mumbai
My impression from afar, so please correct if I am wrong, is that Shastri is coach because he submissive towards Kohli's which is a complete contrast to the previous coach Anil Kumble. Ganguly is absolutely spot on, they've had a different top 8 in every one of their away tests this year, clearly the batsmen need to step up but giving them little clarity on their role or little confidence in their place in the team does not help them. Stuff like having Parthiv Patel opening and promoting Ashwin to 6 ahead of Karthik is funky, over-thought nonsense. That is not to say it's all coming from Kohli, it may well be coming from Shastri but the coach-captain axis must be clear in everything they do and endeavour to put players in the best position to succeed. They are never going to be able to play the moving ball if they play a test here and a test there.
Is correct.
 

zing

Zingle balls
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
13,809
Have India played the same team in consecutive matches under kohli even once? I'm guessing no..
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,307
Have India played the same team in consecutive matches under kohli even once? I'm guessing no..
Chopping and changing is typical Kohli. I've been seeing this right from when he started captaining RCB.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,744
My impression from afar, so please correct if I am wrong, is that Shastri is coach because he is submissive towards Kohli's which is a complete contrast to the previous coach Anil Kumble. Ganguly is absolutely spot on, they've had a different top 8 in every one of their away tests this year, clearly the batsmen need to step up but giving them little clarity on their role or little confidence in their place in the team does not help them. Stuff like having Parthiv Patel opening and promoting Ashwin to 6 ahead of Karthik is funky, over-thought nonsense. That is not to say it's all coming from Kohli, it may well be coming from Shastri but the coach-captain axis must be clear in everything they do and endeavour to put players in the best position to succeed. They are never going to be able to play the moving ball if they play a test here and a test there.
Shastri is just a beer bringer and party organiser for the team. He doesn't have any power whatsoever.
 

Hephaestus

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
5,187
Ollie Pope in for Malan for second test - good to see they haven't reverted to previous options.

Woakes in for Stokes was to be expected.
Happy with that, he's very young but he's been in excellent form. Interesting to see who they move around to make it work, maybe Buttler upto four, Bairstow at five and Pope at six. Don't think they'll want to throw him straight in at four.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
Happy with that, he's very young but he's been in excellent form. Interesting to see who they move around to make it work, maybe Buttler upto four, Bairstow at five and Pope at six. Don't think they'll want to throw him straight in at four.
Pope is very highly rated but I do find it a bit weird he's been called up ahead of Joe Clarke who is also highly rated, is a more natural top order batsman and has more experience. In theory they can take the gloves off Bairstow, let him focus on his batting @ 4 and give the gloves to either Buttler or Pope. They could also shoehorn in Moeen @ 4 with the benefit of him being an extra spinner in case the pitch is dry down at Lords, Buttler, Curran, Woakes @ 6,7 & 8.
 
Last edited:

Hephaestus

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
5,187
Pope is very highly rated but I do find it a bit weird he's been called up ahead of Joe Clarke who is also highly rated, is a more natural top order batsman and has more experience. In theory they can take the gloves off Bairstow, let him focus on his batting @ 4 and give the gloves to either Buttler or Pope. They could also shoehorn in Moeen @ 4 with the benefit of him being an extra spinner in case the pitch is dry up down at Lords, Buttler, Curran, Woakes @ 6,7 & 8.
Reckon his unbeaten 50 in the Lions game last month gave Pope the edge, it is harsh on Clarke though. I'd be very surprised if they brought Moeen in at 4 though don't think he's done enough with the bat recently to justify coming in that early.
 

JMack1234

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
1,528
What will happen to Stokes if he's convicted? Do you think it'll affect his England career?
 

Hephaestus

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
5,187
What will happen to Stokes if he's convicted? Do you think it'll affect his England career?
Doubt it. He might miss the rest of the series as punishment but almost no chance it goes further than that and I'd expect it to just be a ticking off rather than even that.
 
Important reminder about Stokes

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
If you're based in the UK you probably should avoid discussing the trial whilst it is ongoing on here. People have been done for contempt of court for messages posted on online message boards in the past.

Perhaps worth sticking a reminder in the title @KM ?
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,744
If you're based in the UK you probably should avoid discussing the trial whilst it is ongoing on here. People have been done for contempt of court for messages posted on online message boards in the past.

Perhaps worth sticking a reminder in the title @KM ?
I've threadmarked your post and edited your post.

Although the above two posts were only discussing the footage so they should be okay, I think contempt is when you post something about the court proceedings.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,099
If you're based in the UK you probably should avoid discussing the trial whilst it is ongoing on here. People have been done for contempt of court for messages posted on online message boards in the past.

Perhaps worth sticking a reminder in the title @KM ?
Didn't know there was legal precedent for that tbh. Interesting, thanks for the heads up. I'll delete my previous post.

For those who don't know the contempt of court legislation it basically means that when discussing an ongoing court case, you can only relate the bare facts of what's been said in court. You can't add your own opinion, or any additional background or context. It's to prevent the jury being influenced if they stumble across it.

So if you write 'in court today xxx was accused of thieving. He denies the charges', it's ok.

'ah, i always knew he was a thieving cnut' - not ok.

'of course, he's got previous for this hasn't he' - also not ok.

Think I'll probably steer clear of the whole case from now on though tbh.
 
Last edited:

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Didn't know there was legal precedent for that tbh. Interesting, thanks for the heads up. I'll delete my previous post.

For those who don't know the contempt of court legislation it basically means that when discussing an ongoing court case, you can only relate the bare facts of what's been said in court. You can't add your own opinion, or any additional background or context.

So 'in court today xxx was accused of thieving. He denies the charges' is ok.

'ah, i always knew he was a thieving cnut' isn't.

Think I'll probably steer clear of the whole case from now on though tbh.
Yeah, definitely better to be safe than sorry and plenty of time to discuss the rights and wrongs of the case after the verdict.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
So Pope in for Malan as expected, but confirmed he will bat at 4.

I think that's a pretty shoddy decision given that England's vice captain is playing as a specialist bat at 7 it would be nice for him to move up (maybe to 5 with Bairstow to 4) and allow the 20 year old who's never batted higher than 6 some protection.
 

ArmchairCritic

You got pets me too mines are dead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
16,154
So Pope in for Malan as expected, but confirmed he will bat at 4.

I think that's a pretty shoddy decision given that England's vice captain is playing as a specialist bat at 7 it would be nice for him to move up (maybe to 5 with Bairstow to 4) and allow the 20 year old who's never batted higher than 6 some protection.
He batted 5 for England A vs India A. I imagine that he's largely batting at 4 because long-term that where England need him to fit. Root is nailed on 3, Bairstow at 5, Stokes is obsessed with batting 6 and Buttler is going to try and be Adam Gilchrist minus the wicket-keeping. They could have taken the gloves off Bairstow and said go and focus on your batting, moved him to 4 and had Pope at 5 but again that doesn't seem to be their long-term vision. Also batting @ 6 only protects the kid if the top 4 aren't being knocked over and as we've seen that's not really the case with this England team.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
He batted 5 for England A vs India A. I imagine that he's largely batting at 4 because long-term that where England need him to fit. Root is nailed on 3, Bairstow at 5, Stokes is obsessed with batting 6 and Buttler is going to try and be Adam Gilchrist minus the wicket-keeping. They could have taken the gloves off Bairstow and said go and focus on your batting, moved him to 4 and had Pope at 5 but again that doesn't seem to be their long-term vision. Also batting @ 6 only protects the kid if the top 4 aren't being knocked over and as we've seen that's not really the case with this England team.
I understand the logic. I'm just not particularly convinced it's any good.

There's a reason specialist number 7 batsmen aren't a thing and if Buttler is to have a career as a test match batsman (rather than eventually taking the glove off Bairstow, although I think that is becoming an increasingly sensible option) he'll eventually have to move in to a batting position. If the selectors are convinced he's good enough to play as a specialist batsman (as they must be by selecting him as one) then that move might as well happen now.

I take it that Buttler will have to move up anyway with Stokes out:

Cook/Jennings/Root/Pope/Bairstow/Buttler/Woakes(Ali)/Curran/Rashid/Broad/Anderson


Anyway, looks like today might be a washout so I imagine spin will again not play a huge role in what effectively becomes a four day test.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,744
Ffs, so it's drizzling now??
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,601
I think the weather is supposed to be back to normal British Summertime now so the next 4 tests will probably all be rained off .
Not sure, next week's prospects look better. Thought the claim was that the heatwave could last all the way to October?
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,935
We've had two months of consistent sun with almost no rain, which I can't remember the last time happened in London.

To compensate the heavens will most likely open up for the next two months straight.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
I'd be absolutely seething if I were an India fan but that's a hilarious passage of play.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,744
I doubt England would've been any better than this score considering the pitch conditions, terribly unlucky to lose the toss.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
I doubt England would've been any better than this score considering the pitch conditions, terribly unlucky to lose the toss.
15-3 is verily laying a foundation by recent England standards
 

MJJ

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2009
Messages
28,954
Location
sunderland(1)-Derby(1)
Don't think this stop start is fair to India, the umpires should wait until they are sure atleast 20 overs will be bowled before xalling India batsmen back.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Don't think this stop start is fair to India, the umpires should wait until they are sure atleast 20 overs will be bowled before xalling India batsmen back.
You can never be too sure with the weather on days like this though. You can spend an hour looking at a black cloud that doesn't do anything thinking it will rain and there's no point going out only for that rain never to materialise.

If you lost a days play when it didn't rain because the umpires 'weren't sure' there'd be riots (alright it's Lord's so irritated tasks) and when insurance will have to pay £2m to reimburse fans yesterday the idea that you can do anything other than try and get on as quickly as you can when it stops is a bit of a non-starter.

Sucks for the batting side, but not much else for it really.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,421
Location
Manchester
It's been grey and wet all day here in Manchester and now suddenly it's nice and sunny.

Just one of them days. India were unlucky to lose the toss.
 

paulscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
20,204
It stopped raining they should be out there playing, not waiting till 5:00 for a pitch inspection, it that passes still be about 15 min after that before they start play again.