I didn't say He is. I asked you was Lukaku a CL top scorer at some point when He was 19? Because Halaand was after 4 match days in CL. Seven goals in four matches, above Robert fecking Lewandowski (even now, He's only 2 behind Lewa). That is an impressive number for someone his age, in such a high level competition.
Those numbers in how many minutes / matches? If Haaland is only comparable to Lukaku then We might as well never sign a young player anymore out of fear that They'll not live up to expectations. In that case our manager shouldn't be Ole. Just buy old players that's a bit better than Lukaku like Mandzukic. The point of signing youngsters with talents is to develop them further. And to be fair Lukaku type of striker isn't bad, as long as He doesn't have such a horrid first touch and can actually play modern football than hoof football.
Dude at some point Sardar Azmoun was top scorer at CL. They score many goals as a team (only one game they didnt score this season and it was the second game against Liverpool in CL last week). He is good striker, no doubt about that, but he scored half of his goals against Gent and more than 1/3 in one game. Its pretty soon to judge him based on those games.
I never said that he is only comparable to Lukaku, I just said that he is similar type of a striker and I believe I am right, even though many people says the complete oppossite right now. Austrian league (believe me, Austria is our neighbour) is tier potato, its even worse than our (Czech) league and that really means something.
I have no problem with signing like that, I just dont understand why we sold Lukaku 4 months ago to buy a similar type of player from austrian league. Lukaku was proven striker at the top level, but Halands is not and to be honest, we are not in the position to give pople time. We need to get better right now.