Bearded but no genius
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Messages
- 67,680
Oh, and there are Christmas sales on so it would be cheap to deck your halls with bows of Stevie Me.
I hope this helps.
I hope this helps.
I was laughing at this and then I realised you were being serious. That made it even funnier.Don't know what's more pathetic: your club's actions during and after the incident or that there's nobody here who has enough decency to admit that MU players and staff were obviously in the wrong. I think it's all pretty clear, unless you're wearing heavily tinted red glasses while reading the report or possibly, if you're retarded.
I can imagine the reaction if it was the other way around : switch Chelsea for United, Stamford Bridge for Old Trafford, Evra for one of CFC players, etc etc. Doubt anyone here would question the commission had the outcome been favorable for MU.
United players carry the lion's share of the blame for what happened, and on top of it the coaching staff blatantly lied in an attempt to cover up their players' behavior and shift the blame onto Chelsea, while falsely accusing the groundsman of racism in the process, which makes the whole thing even more despicable.
But of course,that was just another conspiracy by the FA against the ever suffering Manchester United. In fact, any time your players get in trouble, which seems to happen quite often nowadays, it's always somebody else's fault.
and this years winner of biggest retard on the InternetsDon't know what's more pathetic: your club's actions during and after the incident or that there's nobody here who has enough decency to admit that MU players and staff were obviously in the wrong. I think it's all pretty clear, unless you're wearing heavily tinted red glasses while reading the report or possibly, if you're retarded.
I can imagine the reaction if it was the other way around : switch Chelsea for United, Stamford Bridge for Old Trafford, Evra for one of CFC players, etc etc. Doubt anyone here would question the commission had the outcome been favorable for MU.
United players carry the lion's share of the blame for what happened, and on top of it the coaching staff blatantly lied in an attempt to cover up their players' behavior and shift the blame onto Chelsea, while falsely accusing the groundsman of racism in the process, which makes the whole thing even more despicable.
But of course,that was just another conspiracy by the FA against the ever suffering Manchester United. In fact, any time your players get in trouble, which seems to happen quite often nowadays, it's always somebody else's fault.
Just as I thought, only retards decided to reply. The ones who have any brain know I'm right.
Ever thought about it the other way round?Just as I thought, only retards decided to reply. The ones who have any brain know I'm right.
your probably one of the groundstaff.....Just as I thought, only retards decided to reply. The ones who have any brain know I'm right.
Should you call the mental health professionals or should we?Just as I thought, only retards decided to reply. The ones who have any brain know I'm right.
Haven't I already said that retards needn't reply? Then again, if you're retard you must have a problem reading and comprehendingShould you call the mental health professionals or should we?
You're cracking up once again before our very eyes.Haven't I already said that retards needn't reply? Then again, if you're retard you must have a problem reading and comprehending
mate, speaking as a relative neutral, it's pretty clear that this is a bit of a balse up on the part of the FA. the statement they've come out with is hilarious. they haven't even managed to avoid basic errors, such as explaining how they've justified their decision, or not admitting that David Pleat is being employed as an FA judge. Then there's the part which completely contradicts the next.Don't know what's more pathetic: your club's actions during and after the incident or that there's nobody here who has enough decency to admit that MU players and staff were obviously in the wrong. I think it's all pretty clear, unless you're wearing heavily tinted red glasses while reading the report or possibly, if you're retarded.
I can imagine the reaction if it was the other way around : switch Chelsea for United, Stamford Bridge for Old Trafford, Evra for one of CFC players, etc etc. Doubt anyone here would question the commission had the outcome been favorable for MU.
United players carry the lion's share of the blame for what happened, and on top of it the coaching staff blatantly lied in an attempt to cover up their players' behavior and shift the blame onto Chelsea, while falsely accusing the groundsman of racism in the process, which makes the whole thing even more despicable.
But of course,that was just another conspiracy by the FA against the ever suffering Manchester United. In fact, any time your players get in trouble, which seems to happen quite often nowadays, it's always somebody else's fault.
Patrice Evra is my personal Jesus.clearly they're a pair of retards.
Evra jumped towards him like a mad hatter and had to be held back as he went a bit loopy. That's pretty obvious from the photos.I think it is a bit rich to rip antiHenry apart when you all take the opposite extreme and claim it is all an anti Man Utd conspiracy and no one in your employ did anything untoward.
I take the view that there was wrong on both sides, and for the FA to blame one side exclusively, when anyone with a pair of working eyes can see it's not a one-sided argument, is unbelievable.I think it is a bit rich to rip antiHenry apart when you all take the opposite extreme and claim it is all an anti Man Utd conspiracy and no one in your employ did anything untoward.
Yep, Billy big bollox footballer meets low-rent jobsworth.This is about two blokes who got in a fight because one of them wouldn't keep off the grass. clearly they're a pair of retards.
Or little guy beats up big guy for no reason.Yep, Billy big bollox footballer meets low-rent jobsworth.
His overall tone was foolish in his comments as it was obvious what would come to him and where this thread would go though there is alot of credibility in what he actually said. Evra has never lost his head like that on the pitch so I'm in a way hoping he was provoked as it would be scary if he wasn't. Saying that it was a highly charged match (ala Ferdinand managing to miss a wall and kick a steward) which threatened to spill over into a mass brawl so perhaps there is logic in Chelsea's position.Evra jumped towards him like a mad hatter and had to be held back as he went a bit loopy. That's pretty obvious from the photos.
Is anyone denying this?
Do you stand by antihenry's comments in this thread?
No one's denying that a lot of the blame for the brawl itself can be apportioned to Evra, you insufferable little muppet. The argument here is that the punishment is far too great for the offence commited, and it's particularly galling as the Chelsea staff also involved have escaped without punishment because they're not players.You don't have to read the full report, this excerpt pretty much sums up everything.
"67. It must be borne in mind that Mr Evra’s proven misconduct on 26 April 2008 involved the following: (1) he was the first person in the whole incident physically to assault another person, when he barged into Mr Griffin; (2) that assault was unprovoked and unjustified (and was nothing to do with anything passing between Mr Evra and Mr Bethell, which came afterwards and was actually triggered off by Mr Evra’s barge on Mr Griffin); (3) Mr Evra then committed a further separate assault by striking Mr Bethell, a member of the Chelsea ground staff; (4) although we have regard to Mr Bethell’s own aggressive and provocative conduct, that does not justify Mr Evra’s action which, although the blow was slight, constituted violent conduct under The FA Rules; (5) Mr Evra then broke away from restraint and deliberately ran back towards Mr Bethell to become involved in his third physical altercation of the overall incident; (6) although Mr Evra was subject to strong provocation by Mr Bethell, that does not justify his action in going back into the fray, especially following the two assaults already committed by him."
So if you aren't retarded or biased beyond any reasonable limit how, after reading this, can you still deny that Evra was not a victim but the main culprit?
You don't have to read the full report, this excerpt pretty much sums up everything.
"67. It must be borne in mind that Mr Evra’s proven misconduct on 26 April 2008 involved the following: (1) he was the first person in the whole incident physically to assault another person, when he barged into Mr Griffin; (2) that assault was unprovoked and unjustified (and was nothing to do with anything passing between Mr Evra and Mr Bethell, which came afterwards and was actually triggered off by Mr Evra’s barge on Mr Griffin); (3) Mr Evra then committed a further separate assault by striking Mr Bethell, a member of the Chelsea ground staff; (4) although we have regard to Mr Bethell’s own aggressive and provocative conduct, that does not justify Mr Evra’s action which, although the blow was slight, constituted violent conduct under The FA Rules; (5) Mr Evra then broke away from restraint and deliberately ran back towards Mr Bethell to become involved in his third physical altercation of the overall incident; (6) although Mr Evra was subject to strong provocation by Mr Bethell, that does not justify his action in going back into the fray, especially following the two assaults already committed by him."
So if you aren't retarded or biased beyond any reasonable limit how, after reading this, can you still deny that Evra was not a victim but the main culprit?
I don't argue about the severity of punishment, I could care less if Evra was just fined without missing any games, all I said was ,he is guilty and so is your club, so people should stop hiding behind this "FA conspiracy" nonsense because it's pathetic. When I felt Chelsea acted wrongly or played poorly on more than a few occasions in the past I didn't look for excuses and admitted as much on this very forum. I don't blame the ref, or the FA, or Platini or whatever new scapegoat comes along. Sometimes you just have to face the facts and admit that your club/players/manager were wrong and be done with it.No one's denying that a lot of the blame for the brawl itself can be apportioned to Evra, you insufferable little muppet. The argument here is that the punishment is far too great for the offence commited, and it's particularly galling as the Chelsea staff also involved have escaped without punishment because they're not players.
A four match ban is ludicrously heavy handed, but a punishment isn't -- Evra did do wrong.
Further, what kind of response did you expect in this thread considering you came crusading in here like some vengeful spirit, calling everyone retards and beating your chest from atop a soapbox? I assume you're still bitter at the complete and utter idiot you were made to look after no money was claimed from United in the end over Obi Mikel, when you'd spent ever so long campaigning as to why your club had a watertight case.
To be fair, you think we were "guilty" of victimising your innocent club in the Mikel saga and promised us our day of reckoning was upon us.I don't argue about the severity of punishment, I could care less if Evra was just fined without missing any games, all I said was ,he is guilty and so is your club, so people should stop hiding behind this "FA conspiracy" nonsense because it's pathetic. When I felt Chelsea acted wrongly or played poorly on more than a few occasions in the past I didn't look for excuses and admitted as much on this very forum. I don't blame the ref, or the FA, or Platini or whatever new scapegoat comes along. Sometimes you just have to face the facts and admit that your club/players/manager were wrong and be done with it.
OK, it was wrong and not politically correct to call some posters here retards so I apologize, from now on I'll use the term "intellectually disabled".
you know that description suits you to a tee - OK I¨m sorry that is too harshI don't argue about the severity of punishment, I could care less if Evra was just fined without missing any games, all I said was ,he is guilty and so is your club, so people should stop hiding behind this "FA conspiracy" nonsense because it's pathetic. When I felt Chelsea acted wrongly or played poorly on more than a few occasions in the past I didn't look for excuses and admitted as much on this very forum. I don't blame the ref, or the FA, or Platini or whatever new scapegoat comes along. Sometimes you just have to face the facts and admit that your club/players/manager were wrong and be done with it.
OK, it was wrong and not politically correct to call some posters here retards so I apologize, from now on I'll use the term "intellectually disabled".
Well then it's a bit frigging stupid having a go at the people on here, since that is exactly what it is they've been complaining about, you tit.I don't argue about the severity of punishment, I could care less if Evra was just fined without missing any games
Have you noticed that it's always you who reacts to my posts and not the other way around? Probably because I'm not, and never was, interested in your opinion.Mental illness alert.
I've never seen a poster wind himself up more than Aunty.
It is worse than DJS (before he vanished when we won the Double)
Truly classic stuff.Have you noticed that it's always you who reacts to my posts and not the other way around? Probably because I'm not, and never was, interested in your opinion.
Your posts in general are lame and full of unintelligible crap and laughable attempts at humor that apart from you no one considers even remotely witty.You're an attention seeking whore who has a very high opinion of himself and hates the most when others ignore him.
That's what I'll do from now on. Let's see how long will it take before you start replying again.
The quotes below are from a few posts,all in full, written before my response.Well then it's a bit frigging stupid having a go at the people on here, since that is exactly what it is they've been complaining about, you tit.
You're having a go at a load of people for apparently disagreeing with you - and you've now admitted that in fact all those people were talking about something completely different, which you have entirely discounted.
This may have escaped your notice, but this makes no sense, and renders everything you have said in this thread utterly pointless.
Poorly written report and full of shit
FOS article
The Times standards are declining.
david pleat was part of the independent panel that says it all really
At least we know for future:
Evidence from United = unreliable and inaccurate.
Evidence from others = truthful and well presented.
I think it's madness. These chelsea people shouldn't even have been in and around our players - period. They have no right to mess with our players as they wind down.
It's the fa who should be slammed. It's simple. You tell any fecking club - let the opponants players finish up and then do your shit. If you interfere then you'll get fined..
Simple...
go to hell FA, what a loads of rubbish remarks against us.