But I have him because I had 13m left with a team I'm happy with and still wanted Liverpool coverage. I could've easily not captained him because they've been playing crap, but still have him in in case they do do well. The only way your point holds true is if you've had to struggle to get him in, but even then it makes much more sense to captain who you think is in form and will do well that week, not who's the most expensive.Nah it is the case imo - basically if you’ve made a judgement to spend 13m on the most expensive player in the game, then logically you’d need to captain him in the easiest fixture in the season (home to Fulham who are conceding by the bucket).
Put another way if you decide not to Captain Salah as you think he’ll only get 6 points or so vs Fulham at home, then why on earth have you paid 13m for him. If you view him as that type of player then he’s never going to justify his points to cost.
That’s not to say he won’t blank, could definitely happen as we saw with Kane earlier on in the season, but the only reason anyone should have Salah is because they think he’ll get a 10+ score vs Fulham in which case they’ll captain him.
I captained him because I think Liverpool will want to prove a point. I'd have considered captaining Mane for the same reason.