Cutch
Full Member
I also think 2 games a day for 1st round if possible. Will drag on a bit too long otherwise
I wanted two as well, but Anto picked my 2nd choice keeper, so I went with another centerback as a sub. It could be helpful to have a pre and a post '72 keeper for the reinforcements later.@Balu who else picked two keepers? I only did it because I shafted myself with Zoff
Yeah he's short going by the GK standards. Just 5 ft 10.He looks really small
What I still don't understand is what was the need to pick van Hanegem when Cerezo was available. Better for the role, better fit with the other two, no issues with the Krauts behind him, wouldn't have ended up scrambling for non-Europeans at the end... Bizarre really. Theon must have been mesmerised by something he read or saw about him, no idea what exactly.I thought about discussing it when he was picked, but then decided, it's not worth it. If the players fit each other on the pitch, then I'm fine. I'd have much more problem with someone trying to play Cruyff and Maradona in the same team, as van Hanegem next to Matthäus in midfield.
I know it's a bit picky but could I be on 7th or 16th? I'll struggle with the other dates as we are on holidays in the beach!Tentative schedule
1st round
Match 1 - 2 Jan
Match 2 - 4 Jan
Match 3 - 7 Jan
Match 4 - 9 Jan
Match 5 - 11 Jan
Match 6 - 14 Jan
Match 7 - 16 Jan
Match 8 - 18 Jan
Break of 5 days before draft of 4 rounds start on 23 Jan, before the QF draw
Your flying pig has been picked already Aldo.Welcome back, my loyal servant. (No home, important to say in this case)
The logic is that you can easily swap keepers without affecting your side significantly and that provides flexibility going forward. I now can't play Mazurkiewicz, but if I were to reinforce with post-70s starters I can free up a slot by playing Mazurka instead of Chilavert. It's actually quite clever... if there are more rounds ahead!Interesting lol
How was Mazurka Gilmar's 2nd choice? Or do you mean Chilavert?I wanted two as well, but Anto picked my 2nd choice keeper, so I went with another centerback as a sub. It could be helpful to have a pre and a post '72 keeper for the reinforcements later.
I wanted Chilavert, yes.How was Mazurka Gilmar's 2nd choice? Or do you mean Chilavert?
What I still don't understand is what was the need to pick van Hanegem when Cerezo was available. Better for the role, better fit with the other two, no issues with the Krauts behind him, wouldn't have ended up scrambling for non-Europeans at the end... Bizarre really. Theon must have been mesmerised by something he read or saw about him, no idea what exactly.
You are somewhat underrating Cerezo's passing there and it's not like you need Hollywood balls really with the rest of your personnel. Yes, van Hanegem is a tad better there but Cerezo has other attributes on him which are particularly important in that position.Because he's a better player than Cerezo and I wanted his far better passing in midfield. The square was always going to miss Falcao's passing otherwise.
Maybe that I really wanted him? I don't go around trying to get the most highly rated player still available and at risk of getting picked in each turn, it leaves you at the mercy of what everyone else does. I plan a realistic side that makes sense to me and which I know how I can go about improving later.Everyone will find other picks strange but not everyone bangs on about it the way you do. I mean picking Ghiggia at round 5 seems incredibly bizarre to me, not sure what you were thinking there.
Wait until you see the full plan!I still think it's a bit mental that you have a draft plan. Has everyone something like that? I had an idea, a few names in my head, which went then in a .txt file and well a bit luck (or not) .
It's not too different. Bear in mind I only put it together after the first two turns as by then you have a pretty clear idea of what is no longer available and where you should be heading.I've never ever had any plan like that. I plan positions, not names and for me more important is the depth in each position. For example in a draft I would decide to go for a midfield 2 first and attack later, sometimes vice versa. If a draft has plenty of good wide players I'd rather pick a fullback or both early. Et cetera.
It takes very little time, what takes some time is drawing up the list of players to begin with, what takes the most time is sitting around waiting for people to pick!!!!!!I can't even imagine having the time to do something like that.
It's probably a famous quote but I had never come across it before:
"Look at that little fat chap. We'll murder this lot."
-England player on Puskas, before the game at Wembley
Rescheduled
1st round
Match 1,2 - 7 Jan
Match 3,4 - 8 Jan
Match 5,6 - 9 Jan
Match 7,8 - 10 Jan
Would this be ok with you Cal, Crappy, Anto? the rest?
I can understand why Anto did that. I will plan if I have the time, but not to the same level of detail. This time round though, I have been too occupied to even jot down names in a spreadsheet or anythingI still think it's a bit mental that you have a draft plan. Has everyone something like that? I had an idea, a few names in my head, which went then in a .txt file and well a bit luck (or not) .