Fred is one of the most underrated players in England

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,342
The hate Carrick got on the CAF was just ridiculous. It was only after he retired that people really started to appreciate him
Anyone hating on Carrick is beyond clueless. The only constant in our midfield in the clubs most successful period ever.

Imagine Carrick at his peak in this side. Would transform the midfield entirely.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
Anyone hating on Carrick is beyond clueless. The only constant in our midfield in the clubs most successful period ever.

Imagine Carrick at his peak in this side. Would transform the midfield entirely.
Yup. He would be the first name on the team sheet. No doubt about that.

Edit: I often think coaches like Carrick who were super talented players must find it incredibly frustrating to work with players who are levels below what they could do.
 

MikeeMike

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 7, 2017
Messages
592
Yup. He would be the first name on the team sheet. No doubt about that.

Edit: I often think coaches like Carrick who were super talented players must find it incredibly frustrating to work with players who are levels below what they could do.
Is Fred’s shooting better/worse than Carrick?
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
Is Fred’s shooting better/worse than Carrick?
Worse by the biggest distance I can physically describe. Carrick only shot when it was ‘on’ and it rarely ended up row Z.

Without checking I would say most of his goals for us were probably long range. He wasn’t a specialist by any means but much better than Fred.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,342
Is Fred’s shooting better/worse than Carrick?
Fred can press and run faster than Carrick.

That’s literally it. Carrick is miles ahead of him as a footballer, it’s not even close. Fred would be lucky to make the bench for the majority of the sides Carrick played in.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,117
Location
Where the grass is greener.
He would look better alongside a proper DM who is good on the ball but then we lack creativity without Pogba
What on earth would be the point of someone as technically woeful as Fred next to a DM? What would he possibly offer except taking up a space on the field that could be filled by someone who can create and score goals.
 

Ace

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
4,384
Location
Colorado
What is going on with the Carrick comparisons? Comparing one of our most technically and tactically sound midfielders with Fred?

While we’re at it lets compare Dan James to Giggs, or Lindelof to Ferdinand...
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,744
What on earth would be the point of someone as technically woeful as Fred next to a DM? What would he possibly offer except taking up a space on the field that could be filled by someone who can create and score goals.
I would rather he was just a backup and we had Pogba alongside a new DM but just don't think it will happen
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,371
The hate Carrick got on the CAF was just ridiculous. It was only after he retired that people really started to appreciate him
I think that was during the back end of the 11/12 season that people appreciated him more but especially the 12/13 season where he was by far the best midfielder in the league that year. Had a very good first year with Van Gaal too.

Prior to that he was a good player but he was never elite at that time- we used to chop and change a lot in the midfield in those days, and It was never a surprise to see anyone of those midfielders left out. He was also outshone by Scholes, Fletcher and Giggs in various seasons between 06-11.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,285
Location
Hope, We Lose
Hmmmm.......but the last time I looked he is playing for a team that's second in the league? Don't understand how fans comment on things that we don't know, yet seem to offer a factual view on things that we don't. Not sure why there seem to be a fixation about Fred when aside from Bruno and Shaw, there a questions about nearly every other player. He is what he is, just seems to be the scapegoat for teams current form causes he not playing well (amongst others) too....
Probably because some of those question marks are question marks themselves. It says more about the poster than the player. For example people who dont rate AWB and cant give him credit and think hes a question mark. Thats not on him, thats on you.

However with Fred we a few midfielders who are different to him, but have performed better than him in the same position. McTominay and Pogba. Matic has had certain games where hes come in and done well. And then Fred has obviously had his own matches where he's done above his average performance. But overall, other than a lot of running and good pressing numbers Fred leaves a fair bit to be desired in his role
 

Martialfc

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Messages
314
Carrick was unbelievable I can’t even believe people are mentioning Fred in the same breath as him. I’ve slated Fred for months in here and often been told to shut up. He’s so average it’s untrue. The only thing I’d say he has is effort, but put me in the starting 11 and I’d give you effort. He’s one of the worst Brazilian players I’ve ever seen. 0 flare to his game, can’t head pass or shoot. Our recruitment is shocking half the time we just never seem to get it right.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,162
Is Fred’s shooting better/worse than Carrick?
That's like asking who's better at crossing the ball, Bebe or Solskjaer?

One has proved repeatedly that he can't do it, the other is not well known for it but when called upon, is surprisingly proficient at it.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,753
Location
india
The hate Carrick got on the CAF was just ridiculous. It was only after he retired that people really started to appreciate him
You also have to keep in mind how high the standards were back then. People had from Robson to Keane to Scholes. The club was used to elite midfielders at the time and Carrick was a definite step down although still an excellent footballer. Now that we as a club have not just taken a step down but fallen off a cliff, Carrick himself looks like a towering figure we wish we had. Which is fair, as for most clubs he is absolutely that - excellent player.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,017
I like Fred’s tenacity, which is not one of the first characteristics when you think of our other players, but he’s woeful beyond all belief in the last third. Solid squad man who’s a net plus for us, but he should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Carrick.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,117
Location
Where the grass is greener.
I actually dislike watching him, which sounds a bit harsh, but I think he holds us back, he's so frustrating to watch, and just makes me nervous due to how reckless he is, both on the ball and when making daft challenges usually on the edge of our box. He'll do something great, a brilliant interception putting us into a great position to attack, then the next thing he does with the ball will be absolutely woeful.

We massively need an upgrade. People go on about Effort FC but he's probably the biggest example of it, he clearly gives a feck and puts a shift in and I love that aspect, but his actual qualities are so limited.
 

Dr Fink

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
606
Location
Purgatory
Fred is the most improved player under Ole in my opinion. He’s done well, however, if we want to win things, we need an upgrade. In the middle of the park, we need a ball winner (a DM) and a player next to them who can do this but also pass.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,264
I’m a fan of his but his recent form has been poor again. It’s harder to defend. People will say that’s what he always plays like but there have been patches where he’s almost been a one man midfield press behind Bruno and that would be impossible to keep up in every game. It’s not easy on the eye but it’s effective.
Def been poor over the last month or so but his game and his profile with some fans bit like Martial and Pogs, the vultures are always circling in wait for 'I told you so' coments.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,264
Probably because some of those question marks are question marks themselves. It says more about the poster than the player. For example people who dont rate AWB and cant give him credit and think hes a question mark. Thats not on him, thats on you.

However with Fred we a few midfielders who are different to him, but have performed better than him in the same position. McTominay and Pogba. Matic has had certain games where hes come in and done well. And then Fred has obviously had his own matches where he's done above his average performance. But overall, other than a lot of running and good pressing numbers Fred leaves a fair bit to be desired in his role
I think he does more than pressing and running but I know that's what suits the narrative. I guess it's all about opinions but for some strange reason with Fred's 'running around' we win more games (or don't lose as many) when he plays. I think more than probably 90% of the players and he generally plays in the big games. For all the 'running around' he's probably got more MOTM performances than Scott, Matic and Pogs put together. People have amnesia and forget post Bruno when last season there was no Pogs, Matic and Scott for long periods. Last season when we were beating city home and away etc, have a look at Fred's ratings.

Not saying he's prime Carrick but I'm old enough to know Carrick wasn't rated by many fans and was seen as slow, safe and didn't tackle. He was an excellent player but the bar at Utd was set significantly higher then. To be honest, none of these players would start for Utd based on that period. It's always funny how players 'worth' is better assessed when they stop playing. Perception is a strange thing than fact and history has lots of Fred's often questioned due to their limitations but for managers and those that play with them, the teams not the same without them. For me, my focus is more on those players whose ceiling is significantly higher yet fail to turn up. If they did (or he) this discussion is very different and maybe Fred is on the bench.
 
Last edited:

Jordy888

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 4, 2021
Messages
5
Cannot believe people are comparing Carrick and Fred. Heart in mouth every time Fred has the ball. Carrick could control a game, Fred can't pass.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Seem to remember one or two shots ib carricks whole career that didnt go over the bar
That’s some memory you have. He barely ever shot, but going by Premier League stats he scored 24 times from 239 shots. Fred has 1 from 78. It was a ridiculous question.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,425
I think that was during the back end of the 11/12 season that people appreciated him more but especially the 12/13 season where he was by far the best midfielder in the league that year. Had a very good first year with Van Gaal too.

Prior to that he was a good player but he was never elite at that time- we used to chop and change a lot in the midfield in those days, and It was never a surprise to see anyone of those midfielders left out. He was also outshone by Scholes, Fletcher and Giggs in various seasons between 06-11.
Yep Carrick was a good player....that’s all, he wasn’t a great player or misunderstood but he had a great season in 12/13. Other than that he was part of a team that had a word class keeper, 3 of the back 4 were world class, Giggs and Scholes were world class as were Ronaldo and Rooney. It wasn’t due to Carrick that we won so much. If we’d had 11 players on Carrick level we wouldn’t have. All those players were levels above him.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,425
That’s some memory you have. He barely ever shot, but going by Premier League stats he scored 24 times from 239 shots. Fred has 1 from 78. It was a ridiculous question.
Safe is how I’d describe him. The shot in the 08 CL final, no conviction just hit the target straight at the keeper....big chance and he just hit the target, if only it fell to someone else.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Safe is how I’d describe him. The shot in the 08 CL final, no conviction just hit the target straight at the keeper....big chance and he just hit the target, if only it fell to someone else.
I’d rather it fall to a player like Carrick than a player like Fred every day of the week. He generally tried to pass the ball in and he was by no means a great goal scorer, but he was much better at it than Fred.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,425
I’d rather it fall to a player like Carrick than a player like Fred every day of the week. He generally tried to pass the ball in and he was by no means a great goal scorer, but he was much better at it than Fred.
Id agree with that. Fred’s zero composure.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,453
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Carrick is still a better midfielder than Fred and he retired 3 seasons ago.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,264
Not sure where this Fred v Carrick has started from. Carrick is a far better player as is 90% of the players and 100% the manager at that time. Conversely at some point, he was 'the Fred' of the forum by many fans at that time too but the bar was set considerably higher. For Carricks ability, he didn't have than many England caps too. His game was probably better suited now than it was back then....no such thing as a CDM back then especially when 4 4 2 was the formation of choice, he couldn't get around the pitch, was one paced, didn't score enough goals or assists.
 
Last edited:

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife
That’s some memory you have. He barely ever shot, but going by Premier League stats he scored 24 times from 239 shots. Fred has 1 from 78. It was a ridiculous question.
At that rate he will score a handsome 3 goals in as much games. That’s good returns.
 

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife
Fred can press and run faster than Carrick.

That’s literally it. Carrick is miles ahead of him as a footballer, it’s not even close. Fred would be lucky to make the bench for the majority of the sides Carrick played in.
Better comparison would have been Fletcher for their high energy.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,342
Not sure where this Fred v Carrick has started from. Carrick is a far better player as is 90% of the players and 100% the manager at that time. Conversely at some point, he was 'the Fred' of the forum by many fans at that time too but the bar was set considerably higher. For Carricks ability, he didn't have than many England caps too. His game was probably better suited now than it was back then....no such thing as a CDM back then especially when 4 4 2 was the formation of choice, he couldn't get around the pitch, was one paced, didn't score enough goals or assists.
He didn’t get England caps because England had completely incompetent managers. England should of won a World Cup or Euros with the squad they had.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Better comparison would have been Fletcher for their high energy.
Fletcher was a much better player.

a better comparison would be Djemba x 2.

obviously he was an utter flop, but so would Fred have been in that team, as the team and midfield in particular was far better than today.
 

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife
Fletcher was a much better player.

a better comparison would be Djemba x 2.

obviously he was an utter flop, but so would Fred have been in that team, as the team and midfield in particular was far better than today.
Both Djemba and Fred are paint guns, whilst Fletcher one would would say an AK.