Frenkie de Jong | The last muppeting lap

Frenkie to United?


  • Total voters
    2,033
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,303
Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
Because everyone who writes anything on twitter or says anything on any TV channel is always believed. That's what people want to do nowadays
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
17,010
Location
England:
Those blue wankers over at The Shed End are really laying into us. Laughing and saying they are taking FdJ and Ronaldo from us.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
I want to find that video last season of Tielemans losing the ball and literally walking back towards his goal, hasn’t been good for a season, was average before that.

neves is a poor option unless you are buying a monster dm. Neves/Fred will get absolutely murdered.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,142
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Those blue wankers over at The Shed End are really laying into us. Laughing and saying they are taking FdJ and Ronaldo from us.
Bit weird to think Ronaldo is going there still isn't it, and also to be excited by the prospect! Fair enough if they believe the De Jong stuff, they're wrong, but bless them.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,087
Frenkie is the right target for us in terms what the squad needs to become more competitive with the top two in the league. There's no doubt about that, and there's also no doubt that the alternatives we might have in mind, such as Neves or Tielemans, would bring us less than what we need although either would still improve us.

The complications however, are vexing. The one that troubles me is the potential impact on the rest of the squad of paying a new player 350-400k/week.

But if we look past that and go straight to the football side of things, adding FdJ would give us a squad that can at least give Chelsea a run for third place and IMO walk away with the EL trophy.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,884
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
She's been incredibly reliable throughout her career. Her track record is why her reports have some weight to them. Just because she's in Sky Sports doesn't mean that she becomes unreliable now.
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
32,987
Location
Love is Blind
She's been incredibly reliable throughout her career. Her track record is why her reports have some weight to them. Just because she's in Sky Sports doesn't mean that she becomes unreliable now.
Fair enough. I don't know much about her and majority of reporting on Sky Sports is complete nonsense and speculation.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,978
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Really? I didn’t know that. So they are going to pay Memphis but not Frenkie?! Wtf is that about?
I could be wrong, but I believe they are just letting Memphis go for free with the idea that his next club can then give him a higher wage (or a signing bonus) since they won't have to pay Barca a transfer fee. Barca won't actually be paying Memphis anything. Of course it depends on Memphis finding the right offer so that he's then happy to release Barca from their part of the contract.
 

Wrecking ralf

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Messages
436
Not sure i get the hate with Neves. I've always seen him as a very suitable Matic replacement. But a better version of what we bought initially. Hes not immobile, great passing range, good positional awareness and is decent his tackling ability. Of course Frenkie would be a much better signing in ability and adaptability to our team given hes played under Erik previously. But Never would definitely be a good addition. Especially when you consider we have players in Donny, Eriksen and Bruno who can drop deep but operate further forward. Even fred who has looked brilliant in pre season would flourish with Neves next to him given that he himself isn't a proper holding midfielder. I think he'd offer so many options in our midfield without the worry about the defence being exposed.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
Why does Reddy's reporting carry any weight, isn't she Sky Sports?
She's the senior reporter at sky sports right now. You look at every interview with managers and players - she's the one conducting them 1 on 1. She's always around the club and has always been very reliable and knowledgeable in the past with Liverpool, but is now seemingly working on United. But she obviously has her sources.
 

Orton

Ati-virus, keeps missing the n button
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
18,979
Location
bonnie wee Scotland
Why? Surely Neves/Fred is significantly better (both on the ball and defensively) than the Fred/McTominay combo we've mostly used for the last couple of years.
They are significantly better. Don’t see how anyone can deny that.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,370
Location
Salford
I wouldn’t mind Neves as a plan B, but Wolves supposedly want 60-70m

I think I’d prefer United just throw 10-20m into the De Jong deal (signing on fee / up front fee) and get it over the line
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,233
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
I wouldn’t mind Neves as a plan B, but Wolves supposedly want 60-70m

I think I’d prefer United just throw 10-20m into the De Jong deal (signing on fee / up front fee) and get it over the line
The biggest problem with Neves is the price wolves would demand for him. He’s going to be FDJ money or more.
 

Strootman's Finger

New Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,661
Would prefer Konrad Laimer as a backup, and he'd cost about 1/3 of Neves. In fact I would prefer him in addition to FDJ, but we can't even get one done.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
Why? Surely Neves/Fred is significantly better (both on the ball and defensively) than the Fred/McTominay combo we've mostly used for the last couple of years.
Whilst neves has more quality than mctominay he has no energy, pace or ability to chase down. Mctominay is garbage but Fred/neves will get walked past so easily. It was bad enough with a player who is at least athletic. Neves is like an oil tanker and needs someone to do all the covering and work, Fred is not that player.
 

Nytram Shakes

cannot lust
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
5,279
Location
Auckland
Personally I’m not sure of neves as an alternative, think he is great in a counter attacking team, would have been a really good signing for Ole or Mourinho, but a high energy team that needs to move the ball quickly not sure. I haven’t seen that side of his game. Doesn’t mean he can’t do it, but very diffrent kettle of fish to De Jong.

Personally think we would be better of waiting and doing some more in depth scouting for a year if Neves is the only alternative.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,870
I wouldn’t mind Neves as a plan B, but Wolves supposedly want 60-70m

I think I’d prefer United just throw 10-20m into the De Jong deal (signing on fee / up front fee) and get it over the line
I think we're prepared to get the deal over the line with more money but obviously waiting until the last minute to try and save a few million. The backups could be legit or just us saying, sorry Barca, we tried but your wage issue with Frenkie has broken this deal down, we're moving on. I think we'll end up paying more to get the deal over the line in the end. It's a bluffing game at this point. How bad does Barca want to sign more players and how bad to they need to sell Frenkie to make that happen. The new reports of them wanting to offload Depay and Dest are not making their position look good at the moment.
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
4,901
First of all, I think it's worth letting you know that your tone is very patronising and condescending.

He's the back-up. De Jong is still the target, but you need back-ups on your list in case the first target is unavailable. Or you end up with potentially nothing. Chelsea will be going through a similar thing due to them missing out on one or two of their targets, as well. It happens at all clubs. Sometimes you get your first choice, sometimes you don't.

As for Neves, you yourself have just said that he is a marginal improvement on what we currently have. The whole point of a transfer window is to improve the quality of your first 11, as well as add depth to the side. We no longer have Matic or Pogba in midfield, so our only real current option is McTominay and Fred. The players need upgrading and if Neves is one who fits the profile, then that's great for us.

If Mane's talent was evident for a long time, then why did we not commit and get him? Or Real Madrid? Or Bayern Munich at the time? What about Van Dijk? Or Kevin de Bruyne when he was at Wolfsburg? Asking "who else is in for him?" is not a valuable metric whatsoever to decide whether a player is worth going for or not. It's useless. You look at what the player can offer and you build a picture of what they can bring to the team. Then it's down to the club to go out and get the player. By the same token, why aren't City or Liverpool in for de Jong? Why isn't Bayern Munich looking at him? Or Juventus, or one of the Milan clubs? It's logic that just doesn't hold up.
No. The point is for this team to eventually challenge for the top honours, not improve marginally. Just being better than what we have is not a criteria. We need a midfielder that resists pressure and can receive and progress the ball. Ideally, pair that with a second defense minded midfielder. Neves does none of that good enough to be considered. And certainly not at the price Wolves will ask for him.

We were in for Mane the previous summer, but Southampton straight up denied us. The next one we were in along with Chelsea and Liverpool the next and he went to Liverpool. He himself admitted later on he had other offers on the table. No one is in for Neves particularly due to the value compared to the price tag. He doesn't justify it. For a top club he would be worth a punt as a depth player for 30-40M. Even that is a bit much now that I think about it. That's it. But that is not what we need. We need quality proper.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,924
People complain about lowering standards and then want to sign Neves for big money :houllier:
 

Strootman's Finger

New Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,661
I can't see EtH wanting Neves, he won't suit his style. I think this is similar to the CB situation, Torres/Neves are the club targets Martinez/De Jong were EtHs. Hopefully EtH has his own backup.
 

Strootman's Finger

New Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,661
Previous quotes from wolves put him at 90m reckon an actual bid of 60-65m would be needed
But then it turned out that literally no one anywhere across Europe actually wants him... so I am quite confident that price would come down.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
But then it turned out that literally no one anywhere across Europe actually wants him... so I am quite confident that price would come down.
Why they don’t need the money, don’t want to sell, he is on a contract? What need do they have for 45m??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.