Frenkie de Jong | The last muppeting lap

Frenkie to United?


  • Total voters
    2,033
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,668
Location
Sydney
So they are removing players from the tour who they want to leave but Frenkie isnt one of them.
they’re trying to sell him without paying what they owe, right?

presumably there is a point of contention there and if they left him out of the tour, they’d weaken their own stance in that “negotiation”
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,139
I think of these "Levers" as like the beer pumps in the pub, but instead of beer flowing out, it's Barcelona's credibility.
I was thinking more of Squid Game, where you pull a lever and a pot drops cash. Only a matter of time until they get killed though
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
His wage is only increasing, Barcelona aren't creating new money but borrowing future earnings, De Jong would be new money and he isn't necessary.
That makes sense, thank you.

I can see why they're pushing hard for him to go, especially seeing as though Xavi has players he'd rather have over him too
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,833
A bit odd now that ETH has such tunnel vision for this player, I'm not sure too many would be that bothered if we'd left this a while ago. People would have snapped your hand off for Neves and Eriksen in early June, which seems perfectly doable.

The fact we're hearing we could let this roll on until after the season has started is a bit worrying, as the longer we let it go the less chance we will be able to sign an alternative.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,480
Location
Salford
That makes sense, thank you.

I can see why they're pushing hard for him to go, especially seeing as though Xavi has players he'd rather have over him too
My understanding from reading/listening to journalists who I believe are reliable, is that it’s the Barcelona board who want to sell De Jong, but Xavi wants to keep him

I’m sure the decision to take him on tour is Xavi’s and the board would have rather left him out
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,889
They are selling off TV rights (over 25 year period )for a short term cash injection.
Is it a one and done over this period or is it a recurring injection over the 25 years? Seems like a long time to leverage TV rights with the inflation over the past few years.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,551
Is it a one and done over this period or is it a recurring injection over the 25 years? Seems like a long time to leverage TV rights with the inflation over the past few years.
Any inflation over an agreed amount goes to Barca
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
My understanding from reading/listening to journalists who I believe are reliable, is that it’s the Barcelona board who want to sell De Jong, but Xavi wants to keep him

I’m sure the decision to take him on tour is Xavi’s and the board would have rather left him out
Not too sure as i've also read reports that Xavi likes him as a player but does understand that he needs to be sold for financial reasons, and given the options he's got in the squad, he's happy for de Jong to go
 

RDCR07

Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
30,410
Location
Transfer Forum
They've made the statement based on signings thus far, up to Lewandowski.

For Silva & Kounde to arrive also I assume they would need to sell / raise further funds to register absolutely.
Interesting. I guess we ll see how it plays out over the next 30 days.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,415
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
A bit odd now that ETH has such tunnel vision for this player, I'm not sure too many would be that bothered if we'd left this a while ago. People would have snapped your hand off for Neves and Eriksen in early June, which seems perfectly doable.

The fact we're hearing we could let this roll on until after the season has started is a bit worrying, as the longer we let it go the less chance we will be able to sign an alternative.
It reminds me of LVG and his love of Kevin Strootman. Allegedly Strootman so vital to LVG’s system at the WC that he even called postion #6 the Kevin Strootman role.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
You have to wonder how much effect the Martinez deal has had on slowing this down a little.
I think United have done all they can on this deal at the moment. It's just upto Barca to get their stuff in order. Maybe when this lever is activated, they'll pay his wages and he'll be gone, giving them the funds and FFP wiggle room to sign Silva at the very least, especially if a fee has been agreed already
 

Keefy18

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
2,653
You have to wonder how much effect the Martinez deal has had on slowing this down a little.
It's the other way around?

We spent too much time on this deal and Martinez price went up a few mill.

Murtough & Arnold were in Spain prior to the Martinez agreement.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,339
Location
Cooper Station
It's the other way around?

We spent too much time on this deal and Martinez price went up a few mill.

Murtough & Arnold were in Spain prior to the Martinez agreement.
I just think it’s interesting we agreed the price on Frenkie first and it seems Ajax have gotten more out of us. Could be possible that United wanted to know how much they would be committing to Frenkie before moving to finalise Martinez
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,627
Location
Manc
This is a waste of time, granted it’s interesting following the summer drama but there comes a point where you draw the line.

It’s already got to the stage where United are over paying…and the bloke still isn’t arsed about playing for United.

ETH…Move on please!
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
This is a waste of time, granted it’s interesting following the summer drama but there comes a point where you draw the line.

It’s already got to the stage where United are over paying…and the bloke still isn’t arsed about playing for United.

ETH…Move on please!
Move on to who? This is the player which ETH wants. There arent that many players who can do what FDJ does. We will give it that as much time as it is possible because alternatives may not suffice for ETH style of play.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
This is a waste of time, granted it’s interesting following the summer drama but there comes a point where you draw the line.

It’s already got to the stage where United are over paying…and the bloke still isn’t arsed about playing for United.

ETH…Move on please!
You don't know whats said in private though. It's been suggested that he's been advised to say he wants to stay to ensure that Barca give him what he's entitled too.

EtH has obviously recieved assurances that he wants to come when all the problems have been sorted and i don't imagine that personal terms will be difficult to sort at all
 

seegoblu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
286
The structure of the contract was reported at some point. Now lets say that we are talking about deferred compensations, then we are talking about earned wages that have not been paid yet, it's a fairly easy situation for De Jong and wouldn't require much negotiations in fact the quickest way to get that money or to be able to go to court would be by accepting to leave the club, as long as Barcelona are solvent which they currently are. To me everything points to unearned wages.
I’m confused, now you’re saying there was reporting done by the press that supports your belief that the wages weren’t deferred but were forgiven in exchange for an increased wage in a new and improved contract….but are at the same time saying that the press that is currently reporting the issuing being non payment of deferred wages (which doesn’t support your opinion) is less credible? To me it seems as if you are just choosing to believe the reports that support your position while discrediting those that contradict you.

Perhaps you are more litigious than I am, but for me the first step in negotiating a release from a contract is not to run to a court but to engage in a negotiation with your counterparty. I posit that what we are witnessing is the negotiation of the release, through the press. It has everything to die with the deferred wages, as well as loyalty bonuses and perhaps whether De Jung’s deferred wages should also include an element of an interest rate as well.
 

Daslogisch

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2014
Messages
654
Location
Holland
Supports
Ajax
I just think it’s interesting we agreed the price on Frenkie first and it seems Ajax have gotten more out of us. Could be possible that United wanted to know how much they would be committing to Frenkie before moving to finalise Martinez
This could be the case. Dutch media also confirming VDS stepped in to speed up the Martinez deal. I think VDS told United's representatives to pay up or shut up and stop unsettling the player. Otherwise I can't explain how United have out of the blue raised their offer to this amount after weeks of lowballing.
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
Is it a one and done over this period or is it a recurring injection over the 25 years? Seems like a long time to leverage TV rights with the inflation over the past few years.
Rumour is that it is capped at current value and will not increase if the TV revenue go up. For example if revenue is 100m at the moment then they will pay 25m for next 25 years even if the TV revenue go up. But it hasn’t been confirmed
 

Keefy18

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
2,653
I just think it’s interesting we agreed the price on Frenkie first and it seems Ajax have gotten more out of us. Could be possible that United wanted to know how much they would be committing to Frenkie before moving to finalise Martinez
They had stronger negotiation on the back of selling Haller & Gravenberch.

Money in the pocket so demand more for any other players also leaving.
 

Filip#6

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
43
Move on to who? This is the player which ETH wants. There arent that many players who can do what FDJ does. We will give it that as much time as it is possible because alternatives may not suffice for ETH style of play.
I think we will go all in for FDJ, but surely there have to be other players capable of playing Ten Hag -ball. If not it will be a few tough years ahead and maybe he will have to tweak the model.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,339
Location
Cooper Station
Rumour is that it is capped at current value and will not increase if the TV revenue go up. For example if revenue is 100m at the moment then they will pay 25m for next 25 years even if the TV revenue go up. But it hasn’t been confirmed
Hope it fecking skyrockets :lol:
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
I just think it’s interesting we agreed the price on Frenkie first and it seems Ajax have gotten more out of us. Could be possible that United wanted to know how much they would be committing to Frenkie before moving to finalise Martinez
The thing is, it was reported a while ago that Barca would accept a deal of €75+€12 straight away, and coincidently thats very close to what we've agreed now.
I think we've paid higher to accommodate the Lewandowski signing as Bayern wanted a fixed, up front payment for him (even though they won't see a penny of our cash until they sort the de Jong wage issues out)
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,339
Location
Cooper Station
They had stronger negotiation on the back of selling Haller & Gravenberch.

Money in the pocket so demand more for any other players also leaving.
I’m more referring to the figures mentioned in the last few days by various sources. All of a sudden now it’s gone up an extra €10 million or so.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
You don't know whats said in private though. It's been suggested that he's been advised to say he wants to stay to ensure that Barca give him what he's entitled too.

EtH has obviously recieved assurances that he wants to come when all the problems have been sorted and i don't imagine that personal terms will be difficult to sort at all
I keep seeing this but why is it obvious? Isn’t the fact Barca need to sell and a promise to force him out if a fee is agreed as likely as De Jong wanting to come here? Why wouldn’t United agree to that and wait it out even if the player is currently unwilling to move?
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,339
Location
Cooper Station
The thing is, it was reported a while ago that Barca would accept a deal of €75+€12 straight away, and coincidently thats very close to what we've agreed now.
I think we've paid higher to accommodate the Lewandowski signing as Bayern wanted a fixed, up front payment for him (even though they won't see a penny of our cash until they sort the de Jong wage issues out)
Yeah that’s a possibility too.
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,600
they’re trying to sell him without paying what they owe, right?

presumably there is a point of contention there and if they left him out of the tour, they’d weaken their own stance in that “negotiation”
In what way would that weaken their stance? My reading of this is that the player has basically said he's not budging, as he doesnt want to leave and is owed potloads of money,. He's in the tour squad so they dont waste a good player and if he's in training and playing then that just supports his position at the club.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
Yeah that’s a possibility too.
If it is the case, then it tells me that this is much more advanced than we think, and the going on tour thing is because he's still legally their contracted player.
Still i don't think it is unfortunately. It would be nice to think so, and i do wonder how they've managed to find that much cash to pay Bayern as a fixed fee, especially after agreeing a fee with us with a higher fixed amount which would cover the Lewa fee.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
In what way would that weaken their stance? My reading of this is that the player has basically said he's not budging, as he doesnt want to leave and is owed potloads of money,. He's in the tour squad so they dont waste a good player and if he's in training and playing then that just supports his position at the club.
How do you figure?
Even still, they need to keep him match fit, in case he doesn't actually leave. He was always going to go on the tour, regardless of a fee being agreed or not. His position at the club is that he's not wanted and that, apparently, Xavi likes him as a player but he has other players that he prefers over de Jong and understands that he needs to be sold for financial reasons. So at best, his role would be a rotational squad player at the very best i'd imagine if he stayed
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,339
Location
Cooper Station
If it is the case, then it tells me that this is much more advanced than we think, and the going on tour thing is because he's still legally their contracted player.
Still i don't think it is unfortunately. It would be nice to think so, and i do wonder how they've managed to find that much cash to pay Bayern as a fixed fee, especially after agreeing a fee with us with a higher fixed amount which would cover the Lewa fee.
I never really doubted that he’d go on tour. I don’t really consider that a significant development because as you say he is still a Barca player and the deal is not close to being done. I don’t really think him being on tour with them is an obstacle in any way either though. I’m sure United expected him to go.
 

Keefy18

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
2,653
It started at €40m. Should have finished the deal in early June.
It was £40m, not €40m.

Arsenal were very close to agreeing the deal at £40m, we offered £45 with - £5m approx in add ons.

Whatever has happened in the last week we've now jumped up £54 / €64m.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.