mehro
Ass face
I didn't give them much attention, just assumed they were pigeons, probably part of your porn collection.
It's obviously because they are English.No, because Instant Karma is a closet gooner and a Carrick, Rooney, Scholes hater.
Did you notice the different senses of 'giving somone a chance' employed?So to support a point about people who collectively could be described as a group who won't give OH a chance, you use a quote from someone who quite clearly does want to give him a chance, just like the majority of people in the thread actually. And this is somehow a coherent argument? You're in danger, like the thread, of disappearing up your own arsehole. And how welcome would that be?
If you have a frozen peacock and it's a fairly young one you should really cook it.
Maybe I should do what I did with the peacock... fecker's still in the freezer
Or perhaps just use the ignore button.
You really are THE most boring poster on these boards.Did you notice the different senses of 'giving somone a chance' employed?
No - thought not! So here it is again.
1 'We'll give him some time before we pass final judgement' - admirable of itself - and your own view. In this sense - 'not giving someone a chance' means not waiting.
However, whenever you make a judgement, it is very important how people weigh eviddence and make those judgements.
2 Best portrayed in the negative: 'We'll always interpret his play in the worst possible light' and use that portrayal when making our judgements whenever they are made. (Eg. he mustn't run around so much - but he mustn't be more static either.)
This sense is the important one - and the one I addressed - since if this type of prejudice is occurring it doesn't really matter if time is given or not.
Hence the second type was the one on which I concentrated. You are right to mention your intention to adopt the first - but your contribution helped constitute an example of the first. more important, one which I clearly indicated in those posts.
Please do not confuse the two senses in your next post.
In that case, whilst I can see the 'paranoid' refs - I can also completely understand someone's annoyance that you choose to use the genocidal Nazis top describe them as opposed to some other paranoid delusional characters.Yeah it was a film - a cracker and well worth a watch - about Hitler and his entourage in the bunker as the Red Army closes in, becoming increasingly paranoid and refusing to admit the reality of the situation around him. And then totally losing it when Goering betrays him. That was the reference, completely missed by Two-Teams.
Ok - let's take a quick look at this 'joke'...If OH had done his job properly, Vidic and Brown could have nipped off for a quick cup of tea. End of.
Let's see - kf wants to say because he is 'giving a chance' in one sense, I should not use the other part of his post to point out that a group of posters are not 'giving a chance' in another sense. Why?You really are THE most boring poster on these boards.
Just give it a rest ffs.