VP
Full Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 11,557
4000 posts
Mods close this thread before it meets its next mile stone, its degenerated into shite and is now getting a tad sick.
And because surely, after 4000 posts, 101 pages, 20 different arguments, 200 insults, 5 accusations of racism and 1 disturbing GIF, we can finally agree thatNo, because Instant Karma is a closet gooner and a Carrick, Rooney, Scholes hater.
And because surely, after 4000 posts, 101 pages, 20 different arguments, 200 insults, 5 accusations of racism and 1 disturbing GIF, we can finally agree that
Owen Hargreaves is not the next Roy Keane
And because surely, after 4000 posts, 101 pages, 20 different arguments, 200 insults, 5 accusations of racism and 1 disturbing GIF, we can finally agree that
Owen Hargreaves is not the next Roy Keane
"I know Jamie, even I think this thread has gone on for too long."
I'll see you on page 200.So, after 4000 posts, which is the better pairing, Scholes-Hargreaves, Carrick-Anderson, Carrick Fletcher, Fletcher-Hargreaves, Carrick-Scholes, Scholes-Fletcher, Scholes-Anderson....I need to know
I'll see you on page 200.
Ooooh I can't be arsed reading all that. What page?I know you love to deny things you said - like even in this thread denying that you said that it's only the goalkeeper and defenders who are responsible for stopping goals being conceded, when you clearly had said it.
This is another of those. In this thread, you clearly suggested we let Saha go for nothing, even paying out his contract for him:
https://www.redcafe.net/f9/ferguson-back-hunt-182179/
By which time we will have signed another central midfield player.I'll see you on page 200.
Um is that directed at me? I meant that since we've decided nothing thus far it would take at least that long to answer that question.
Well we don't appear to be playing a midfield two anymore.So, after 4000 posts, which is the better pairing, Scholes-Hargreaves, Carrick-Anderson, Carrick Fletcher, Fletcher-Hargreaves, Carrick-Scholes, Scholes-Fletcher, Scholes-Anderson....I need to know
By which time we will have signed another central midfield player.
Not you honey. Sorry for the ambiguity. Directed at the whole thing. And no matter what we would decide here, Fergie would decide something else. With the midfield players we have now it's any three from five on any day. And to be honest I don't mind any of the combos.Um is that directed at me? I meant that since we've decided nothing thus far it would take at least that long to answer that question.
(By the way the answer is Scholes and Carrick)
Thanks love, just checking.Not you honey. Sorry for the ambiguity. Directed at the whole thing. And no matter what we would decide here, Fergie would decide something else. With the midfield players we have now it's any three from five on any day. And to be honest I don't mind any of the combos.
I just find this thread hilarious.
Thanks love, just checking.
X
You already condemn yourself with your lame attempt at trying to look clever. I haven't denied what I said. I clearly talked about the summer, when I said that.I know you love to deny things you said - like even in this thread denying that you said that it's only the goalkeeper and defenders who are responsible for stopping goals being conceded, when you clearly had said it.
This is another of those. In this thread, you clearly suggested we let Saha go for nothing, even paying out his contract for him:
https://www.redcafe.net/f9/ferguson-back-hunt-182179/
That was on the 17th January. I think you were suggesting we let him go for nothing in the summer, but the point still stands.
So please spout all you like but don't deny things you have clearly said.
Red Indian Cheif Torn Rubber said:Not really. He is currently just filling up squad space while doing next to nothing. If this continues till the summer. We have to get rid. At all costs..
"I never won the UEFA Cup with Bordeaux, you moron."
I wasn't misquoting you Chief, I was just quoting you. And it wouldn't have been to suit any 'ends' as clearly there is no end - surely you know this by now. The thread will go on for ever.You already condemn yourself with your lame attempt at trying to look clever. I haven't denied what I said. I clearly talked about the summer, when I said that.
Proof
Ekeke is instead suggesting I meant we should release him with immediate effect. Just like you. But don't let such facts get in the way of your trying to look clever. When you and him are just misquoting me to suit your own ends.
surely you know this by now. The thread will go on for ever.
I think it tells us that some people are comfortable with conducting 'debate' in a particular way and get annoyed when someone wants to do it differently.FS, you've managed to get in a protracted bickering session with noods, who's pretty much universally liked and before this thread has probably not had a tiff with anyone on here in four or five years... and kf, who in his entire life has only once crossed swords, and that was with an intransigent peacock.
I wonder what that tells us...
The only problem here is that the author of that remark, Noods, said his Keane point was meant to indicate that the chief had praised OH so highly it was the equivalent of saying he was better than Keano - which does rather make it relevant to the 'robotic keano' one.I wasn't debating those points. Simply the robotic Roy Keane one. That is why I did not use those examples.
The same way neither I or anyone else said strikers get paid to stop goals.
Yeah right. You are supporting someone who is basically claiming I wanted Saha released, with imediate effect, on the very day we got a 7 million pound offer for him. Insisting I said that. Which clearly isn't what I said. So you tell me what the feck I should call what your doing? If it isn't misquoting.I wasn't misquoting you Chief, I was just quoting you. And it wouldn't have been to suit any 'ends' as clearly there is no end - surely you know this by now. The thread will go on for ever.
Really getting rather defensive here aren't you?So. You don't see the "dishonesty" - your choice of word - of using my quote to support a generic view of those who won't give OH a chance contradicting each other when in the quote you use to support your argument I make it very clear that I am prepared to give him a chance?
I used 'think' because it is my opinion. I don't really see the remarks quoted as racist (possibly a bit insensitive though 0 hence lacking in taste -see above).You don't think? Seagulls, have you seen Downfall by the way (which is what the reference was to)? I'm guessing Chief hasn't, but you usually seem pretty rounded in terms of knowledge etc.
How can anyone NOT say that Hargreaves was substantially responsible for Arsenal's equaliser this season? He tries to challenge Fabregas (one of the ball players that he is apparently meant to be stifling) but then lets him go free and instead dashes off after the ball like a headless chicken, despite the fact cover is there. Then, when he's reached Adebayor, he just stops, allowing Adebayor to run into the area free. Adebayor causes the damaged, Fabregas, completely free, passes the ball into the net.
Awful awful stuff, and this in apparently his best game for us
at 1.12
Oh well, despite normally being happy to give other posters the benefit of the doubt (honest), if you insist you're not, I'll believe you."Shh, IK, Chief and FS, I'm not that good really."
The chief did say only the back five have the job of stopping the other side scoring goals - because he wants to draw the distinction that others (having other jobs as well) merely have the task of helping the back five to do theirs.Ooooh I can't be arsed reading all that. What page?
I got as far as Two-Teams claiming that Klass was a better finisher than Van Nistelrooy and switched off.