TheReligion
Abusive
Silly commentImagine if Chelsea get Haaland, City get Kane and we end up with Ings.
Silly commentImagine if Chelsea get Haaland, City get Kane and we end up with Ings.
This really is what a Liverpool fan would have been saying in the 90s, 00s and 10s.Totally appreciate what you’re saying but we are still Manchester United, not some tin pot club. We are a big draw for any player.
its really not the same. Were Liverpool one of the biggest spending clubs in the world?This really is what a Liverpool fan would have been saying in the 90s, 00s and 10s.
Somehow clubs like Chelsea , Man city were able to become big attractions when they come into some money but Manchester United one of the biggest Clubs in terms stature and financial might is doomed to eternal irrelevance because we had some lean years why would anybody move here it beggars belief.its really not the same. Were Liverpool one of the biggest spending clubs in the world?
And we end up with Sancho rather.Imagine if Chelsea get Haaland, City get Kane and we end up with Ings.
That's the point I was trying to make. They have so little ambition that they'd be prepared to sell their club captain and talisman to the current league champions. You wouldn't see other top four clubs like United, Liverpool, Chelsea doing similar.They aren’t within shouting distance of Manchester city. They aren’t competing with them. They’re competing with the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh place teams.
Do you think Levy would sell to United (or any top four club) or loan him to City for a season as some of your fans have suggested?Still don't think he is going anywhere this summer. Next summer will be a different matter though.
I don't think Levy would sell to anybody in England. Also who the hell said LOAN him to City!?Do you think Levy would sell to United (or any top four club) or loan him to City for a season as some of your fans have suggested?
Various Spurs fans have suggested it on the Mighty ***** forum, plus there's a tweet from a supposed Spurs fan above saying the same.I don't think Levy would sell to anybody in England. Also who the hell said LOAN him to City!?
I actually think Bruno would be fine giving the penalties away as long as it strengthened the team and made it more likely we'd win titles. Which getting Kane obviously would do. However if Kane then missed a couple of important penalties then the shit might hit the fan (but his record is also very good).There is a 100% certainty that he won’t be a penalty taker. We already have one that doesn’t need a replacement. Besides, OGS wouldn’t accept if player’s personal ego contradicts with what is better for the team
I think if Kane is set on staying in England he would have to maybe not this year but next year, I thought Kane wasn't suppose to try to push for a move publicly either but all noises seem to suggest otherwise .I don't think Levy would sell to anybody in England. Also who the hell said LOAN him to City!?
Madrid will be more likely to go for Haaland or Mbappe rather than Kane.I'm firmly in the Kane to Madrid camp but why not Liverpool? They have some money and they sorely need a good finisher. He's decent on the ball and the pace of Mane and Salah will only accentuate his strengths
And they were right?This really is what a Liverpool fan would have been saying in the 90s, 00s and 10s.
The club hold the power this summer because of his contract and also the covid financial situation. Next summer though the power will sit with Kane with 2 years left on his contract the pressure will be on.I think if Kane is set on staying in England he would have to maybe not this year but next year, I thought Kane wasn't suppose to try to push for a move publicly either but all noises seem to suggest otherwise .
Liverpool consistently brought in some pretty big players all throughout that time.This really is what a Liverpool fan would have been saying in the 90s, 00s and 10s.
Liverpool have relied on sales for their big signings. It would be surprising if they came up with the cash.I'm firmly in the Kane to Madrid camp but why not Liverpool? They have some money and they sorely need a good finisher. He's decent on the ball and the pace of Mane and Salah will only accentuate his strengths
I am hoping that we'll get Sancho but I won't be surprised if we end up with a couple of pound shop signings instead. Everything seem pointing to that direction. The super league had gone tits up, Woodward's puppet had been appointed DOF and he'll be flexing his muscles on some bargain signings, Bailly and Cavani were given contract extensionsAnd we end up with Sancho rather.
I wouldn't really mind, Chelsea might win one title before they implode, they've done this several times before. People were also shitting their pants when they signed Werner, Havertz, Pulisic etc.
The contracts are there to ensure both parties' interests are protected, nothing more. Spurs may not have to sell Kane due to the length of his contract, but we don't know what he was promised in private when he signed his last extension.The club hold the power this summer because of his contract and also the covid financial situation. Next summer though the power will sit with Kane with 2 years left on his contract the pressure will be on.
I mentioned this a couple of days ago but he probably was more confident then as he thought Edi was leavingYou would think City are the clear favourites but there is just that nagging feeling, even Keane a while ago was talking up Kane to United for no apparent reason.
That interview though, that's basically a come and get me plea.
A few performances like the last game and you might wish you'd trousered the 80m and re-invested it.Still don't think he is going anywhere this summer. Next summer will be a different matter though.
They don't though. They made their VD and Allison signings based off that ludicrous Coutinho fee.I'm firmly in the Kane to Madrid camp but why not Liverpool? They have some money and they sorely need a good finisher. He's decent on the ball and the pace of Mane and Salah will only accentuate his strengths
I can see it now.29 next summer, time to get out the slippers.
Agree with this bit but it's still a huge risk. If they get it wrong they'll be set back by at least 5-10 years. Barca did this with the Neymar money and I'm sure Spurs are more than capable of screwing up as well (remember the Bale money? Eriksen, Chadli, Paulinho, Capoue, Lamela Soldado -- all very highly rated back then)But most importantly, what do Tottenham/Levi are actually aiming to achieve by keeping Kane for at least another season? A few years ago, during peak Pochettino years it may have looked like Spurs were on the verge of something big, but they never actually won anything. Then some players left, others got old, and new arrivals didn't live up to the expectations. This current squad is clearly not good enough to compete for the top four spot, let alone be a title contender and needs serious cash injection plus rebuild.
If he signs for City, my fpl is screwed. He was one of consistent goal scorer in my team
Kane’s got the most goals and assists in the league playing with Højbjerg and Ndombele behind him. He’d be a monster in our team.Just a quick question to our fans who want to sign him do you not worry about the lack of supply line behind him
I'd be massively worried at his tendency to spend more time pissing about on the half way line by the game.Just a quick question to our fans who want to sign him do you not worry about the lack of supply line behind him
Erm, Rashford Pogba Bruno Greenwood. Now compare that to who Kane has feeding him at Spurs while being top of both goals and assists chartsJust a quick question to our fans who want to sign him do you not worry about the lack of supply line behind him
I know it sounds crazy but would be fully on board IF by some miracle we got Varane too but no chance we could afford bothErm, Rashford Pogba Bruno Greenwood. Now compare that to who Kane has feeding him at Spurs while being top of both goals and assists charts