Jesus H Christ...Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
3 years since that tweet went up. We can't even imagine how out of control inflation is.
Jesus H Christ...Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
3 years since that tweet went up. We can't even imagine how out of control inflation is.
hence why i can't take "transfer fee" moralising seriously. there are probably 10+ factors that have lead to this hyper inflation and it doesn't help we are in this dire situation. The moralisers on these threads acting like fees should've static for X numbers of years need to either suck up the fact we need to pay these fees or just accept the chuckle brothers, or an academy prospect.Jesus H Christ...
Basically this.Great post this.
Since Moyes spell we simply haven't been negotiating in a position of strength I'm afraid. City seem to be able to do some reasonably priced deals these days but we're in that frustratingly weak negotiating position. We either go into next season with players who can now be labelled serial failures, else we risk academy players, or we overpay by 20-25m quid.
If we grab Maguire at 75m (25m overpriced) and AWB at 50m (15m overpriced), we simply have to suck it up and understand that six years of failure does that to a team. Much of that extra 40 million outlay could be recouped by selling off some fringe players or players that OGS doesn't feel suit his system.
if the choice is overpay, or go into next season with the same shit defence that has failed us for years, I say, let the fecking Glazers overpay!
By signing those two we will go into the season with a defense just slightly less shitttt than what we have .Great post this.
Since Moyes spell we simply haven't been negotiating in a position of strength I'm afraid. City seem to be able to do some reasonably priced deals these days but we're in that frustratingly weak negotiating position. We either go into next season with players who can now be labelled serial failures, else we risk academy players, or we overpay by 20-25m quid.
If we grab Maguire at 75m (25m overpriced) and AWB at 50m (15m overpriced), we simply have to suck it up and understand that six years of failure does that to a team. Much of that extra 40 million outlay could be recouped by selling off some fringe players or players that OGS doesn't feel suit his system.
if the choice is overpay, or go into next season with the same shit defence that has failed us for years, I say, let the fecking Glazers overpay!
The only issue is that it's wrong. You don't have to pay for the simple reason that this current market is out of whack, the fees tell you nothing about the quality of players, you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m. The key is to evaluate properly otherwise you end up with the likes of Fred and Lukaku. It's important to remember that Van Dijk is an exception more than the rule.hence why i can't take "transfer fee" moralising seriously. there are probably 10+ factors that have lead to this hyper inflation and it doesn't help we are in this dire situation. The moralisers on these threads acting like fees should've static for X numbers of years need to either suck up the fact we need to pay these fees or just accept the chuckle brothers, or an academy prospect.
Simple.
Seems to be a real dearth of talent when it comes to centre backs right now, with the majority of the best settled at top clubs.I can't believe that in world football there isn't another defender that's better than Slab head for a fraction of the price quoted.
There might well be plenty, but it'll be a risk or at best a Lindelöf/Bailly type signing that will take 12 months or not work out at all.I can't believe that in world football there isn't another defender that's better than Slab head for a fraction of the price quoted.
Would definitely accept that bet, see no reason whatsoever why Lindelöf would be replaced.If we sign, I'll happily bet £20 it's Lindelof who will losing his spot in the first XI.
Lindelöf isn't slow?But they are both slow
Yeah but we were the only club paying that kind of fee for Lukaku, that's his point. You're saying "you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m" but aren't most of those examples either gambles/risks a la Lindelöf/Bailly, or players that aren't interested in joining us because there are better options for them?The only issue is that it's wrong. You don't have to pay for the simple reason that this current market is out of whack, the fees tell you nothing about the quality of players, you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m. The key is to evaluate properly otherwise you end up with the likes of Fred and Lukaku. It's important to remember that Van Dijk is an exception more than the rule.
Yet all we are working off is either second hand whispers or briefed information from shaky journos that paints a picture that our club has likely scouted 1-4 options in a graded order. They aren't looking outside those options. They have likely evaluated De Ligt/Koulibaly as top tier, Maguire down from that, Alerweirald down from that.The only issue is that it's wrong. You don't have to pay for the simple reason that this current market is out of whack, the fees tell you nothing about the quality of players, you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m. The key is to evaluate properly otherwise you end up with the likes of Fred and Lukaku. It's important to remember that Van Dijk is an exception more than the rule.
Or we buy a Bailly/Lindelöf/Rojo/Blind type and chance it again.Hence, you either pay stupid fees for the players you want, play the chuckle brothers, or put an academy prospect next to lindelof. There are no other options based on the limited understanding we have of the clubs policy.
but even then, they were likely bought because of some form of shortlisting process. they were players we wanted. JPRouve seems to be implying (correct me if i'm wrong), well if we get down to Maguire on the list and is too expensive, there are similar players in at a range of prices. All valid points. But that's not how the process works as far as i've been lead to believe from numerous interviews etc etc. If we feel that Maguire is way too expensive, the club then moves down to the next target, they don't re-scout a whole bunch of new players around the same ability level as the player they missed out on.Or we buy a Bailly/Lindelöf/Rojo/Blind type and chance it again.
I'd much prefer we actually replaced Vidic or Rio properly after 6 fecking years.
Bring in Toby and Maggie for £100m and put the chuckle brothers in the ressies to help us get promoted again in the u23syeah great, he isn't as good as Van Dijk, he cost a fortune. So we either go pay 133m pounds for Koulibaly, 80m pounds for Maguire, 20-30 million for Alerweirdald in the last years of his "prime", or we play the chuckle brothers that shipped OVER 50 feckING GOALS IN ONE SEASON.
We are in a shit position, everyone knows we have money, no one needs to sell. We are always going to be fecked over by these clubs.
So in theory, either buy one of these stupidly priced players, play the chuckle brothers, or put an academy prospect next to Lindelof and pray not to concede more that 60 next season.
And my point is that we shouldn't do it while he clearly stated that we should accept it, in my opinion his point of view is extremely bad, he is basically justifying our current incompetence. Personally my issue with Maguire is exactly the same than I had with Lukaku, while they are above average players I don't think that they are good enough to justify their fee long term and we will quickly find ourselves in a situation where we have to replace an extremely expensive player, which as we are seeing now is a very effective way to waste years and money.Yeah but we were the only club paying that kind of fee for Lukaku, that's his point. You're saying "you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m" but aren't most of those examples either gambles/risks a la Lindelöf/Bailly, or players that aren't interested in joining us because there are better options for them?
Ahh see this is where we might have got the wires crossed. I'm not saying spend the money because we are desperate, i'm saying if Ole wants Maguire/Koulibaly then pay the 80 or 133 million pounds. We can't moralise over fees if these are the shortlisted candidates.We should never spend big because we are desperate, it should be because we are convinced that the target is perfect, even if it's not actually the case. When desperation is part of the conversation like it is in this thread then people should realize that something is properly wrong in their evaluation of the player.
80m for Maguire is the last option I'd go for.yeah great, he isn't as good as Van Dijk, he cost a fortune. So we either go pay 133m pounds for Koulibaly, 80m pounds for Maguire, 20-30 million for Alerweirdald in the last years of his "prime", or we play the chuckle brothers that shipped OVER 50 feckING GOALS IN ONE SEASON.
We are in a shit position, everyone knows we have money, no one needs to sell. We are always going to be fecked over by these clubs.
So in theory, either buy one of these stupidly priced players, play the chuckle brothers, or put an academy prospect next to Lindelof and pray not to concede more that 60 next season.
But it's not moralising, people are mainly disagreeing with the worth of the player in relation with his level and long term impact on the team. People aren't that bothered about De Ligt's fee and I don't think that Koulibaly is the equivalent of Maguire.Ahh see this is where we might have got the wires crossed. I'm not saying spend the money because we are desperate, i'm saying if Ole wants Maguire/Koulibaly then pay the 80 or 133 million pounds. We can't moralise over fees if these are the shortlisted candidates.
If Ole and Ed want those players, i'm saying the fan base has to give up on transfer fee moralising. If they don't want to pay those fees, then either stick with the chuckle brothers or risk an academy player are likely our only options.
He is. Ideally, you'd need some bit of pace in central defence.Would definitely accept that bet, see no reason whatsoever why Lindelöf would be replaced.
Lindelöf isn't slow?
Completely Valid. I just don't think Ole or Ed see it that way.80m for Maguire is the last option I'd go for.
I’m with you here, think JP has completely misunderstood the point.Ahh see this is where we might have got the wires crossed. I'm not saying spend the money because we are desperate, i'm saying if Ole wants Maguire/Koulibaly then pay the 80 or 133 million pounds. We can't moralise over fees if these are the shortlisted candidates.
We could get defenders who are as good as him for half of that price. Maguire isn't so good that we have to break the world record.Completely Valid. I just don't think Ole or Ed see it that way.
Who @Mcking ?We could get defenders who are as good as him for half of that price. Maguire isn't so good that we have to break the world record.
This has very little to do with what I said or what WPMUFC initially said. I clearly talked about the relation between fee and player's level, I didn't talk about the list nor did I suggest that it was a one man decision. So, don't talk for me.I’m with you here, think JP has completely misunderstood the point.
Of course we should only overpay if we are convinced the player is the right one, he must be someone on a very short shortlist of players.
It appears Maguire is target number 3 on our CB list and that’s exactly where I’d have him also. Just because JP or anyone might not agree with that list (as I didn’t with Lukaku), it doesn’t mean it’s ”wrong” as such.
No doubt Lukaku was a player Mourinho desperately wanted, but I’m hoping it’s a transfer committee that has decided on the RB & CB shortlist this Summer and not one man, as that’s where our previous issues have arisen, not where JP thinks.
There are plenty, Maguire is no VVD he’s not going to transform our defence or be anything like as good despite costing more money. He’s also quite a big risk and not suited to playing a higher line if that’s what Ole does want to do.I can't believe that in world football there isn't another defender that's better than Slab head for a fraction of the price quoted.
He's not slow at all. I'm not saying he's a speed demon or anything like that but he's definitely not slow. He doesn't get outpaced or outran often, certainly no slower than Citys centre halves for example.He is. Ideally, you'd need some bit of pace in central defence.
And “player’s level” is something based solely on your own opinion.This has very little to do with what I said or what WPMUFC initially said. I clearly talked about the relation between fee and player's level.
Which is the point, our opinions about the transfer as fans.And “player’s level” is something based solely on your own opinion.
Who are we to decide that a fee is too much is a transfer committee decides this is one of their top targets and the fee is within budget?
That’s the point, it becomes a huge issue if it’s one man deciding (Mourinho) as you can end up lumbered with players a new manager may not want in his system. I’m not convinced on AWB, much more convinced on Maguire but if the transfer committee consider him RB target number one and the fee is within budget, damn right they should push it through.
Let’s take a step back...Which is the point, our opinions about the transfer as fans.
No, the point was, if the club have identified Maguire as a top target, then they should spend, even if they have to spend 40% more due to negotiating in a position of weakness.“JPRouve” said:We should never spend big because we are desperate, it should be because we are convinced that the target is perfect, even if it's not actually the case. When desperation is part of the conversation like it is in this thread then people should realize that something is properly wrong in their evaluation of the player.
De Ligt, Koulibaly and Maguire are not of the same quality, and we have to pay what we think is a suitable price for a player of Maguire's level. If none of De Ligt, Koulibaly and Maguire could be gotten for suitable prices relative to their quality and the market, then other options should be considered.Who @Mcking ?
I’m really interested to know the CB’s as good as Maguire that we could get for 37-40m?
It’s also your opinion, and JP shares it. However, what do you both say if the transfer committee and Ole has decided on a 3 man shortlist for a commanding ball playing CB that they are convinced will be a great player for us, in order:
De Ligt, Koulibaly, Maguire
De Ligt choses Barca, Koulibaly gets priced out at 130m. Should we not pursue target number 3 and get him if we feel he’s within the club’s extremely large budget? That’s a question for both of you, regardless of your own personal opinion on the player?
First don't cut posts and change the context and secondly the quote clearly states the conversations in this thread and my opinion.Let’s take a step back...
No, the point was, if the club have identified Maguire as a top target, then they should spend, even if they have to spend 40% more due to negotiating in a position of weakness.
He isn't the slowest centreback in the league, but he is slow for a defender. Pairing him with Maguire would make it even worse.He's not slow at all. I'm not saying he's a speed demon or anything like that but he's definitely not slow. He doesn't get outpaced or outran often, certainly no slower than Citys centre halves for example.
So you’ve got one name and it’s a guy who’s ”meh” on the ball?As for other defenders we could get ahead of Maguire, half of the price does not necessarily mean £40m. The likes of Manolas has been quoted for prices below £40m. We could get a defender better than Manolas for 10m-20m above that. I'm convinced that we've got some good scouts beyond the tunnel vision. Maguire isn't so good imo
He isn't slow for a defender ffsHe isn't the slowest centreback in the league, but he is slow for a defender. Pairing him with Maguire would make it even worse.
The entire debate has been about overspending for our top targets because of the position we are in, the only one attempting to change the context here is you JP because you have mixed in your own feeling and valuation regarding Maguire.First don't cut posts and change the context and secondly the quote clearly states the conversations in this thread and my opinion.
You started mixing in other players that are better and cheaper, but we were never talking about that as it’s fan opinion based. We have simply been debating that United are likely to have to overspend to get their top targets. The other choice is to gamble on a player who’s not a top target and then we’re back doing another patchwork Bailly/Rojo/Blind/Lindelöf job, or we gamble on the academy.The only issue is that it's wrong. You don't have to pay for the simple reason that this current market is out of whack, the fees tell you nothing about the quality of players, you have players with roughly the same level going for fees that ranges from 20m to 60m. The key is to evaluate properly otherwise you end up with the likes of Fred and Lukaku. It's important to remember that Van Dijk is an exception more than the rule.
So please list these centre backs that we can pick up for 50-60 million.De Ligt, Koulibaly and Maguire are not of the same quality, and we have to pay what we think is a suitable price for a player of Maguire's level. If none of De Ligt, Koulibaly and Maguire could be gotten for suitable prices relative to their quality and the market, then other options should be considered.
As for other defenders we could get ahead of Maguire, half of the price does not necessarily mean £40m. The likes of Manolas has been quoted for prices below £40m. We could get a defender better than Manolas for 10m-20m above that. I'm convinced that we've got some good scouts beyond the tunnel vision. Maguire isn't so good imo
You'd take Koulibaly (a similar standard) for 53m more?80m for Maguire is the last option I'd go for.