Ole's_toe_poke
Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,846
Hmm...well Louie said we need to find a role for Scholes.
He'd still do a better job than Fellaini.Hmm...well Louie said we need to find a role for Scholes.
Caf meltdown. While we're at it Young and Valencia on the wings.I guess
----Jones----
Herrera--Fellaini
will be the midfield in Carricks absence and if don't manage to get a good replacement in.
I'd even bring Neville or Butt out of retirement rather than play the Lampshade as first choice. Actually, bring back Phelan and play him instead.Hmm...well Louie said we need to find a role for Scholes.
Powell is better as an AM which is why that pairing fails.I'd rather Powell than any if Cleverley, Anderson, Flecther or Fellaini.
Hopefully it means it will be two instead of one.I think this confirms our interest in another midfielder, Vidal or otherwise. We all thought we would be signing someone, but this pretty much means it's dead on.
Holy cow it better not be.Yeah, so Carrick is out. I guess this partnership is next in line.
Thoughts?
Martinez? How many games did Fellaini play under Martinez then?Well, Van Gaal stated in the press conference today that he's willing to give everyone a chance to see how they work under his philosophy.
Based on how Fellaini played under Martinez; who shares a similar philosophy to Van Gaal, I don't see why Fellaini can't be used as a defensive midfielder next to a dynamic, ball playing midfielder in Herrera. That's how Martinez played him anyway. This is not to say he was anything special at Everton, but he certainly looked a lot more confident on the ball, in a team that demanded at least 4 to 5 options off the ball.
At Man United, his confidence, along with many others seemed to have gone. Players were scared to get on the ball, there weren't always a number options off the ball, which led to players giving it away or hoofing it up the pitch. I have no doubt this will happen under Van Gaal's philosophy.
I'm not going sit here and say Fellaini will be a success under Van Gaal, but i'll be glad if he's given a chance. If Van Gaal's not convinced in about a month's time, I have no doubt he'll be looking to sell him.
Less than five I'd imagine.Martinez? How many games did Fellaini play under Martinez then?
4.Martinez? How many games did Fellaini play under Martinez then?
One third of it does, yeah.----------Fellaini
Cleverley--------Herrera
Looks good.
I like Fellaini but you can't underestimate Herrera.One third of it does, yeah.
Not many, but what I'm trying to say is, the signs were there. Signs of confidence on the ball, good passing, tackling, etc. Those are the signs he's very rarely showed for us last season.Martinez? How many games did Fellaini play under Martinez then?
That has got to be one of the worst midfield pairings in history. It's got Fellaini in it.Yeah, so Carrick is out. I guess this partnership is next in line.
Thoughts?
Our defence needs serious protecting, a midfield of Cleverley and Herrera couldn't provide that.It will be Cleverley - Herrera and this will be the season where Cleverley finally realises his potential. I can just imagine a 5 pass play in the middle of the field between Herrera and Cleverley which results in the ball being played through to an on-rushing Valencia who strikes a sweet ball into the stomach of the opposition RB.
Fix the RW problem FFS, most of our attacks originate down that freakin' side!
You could make a strong argument for any and all of Fellaini, Cleverley, Fletcher and Anderson being sold. We'll have to wait and see which ones LvG thinks are the least useless but I don't think we can be certain that Fellaini will leave.That has got to be one of the worst midfield pairings in history. It's got Fellaini in it.
No but seriously, that clearly won't work. And surely van Gaal will send Fellaini packing anyway.
Would you not say it depends more on how we set up? Even if someone hates Cleverley (which I'm not saying you do) they cannot deny that he keeps hold of the ball very well, and Herrera also has a knack for keeping the ball when under pressure. If we were to play a high defensive line utilising a possession based setup, it could work, couldn't it? Both of them are quick across the ground and there were statistics to show CLeveley is very decent as tackling, and we already know Herrera can do it. Couple that with the eagerness of Shaw and Rafael to get up and down the field and I reckon it might just work.Our defence needs serious protecting, a midfield of Cleverley and Herrera couldn't provide that.
I certainly wouldn't argue that it couldn't work here and there, but throughout the entirety of a season it would not suffice as a partnership. We still need a quality addition, at least one, to our midfield.Would you not say it depends more on how we set up? Even if someone hates Cleverley (which I'm not saying you do) they cannot deny that he keeps hold of the ball very well, and Herrera also has a knack for keeping the ball when under pressure. If we were to play a high defensive line utilising a possession based setup, it could work, couldn't it? Both of them are quick across the ground and there were statistics to show CLeveley is very decent as tackling, and we already know Herrera can do it. Couple that with the eagerness of Shaw and Rafael to get up and down the field and I reckon it might just work.
It would require us phasing out wingers and utilising a more Man City-esque attack with Mata and Kagawa being our Silva and Nasri. Could it work? Possibly, but I sill reckon we'll go in for another CM who can spread play.
Yep, completely agree.I certainly wouldn't argue that it couldn't work here and there, but throughout the entirety of a season it would not suffice as a partnership. We still need a quality addition, at least one, to our midfield.
Yup, I agree. Cleverley has a part to play, and it could work against teams in which we will control majority of possession.Would you not say it depends more on how we set up? Even if someone hates Cleverley (which I'm not saying you do) they cannot deny that he keeps hold of the ball very well, and Herrera also has a knack for keeping the ball when under pressure. If we were to play a high defensive line utilising a possession based setup, it could work, couldn't it? Both of them are quick across the ground and there were statistics to show CLeveley is very decent as tackling, and we already know Herrera can do it. Couple that with the eagerness of Shaw and Rafael to get up and down the field and I reckon it might just work.
It would require us phasing out wingers and utilising a more Man City-esque attack with Mata and Kagawa being our Silva and Nasri. Could it work? Possibly, but I sill reckon we'll go in for another CM who can spread play.
I think the only option that does is fletcher, or jones i guess.Our defence needs serious protecting, a midfield of Cleverley and Herrera couldn't provide that.
I don't. I was guessing based on what he must have seen. Not everyone predicting someone's attitude is claiming to have an inside track to their brain, you know. If I say 'I'm sure Cameron is feeling surprisingly positive about his chances in the upcoming election' it doesn't mean I'm claiming to have just had a phonecall with him.How do you know what he wants?