How much of Ole's success is Mourinho's?

Irish Jet

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
2,261
Supports
Anyone but Rashford
Thats 3 of his 11 signings. Suggesting you agree that they're playing better than most of his signings. Thanks
You’re including all 11 so Mkhi is playing better than Mkhi then? haha

Even now Zlatan is better any of those. Matic also. Dalot is 19. Grant a 3rd choice keeper.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,563
Location
Polska
Ole claims it all by bringing oldschool United vibe, the Phelan factor, plus Michael Carrick looks way more involved on the bench than before.

I remember Jose saying he doesn't even know where to fit Pereira in the squad... Ole somehow involves him in another great comeback vs Southampton.

Two different identities. Jose is not Ole and never will have that DNA, therefore 100% kudos for the new one.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,555
Location
Ireland
Jose brought the likes of Dalot, Lukaku, Matic and Lindelof in but Ole is the one that’s got them playing.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Could have locked this thread after the first reply. It’s worth repeating, though.

Fecking zero.
 

Untd55

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,516
I know people do not like Mourinho, but it seems silly not to credit him with anything. The team he took over was poor. That team failed to get into the top four in a season where Leicester won the league, which shows just how weak the Premier League was that season. That is possibly the weakest the Premier League has been in the last two--maybe three--decades. There is no doubt the team he took over was terrible.

Transfers are certainly something that Mourinho should be credited with. I notice some people on here say that Mourinho's transfers were terrible but then say he should have been challenging for the title with the team he has. Which is it? Either the team is good enough and Mourinho's signings were good or the team is not good enough and his signings were bad. You cannot have it both ways.

Pogba, Lukaku, Matic (I think people forget how much we improved with his signing), Dalot, Lindelof, and Fred. He signed four current first team players and a right back with massive potential. Fred is also a highly talented midfielder, who I think will do well if he can settle. Strangely, all but one of those players was 25 and under when he signed them, so it is not like he bought a bunch of oldies.

I know he bought Sanchez, but most people on here were excited about that signing. I think it was certainly worth the risk even though it has not panned out.

Overall, he certainly improved the team. We went from fifth in one of the weakest premier league seasons ever to second in a league that had improved vastly in strength. Manchester City and Liverpool were massively improved last season; Tottenham improved; Arsenal were about the same; Chelsea probably were not that much worse, just the competition had gotten stronger.

We improved a lot defensively under Mourinho last season. I know people say we were good defensively under Van Gaal, but I do not think that is true. The only reason we conceded a low amount of goals is because we held on to possession a lot more. I remember any time we gave it away under Van Gaal our defense and midfield would be shredded by any team. The opposition was almost guaranteed a shot on goal if we gave it away.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,470
Van Gaal taught us how to pass and keep possession and bore the opossition into surrender, Mourinho taught us how to hate, Ole needs massive credit not just for motivating but for tactics an organisation, the nouse he has shown in games particularly against Chelsea, Liverpool and PSG is top draw.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,168
Location
Manchester
First of, I want to be clear that I'm one who was strongly against Mourinho's appointment. In fact, I had not been posting ever since he was made manager, not even when we won the "treble". To me, Mourinho is the
antithesis of what Man Utd is, and I'm relieved as anyone when he was finally sacked.

Our recent victories where we won with less possession and less shots has elicit a lot of comments on the irony of it, that Ole's team are more success at Mourinho's football than Mourinho is at Utd.

This struck me - how much of the current defensive organisation and solidity is down to Mourinho, which Ole inherited?

Case in point, when Roberto Martinez took over Everton from Moyes back in 2013, his first season was seen as a huge success. Everton while still being solid defensively, which is a hallmark of Moyes' reign, were now also good at moving the ball forward. Everton finished that season above us for the 1st time ever since EPL started. I remembered people also using this to deride Moyes for holding Everton back (given how shite Moyes were for us during that season).

However subsequently, Martinez's Everton began to fall apart in the following seasons. It soon became apparent that Martinez has inherited a team that was very well drilled in defensive play by Moyes. Once the Martinez has fully changed Everton to his style, it was very clear that his Everton were an exact mirror of Martinez's Wigan - exciting going forward but porous at the back.

So this comes back to my title - how much of our current defensive play is down to the remnants of Mourinho's training? Will Ole be truly tested (god damn I hate myself for typing this) once he has a full preseason with the team?
It's certainly a possibility which I hope is not the case!

I too have been thinking about Martinez at Everton and once the players relied on him for defensive coaching it all went to pot!
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,298
Depends on how you look at it. If it's as simple as inheriting a squad then LVG deserves credit for Mourinho's trophies won with us. If it's about philosophy, dressing room atmosphere, club culture etc.. then zero is the right answer. Ole had to reverse almost everything to fix the club.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,955
Jose's always been very good throughout his career with signings, so I do give him credit for that. He also made us a consistent top 4 team again after Moyes and Van Gaal's faffing around, so I give him credit for that too.

Pogba, Lukaku, Lindelof, Matic, Zlatan.. all good signings. Dalot is potential, Bailly I can see why he signed him even though I don't rate him, Fred I think will be good. Mikhi / Sanchez were on paper good signings. And he cleared a decent amount of the deadwood too.

I think Jose would make a pretty strong scout actually if he wants to go into that line of work.
 

FrantikChicken

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
2,337
Location
London
To be fair, we're appreciating some of those signings a lot more now we've got a manager who can actually get good football out of them. Had Mourinho gotten his way with Pogba we'd have been asking why he'd broken the world transfer record for a player who was meddling at best. Since Mourinho left, Pogba's become vital to our play. Similarly, Lukaku was being written off as a big money flop but is having a bit of a resurgence lately. Your actual signings can be good theoretically - but if you can't get them to perform, they're still failed signings.

Yeah I don't disagree. My point is he did identify talented players. Matic was similarly said to be past it but has been quite good under Ole, I'd say one of the first on the team sheet when fit
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,870
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Less than zero. Come on Paul, I thought that you were intelligent.
I am.
Even the players he bought, he didn't know how to play them. Absolutely atrocious, way past his sell-by date but knew that before he joined.

United should have got rid of him sooner. He gave nothing to the club. Luckily it didn't go on longer before he destroyed the players and the club even further.
Despise him.
 

Jordielaforge

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
18
I would like my tuppence worth here!
If you look at the current team/squad, there are players that go back to SAF. De Gea, Smalling, Jones. Then there are other players brought in by the subsequent managers including Jose. From Herrera to Shaw to Paul Labile Pogba to Lukaku.
There are players that have come through the system too. Rashford is the shining light, but let’s not forget Pogba is included in that. He’s a United graduate. Jesse, Andreas, Scotty.
SAF, Moyes, LVG, Mourinho all deserve a little credit but that’s just for the signings, which the board approve and EW writes the cheques for.
There is collective congratulations deserved, not just Mourinho.
What Ole, Mike, Carrick etc have done, is coached them on defensive shape, changed the midfield dynamic, changed the complete style of play and instilled belief in all of the squad. They’ve turned the mood on it’s head. They have turned the club on its head. It’s not just good management, it s fantastic management. Who can remember a squad chanting the managers name in the dressing room after a win? Any team, not just us?
We are playing in a Man Utd style for the 1st time in years.
But let us all not forget, Ole IS a successful manager. He has already won the Tippy-leaguey a couple of times and cut his teeth. He could potentially be at OT for years, if not decades like SAF.
The biggest credit MUST go to whoever decided to take a gamble on the Ole/Phelan axis. I think it was a calculated gamble in the 1st place, United had nothing to lose really and I’m wondering if Poch was ‘plan b’ from the off? All hoping this would work. It will have been talked about long before anyone in the public eye knew about it. We all think it was SAF I suppose. I know I do.
 

Foxtrot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2018
Messages
699
Supports
Die Mannschaft
This thread is not going down well. Good luck OP.
 

ExoduS

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
2,605
Location
Serbia
This has to be one of the dumbest questions ever asked. Moaninho deserves 0 credit for Ole's success. 0. Should have been fired after Sevilla debacle and remarks during press conf.
 

Tincanalley

Turns player names into a crappy conversation
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
10,140
Location
Ireland
Great thread for flushing the Caf Ultras. Of course Mourhino and indeed Van Gaal before him contributed to the club, and to the defensive solidity. We had less injuries with Mourhino too, which I find interesting. This does not mean that Ole is not doing a great job. He is. But yea, of course, I am sure the players, even those who dont like him, would agree that he made improvements in some respects.
 

MrSingh2002

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
4,408
Jose made some decent signings and let some average ones leave. It's a contribution to progress but Ole clearly worked with the players better.
 

ravi2

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
9,044
Location
Canada
OP is this something that you truly ponder about?
 
Last edited:

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
Things seem to have fallen perfectly in place for Solskjaer to come in and work his magic. Everything happens for a reason, but thats as far as you can take it really, if you have to find a way to feel good about our last managers post SAF. To talk about if they deserve credit for Ole's work is beyond stupid.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,409
Location
Flagg
He bought in quite a few of the players and we're undeniably much tougher mentally than we were before Jose took over. I think you have to give him some credit for that.

Everything since Ole has taken over though has been down to him and the players.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
He bought in quite a few of the players and we're undeniably much tougher mentally than we were before Jose took over. I think you have to give him some credit for that.

Everything since Ole has taken over though has been down to him and the players.
Both LVG and Mourinho played low risk football and so it might help us do well when we have a good result that they have learned some things from them. In order how to attack and break teams down you need to give Ole full credit though. He has totally changed the way we attack and given us a much more attacking mentality.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,409
Location
Flagg
Both LVG and Mourinho played low risk football and so it might help us do well when we have a good result that they have learned some things from them. In order how to attack and break teams down you need to give Ole full credit though. He has totally changed the way we attack and given us a much more attacking mentality.
I just think more of when Jose took over. We were a team that crumbled at the first sign of pressure or difficulty. There was a game fairly early on in his reign where we were 2-0 down and almost accidentally got a goal back near the end, and our players just moped back to the halfway line as if they were annoyed that they'd now have to fight for the remaining few minutes instead of give up.

By the end of Jose's second season you almost expected us to mount a fightback at 2-0 down. I think it's daft to say he didn't improve anything, but equally he doesn't get credit for the improvements since Ole has taken over.
 

AR87

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,217
Location
believer that Sancho will turn it around
The only thing I will say is that Mourinho built a decent team even though he was the number one culprit of shitting on it.
I had been saying for 18 months that we had the second best squad in the country, to much ridicule. Even though Ole has been outstanding, I don't think we are massively outperforming the talent let that's available to us.
Said this on the pod a few times and in some threads. I think Mourinho still has an eye for talent but zero concept of how to utilize it optimally within the context of modern football strategies and concepts.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,778
Conte won the league after inheriting a Jose squad that finished
tenth. I seem to recall Madrid won the Champion's League the season after he left. It's almost like there's a pattern to these total coincidences...
 

AR87

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,217
Location
believer that Sancho will turn it around
Conte won the league after inheriting a Jose squad that finished
tenth. I seem to recall Madrid won the Champion's League the season after he left. It's almost like there's a pattern to these total coincidences...
He should be on the scouting/executive side of things rather than managing. He has always had a good eye for talent, at every stage of his career. Somewhere along the line he just couldn't figure out how to manage it.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,778
He should be on the scouting/executive side of things rather than managing. He has always had a good eye for talent, at every stage of his career. Somewhere along the line he just couldn't figure out how to manage it.
DoF? As long as it's somewhere else, that would be fine. I actually agree with the poster who suggested he had the demeanor of someone suffering a mental breakdown or midlife crisis. He had the vibe of a man on anti depressants.
 

Dash247

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 17, 2015
Messages
227
Lindelof has been exceptional this season and i am Mourinho is the reason, but he really stepped up. He certainly has to be the most improved player. I hope he keeps this up for years to come.

Mourinho is the reason we have Ole as or manager (caretaker if you will) right now. Have we had a different manager who knows we might have never seen Ole in the club.
 

Rish Sawhney

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2015
Messages
619
Location
State College
Conte won the league after inheriting a Jose squad that finished
tenth. I seem to recall Madrid won the Champion's League the season after he left. It's almost like there's a pattern to these total coincidences...
Yeah it tells us that after working under Mourinho every every manager seems like the best ever. The pattern is Mourinho leaving.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,355
Location
Hope, We Lose
Conte won the league after inheriting a Jose squad that finished
tenth. I seem to recall Madrid won the Champion's League the season after he left. It's almost like there's a pattern to these total coincidences...
Yes.

The pattern is that he goes to clubs that spend a lot of money, with which he achieves less than is desired and is consequently sacked, then the next manager has an easy time achieving more with what Jose failed with as the new manager instantly brings a less toxic environment that the players enjoy more, so they play better.