ThierryHenry
wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Jippy's mate in the main article on the Beeb. Sounds like a good guy.
That you in blue @Sultan?There have been mass complaints about Al Muhajiroon and their different guises from Muslims over many years. We've had threads in the CE forum where I and others were ranting about this group. I had an altercation with one their members on Tottenham Court Rd whilst he was distributing leaflets many years back and was threatened by him verbally. Unfortunately, they have always stayed on the right side of the law and used UK's liberal values to their advantage in avoiding arrest.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Close
I think they just about managed to stay on the right side of the law, but I wouldn't be surprised if the authorities were content to have Choudary at least left on the street in order to keep tabs on the individuals he was associating with.Close
That Twitter account is an excellent narrative of the issues Muslims encountered when complaining about the group. When so many complaints from all angles were not heeded it got to the point where conspiracies began to circle. Many felt the government, media and the police were giving tacit encouragement to this group to give Muslims bad press.
The thing is that flag was considered the flag of Islam prior to ISIS so in itself it doesn't merely represent ISIS. Islamic groups like Al-Mahajaroon and HT were donning the flag prior to ISIS existence.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40168526
As far as I'm concerned, anyone waving an IS flag is dangerous. That should be all that is necessary to take action. No peaceful person would do such a thing.
Very interesting read thanks.
I wouldn't hold my breath and neither should you.This is good. Hopefully this sentiment will catch on.
Also, hopefully this is very publicized to answer those who always ask "but what are mainstream Muslims doing...?"
And prior to the Nazis, the swastika wasn't a symbol of hate, but I'd still consider anyone waving a Nazi flag dangerous.The thing is that flag was considered the flag of Islam prior to ISIS so in itself it doesn't merely represent ISIS. Islamic groups like Al-Mahajaroon and HT were donning the flag prior to ISIS existence.
It's getting to the point where I'm asking that why isn't everyone else doing as much as the UK Muslim community to stop this form of terrorism?Close
That Twitter account is an excellent narrative of the issues Muslims encountered when complaining about the group. When so many complaints from all angles were not heeded it got to the point where conspiracies began to circle. Many felt the government, media and the police were giving tacit encouragement to this group to give Muslims bad press.
It's literally an islamic war flag. It's a copy of the flag that Muhammed allegedly used. It is directly inspired by the concept of battle banners used for military coordination back in the sword and shield choppy choppy days. The Romans marched with eagle standards. The eagle standard was basically the mascot/symbol of a legion. The arabs copied the idea, and the black battle banner or black eagle I think it is, is literally an Arab/Islamic version of a Roman eagle standard.The thing is that flag was considered the flag of Islam prior to ISIS so in itself it doesn't merely represent ISIS. Islamic groups like Al-Mahajaroon and HT were donning the flag prior to ISIS existence.
That is close to where i live - worrying but it smells a bit fishy.Nursery worker stabbed in Wanstead by three women 'who chanted Allah, Allah'
http://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/new...n-who-chanted-allah-allah-1-5051994-1-5051994
Gangs, seizing upon the Islamist angle as an additional fear tactic?
I know its been mentioned in the press and elsewhere but honestly from 8 minutes to getting the call to taking them out is really incredible and while praised still doesnt get the praise it truly deserves.quickly dusted. Very good.
You can make an argument that it is disrespectful given that a minute's silence was held, and it could be easily honoured, but we are back to the whole do Western countries honour any attack in the ME region? If England were playing the US and there had been an explosion a week before in Iraq, there wouldn't likely be a minutes silence....
But there was a minute silence. And they showed complete disrespect. Could they have not stayed on the sidelines and respected what was happening? Could they have not joined in anyway? And there is a direct reference, since Australians were caught up in what happened in London.You can make an argument that it is disrespectful given that a minute's silence was held, and it could be easily honoured, but we are back to the whole do Western countries honour any attack in the ME region? If England were playing the US and there had been an explosion a week before in Iraq, there wouldn't likely be a minutes silence....
Had they been playing England, I reckon they would have honoured it, but a match between Aus and Saudi has little / no direct reference to London.
It was in AUS. If England played in Saudi and didn't honour their dead in a similar manner it would be rightly considered insensitive. Given it's terror they nationally export you could argue they're standing with the terrorists pretty much. They should be fined and banned but it won't happen with all theYou can make an argument that it is disrespectful given that a minute's silence was held, and it could be easily honoured, but we are back to the whole do Western countries honour any attack in the ME region? If England were playing the US and there had been an explosion a week before in Iraq, there wouldn't likely be a minutes silence....
Had they been playing England, I reckon they would have honoured it, but a match between Aus and Saudi has little / no direct reference to London.
Agree it is disrespectful and apologies, I had forgotten that a couple of Australian ladies were killed in London - hadn't realised that link when I posted.But there was a minute silence. And they showed complete disrespect. Could they have not stayed on the sidelines and respected what was happening? Could they have not joined in anyway? And there is a direct reference, since Australians were caught up in what happened in London.
No excuses.
My apologies, I wasn't suggesting you were making excuses, more that there are none. No doubt they'll have some, but after all the good stuff @Sultan has shown us lately, this sort of thing will once again bring negativity.Agree it is disrespectful and apologies, I had forgotten that a couple of Australian ladies were killed in London - hadn't realised that link when I posted.
Not trying to make excuses for their behaviour either.
Isnt it obvious? The Imam above said it.My apologies, I wasn't suggesting you were making excuses, more that there are none. No doubt they'll have some, but after all the good stuff @Sultan has shown us lately, this sort of thing will once again bring negativity.
I'm actually intrigued as to the real reason why they didn't honour it.
I'm not going to go off a Daily Mail report.Isnt it obvious? The Imam above said it.
'They did not stop for a moment of silence because according to Wahhabi Islam - which governs Saudi Arabia - it is not wrong or a sin for a Muslim to kill a non-Muslim. In their eyes the attackers are martyrs who are going to paradise.
'If they stand for a minute of silence, they are against their Muslim brothers who fought for jihad and fought the “infidels”.
There are hundreds of thousands of non-Muslims working and doing business in Saudi. They are some of the closest allies to the West. To say they didn't observe the silence is due to what some claim is plainly wrong.Isnt it obvious? The Imam above said it.
'They did not stop for a moment of silence because according to Wahhabi Islam - which governs Saudi Arabia - it is not wrong or a sin for a Muslim to kill a non-Muslim. In their eyes the attackers are martyrs who are going to paradise.
'If they stand for a minute of silence, they are against their Muslim brothers who fought for jihad and fought the “infidels”.
I agree.So much for respecting other people's cultures then. It's a bit archaic to show disrespect just because they don't do minutes silences themselves.
I know, right? Although the fact he didn't want to let go of their leads with all that traffic around - despite clearly spoiling for a scrap - does show that he has their welfare as a fairly high priority. So even racist scumbags can be a good owner to animals.Poor dogs