Bwuk
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,459
I don't think Giggs would ever of been a world record transfer if we'd sold him. Not that we would of.Yes. Giggs transfer fees were low, even relative to his era, weren't they.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
I don't think Giggs would ever of been a world record transfer if we'd sold him. Not that we would of.Yes. Giggs transfer fees were low, even relative to his era, weren't they.
If you're talking about a 30 yo + Giggs then you might be correct.Of course he is. Bale is just a better player than Giggs overall in my opinion. Personally think our Welshman is often overrated. He was a footballer with great close control and technical ability, more so than Bale - but he didn't affect a result anywhere near as much. Similar to why Bale is comfortably better than Hazard for me, who's somewhere in between a great player and a nothing player himself.
Lentini to AC Milan held the world record transfer fee from 1992 to 1996 at £13 million, then Ronaldo from PSV to Barca (£13.2m) and Shearer from Blackburn to Newcastle (£15m) both broke the record in the summer of 1996. I think its highly likely that Giggs could have surpassed those figures if we'd sold him early in his career, and the big Italian clubs were always rumoured to be interested in him.I don't think Giggs would ever of been a world record transfer if we'd sold him. Not that we would of.
Not sure if that's true, Giggs scored wonder goals for us in critical games, tore apart Juventus numerous times in the CL, at the peak of his career in his 20's he definitely wasn't beneath Bale as far as match winning performances. Hell even in his late thirties Giggs was producing MOTM displays in the Manchester derby.Of course he is. Bale is just a better player than Giggs overall in my opinion. Personally think our Welshman is often overrated. He was a footballer with great close control and technical ability, more so than Bale - but he didn't affect a result anywhere near as much. Similar to why Bale is comfortably better than Hazard for me, who's somewhere in between a great player and a nothing player himself.
Yep. And that's why it's so f*cking insulting when people boost Forest Giggs for the Wales job, as if Wales were so smalltime that Ryan would be doing us a favour.As a Welshman it's no contest - Bale has been unbelievable for us and Giggs never seemed arsed.
Really? Please tell me you meant to spell it this way?Yep. And that's why it's so f*cking insulting when people boost Forest Giggs for the Wales job, as if Wales were so smalltime that Ryan would be doing us a favour.
Oh I think both Giggs and Hazard are certainly more gifted. I just think they have less substance.Not sure if that's true, Giggs scored wonder goals for us in critical games, tore apart Juventus numerous times in the CL, at the peak of his career in his 20's he definitely wasn't beneath Bale as far as match winning performances. Hell even in his late thirties Giggs was producing MOTM displays in the Manchester derby.
Bale I don't think has such a well rounded game to have the longevity of Giggsy, Bale in his 30's will not be able to produce the level of performances Giggs was able to produce at the same age because his game is very one dimensional. Hazard is a superior footballer to Bale but Bale is the more confident and has a better mentality and approach to matches, not sure if that makes him better though. The thing with Bale is his speed gets people excited, seeing him just blow past people I think causes some slight overreaction and overstating of his ability. It's fantastic to watch in full flight but when he's not doing that, it all gets a bit average.
Not to say I disagree with the premise of the thread. Bale has definitely done more for Wales than Giggs ever did. I don't think Giggs is 'truly' welsh to be honest, United were number one for him. With Bale it's basically the opposite.
No way Bale is overrated for his value in this day and age. Scorer of goals in finals and match winning performances. Put it another way if you had 80m in your pocket who would you choose Pogba or Bale.Giggs> Bale as a footballer, the reverse is true for their NT exploits. Bale is pretty overrated for the amount he cost, he's had impact in short bursts at Madrid but equally there have been enough times when his own pedigree has been questioned by those at Madrid. I wouldn't ever have him over Giggs when both are at their prime.
Those are fair and good arguments and I agree with them. I think a lot of it is down to mentality, Sterling is a great example as far as those big moments are concerned, we even saw it last night, he was in a position to score but went for the easier option and passed and it's something he's done in the past a lot, he just doesn't have that confidence or bottle as you said. With Hazard it's similar but it looked like he was coming out of that shell two years ago, he's completely failed to kick on but at least he does look to be coming back to his best again this season.Oh I think both Giggs and Hazard are certainly more gifted. I just think they have less substance.
As a United fan, for instance, there are always players that scare me when we come up against them. From that perspective, my criteria is never who will 'run us ragged' or something like that, it's more about players who I trust to affect the result given the opportunity. Sometimes that is a combination of things like bottle that are in play here. Ultimately, there are many gifted players who don't scare me. They could win man of the match but when the golden chance presents, I expect them to scuff their shot, not take the shot because they are trying to decorate the goal and add an extra pass (Hazard) or just over hit the pass altogether. Sterling used to be one who I'd love the 'big moment' to fall to for example, and De Bruyne has far more substance than Silva, despite less ability I think.
Football was different in Giggs' day I guess, and wingers were not expected to have the output that Bale has now, so perhaps I am being harsh on him. Hazard, however, I do not rate. He's an Arsenal pink football boots player to me, and always seems more concerned at being some sort of footballing poet or perfectionist on the pitch than impacting the result. Cristiano Ronaldo, for instance, is very different to Bale and Hazard. He gets the ball and he instantly looks to affect the game. Hazard prances around.
Kind of an irrelevant comparison that but even so I don't believe Pogba is worth what we paid for, not right now at least. The role of a winger has changed too since Giggs time but in general while he came on and had nice cameos in CL finals and scores goals for an overpowered Madrid in a relatively under-powered league I think he is overrated. Just my opinion.No way Bale is overrated for his value in this day and age. Scorer of goals in finals and match winning performances. Put it another way if you had 80m in your pocket who would you choose Pogba or Bale.
Without checking the stats, I'm sure Kanchelskis used to get a good amount of goals from out wide even back in the day, but I can't recall too many others TBH.Those are fair and good arguments and I agree with them. I think a lot of it is down to mentality, Sterling is a great example as far as those big moments are concerned, we even saw it last night, he was in a position to score but went for the easier option and passed and it's something he's done in the past a lot, he just doesn't have that confidence or bottle as you said. With Hazard it's similar but it looked like he was coming out of that shell two years ago, he's completely failed to kick on but at least he does look to be coming back to his best again this season.
With Giggs, like you said it was a different era for a winger where you weren't expected to do too much in the final third but some of the things Giggsy could do back in the day, I have no doubt were he playing now as a left forward he would hit 15-20 goal a season figures easy.
Aye, he definitely had a lot more defensive responsibility than any wide attackers operating in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 today. The same would apply for other wide players of that era like Luis Figo or Pavel Nedved who were getting about 10 goals a season. And if you go back even further the likes of Robert Donadoni were lucky to get up to around 5 for the season. It's more about the shift in tactics than the quality of the player.With Giggs, like you said it was a different era for a winger where you weren't expected to do too much in the final third but some of the things Giggsy could do back in the day, I have no doubt were he playing now as a left forward he would hit 15-20 goal a season figures easy.
And Giggs was a "star" or "superstar" at one of the truly great club sides in recent memory. Why is being a star at the average Spurs winning the 4th places trophy a bigger deal? Also, why is being a superstar at Madrid any greater than being one at Manchester United?I think he is. And anywhere other than a United forum I think you would get the same response.
Personally I don't think Giggs ever really reached the heights he looked like he was going to. He is a Premier League legend in terms of longevity and he was was a very good player. But where are his real stand out seasons? Where he was one of the best 5 players in the league that season. Beckham, Scholes and Keane always outperformed him for me.
Bale was a star at Tottenham and he's gone abroad and is a super star at Madrid. His peak is definitely better than Giggs for me and what he's been able to achieve with Wales just adds to it. Is he better technical player than Giggs? No way, but what makes him special: pace, power and striking of the ball add to that his approach to the game, he is very aggressive in terms of trying to make things happen and you have a player who has surpassed Giggs for me.
Yeah Kanchelskis was great at getting goals, even at Everton. What a player, great to watch as well. Kewell was a good goal scorer too but he played up front quite a bit or rather just off the striker but yeah generally not many.Without checking the stats, I'm sure Kanchelskis used to get a good amount of goals from out wide even back in the day, but I can't recall too many others TBH.
Off the top of my head, Ronaldo was probably the first 18+ goal wide player/midfielder in the PL. Harry Kewell got a fair few I guess.
Yep and people need to be careful with that before they downplay Giggs in comparison to Bale. That's where stats can be misleading and it's better to actually look at the player, his attributes and overall skill set. Jaffyjoe was mentioning something about pace, power and striking a ball making Bale special. Giggs excelled in all these areas but he couldn't showcase it as often as Bale can because of the shift in tactics and positional set ups. Bale pretty much has a free role and goalscoring responsibility at Real Madrid is placed on him and Ronaldo. That wasn't the case for Giggs.Aye, he definitely had a lot more defensive responsibility than any wide attackers operating in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 today. The same would apply for other wide players of that era like Luis Figo or Pavel Nedved who were getting about 10 goals a season. And if you go back even further the likes of Robert Donadoni were lucky to get up to around 5 for the season. It's more about the shift in tactics than the quality of the player.
Agreed, although it should be said that Giggs' assist stats in particular over an incredibly long period were actually brilliant. From @Mrs Smoker 's brilliant thread in the Utd forum:Yep and people need to be careful with that before they downplay Giggs in comparison to Bale. That's where stats can be misleading and it's better to actually look at the player, his attributes and overall skill set. Jaffyjoe was mentioning something about pace, power and striking a ball making Bale special. Giggs excelled in all these areas but he couldn't showcase it as often as Bale can because of the shift in tactics and positional set ups. Bale pretty much has a free role and goalscoring responsibility at Real Madrid is placed on him and Ronaldo. That wasn't the case for Giggs.
Player focus
Ryan Giggs
This whole project started when I saw the post claiming that Giggs had astonishing 284 assists in his career. Surely, that's hogwash, with his goals, how could he be directly responsible for almost 25% of all United goals? Ridiculous. 100-150 at most I'd say. Didn't help that first two seasons I watched and counted the stats were 1992-93 and 1998-99. He had 5 and 7 in those.
Needless to say, I was dead wrong.
What an astonishing career for the most decorated player in MUFC & English football history. I'd say he was the best United player ever. It was popular on Cafe to say that Giggs never reached the highs Bale did for instance. I'll never agree with that. Especially after watching and re-watching his career in the past month or so. Skilled and fast, a real menace to opponents. And he did it for 20+ seasons.
In the sea of highlight videos, this one really isn't all that bad. More goals oriented though. He was much more than just that.
That is simply mind-blowing. He averaged virtually a goal or assist every second game over a 24 season career at the highest level of the English game...stunning.
The stats don't really bare out this supposed gulf in productivity between Becks and Giggs. From Mrs Smoker again:For me, if a winger is to considered great, he has to make or score or be involved with at the least 0.75 goals per match. As far as much knowledge from stats, from United, only George Best, Cristiano Ronalo and David Beckham match this standard, others don't. Yes, Giggs had his moments, but he was nowhere near as consistent as these 3 mentioned players.
That's 0.55 goals + assists for Beckham per game versus 0.49 for Giggs. Given that Giggs was here for 24 seasons and Becks left when he was still near his prime the difference is negligible.Player focus
David Beckham
About time we dedicate some more space to him. Just how useful he'd be these days when Valencia and Young have 1 in 15 success rate between them. Great long passer, great crosser, shame he left when he did.
How did you know?!Is that because its the one tourney england can't disappoint in?
Outrageous?Bale.
In fact, as much as people will disagree with me on this, is it really outrageous to say Bale is a better player than Giggs was?
Time difference makes it impossible to watch for me. *sigh* Sometimes, when I hear you guys talk, it sounds like I'm missing out on something. If only good entertainment. Neymar sure looked like he had more fun in Brazil, judging from the Youtube videos that I've seen.How did you know?!
Seriously though, I just find the whole tournament more enjoyable as it seems the teams in the Copa are more inclined to attack thus creating a more entertaining game. Plus, they're usually on in the middle of the night for me considering I'm in Manchester so watching games live at that time are always fun.
I'd definitely recommend catching some of the Copa games if you can. Most are a fun watch. Personally, I find international games, for the most part anyway, boring so I may overrate the tournament as international games that are the slightest bit entertaining to me are a God-send!Time difference makes it impossible to watch for me. *sigh* Sometimes, when I hear you guys talk, it sounds like I'm missing out on something. If only good entertainment. Neymar sure looked like he had more fun in Brazil, judging from the Youtube videos that I've seen.
Really? He did so that on a number of occasions you know, like arsenal far cup and JuventusBale is the type of player who can change a game on his own, Giggs was never that player.
With massive regret, I think the only player Welsh fans will really remember will be Gareth Bale. I mean, he has a goal per game ratio of 0.39, which is the same as John Charles and a tenth more than Ian Rush (who we shouldn't forget was a deadly finisher in his day for Liverpool) and yet he is not a real forward like your Ian Rushes of the day. He has changed the way Wales play and he has that self-belief in his own abilities and he has dragged that national team to very nearly winning the Euro 2016. Whereas Giggs had a great club career, Bale is simply doing it on the big stage too and that is what matters. For me, Ryan Giggs was the exception to the rule with regards to speed, reflexes, his turn of pace, his tricks and his dribbles, but I don't think the Welsh population will remember Giggs in the same way they might remember Gareth Bale.Really? He did so that on a number of occasions you know, like arsenal far cup and Juventus
There's always a massive underestimation of Bale's technique. He has superb technique, you don't play for Madrid solely because you can run fast.Giggs was very graceful player whereas Bale is effective, kick and run type player.
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/comments/4r1o94/ryan_giggs_all_the_goals_assists_for_manchester/
If you want, you could say that what Bale did for Wales is an even greater achievement than what Cristiano did with Portugal. I mean, it is not as if Wales have loads of world class players in the team. With the feigning injury bit, I probably would put that down to Sir Alex having a say to keep his players fresh. Just as Arsene Wenger is doing with Ozil and Germany at the moment. Either way, credit to Bale for doing his bit for a small country (don't take that badly) where football isn't really the national sport; yes, I know, you are a supporter of Glamorgan CCC aren't you?Even before we qualified for this Euros I'd wager that every Wales fan would have Bale ahead of Giggs, the fact Bale led us to and performed decently at a major tournament is just the icing on the cake. Giggs never really gave a damn about the national team, he should be top of our attendance and goal scoring records, but without checking I doubt he's even top 10 for either. That in itself tells the whole story, he spent the majority of his international career feigning injury during the international breaks, and then days later turning out in a United shirt.
Giggs is the reason I started supporting United in the mid 90s, but despite that I wouldn't even have him in a top 5 list when it comes to Welsh players...
Who would be your top 5?Giggs is the reason I started supporting United in the mid 90s, but despite that I wouldn't even have him in a top 5 list when it comes to Welsh players...