Is Jadon Sancho really worth the 100 plus million fee?

Status
Not open for further replies.

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,570
I mean I would still like to have him at United and 2- 3 months of bad form doesn’t change that. Greenwood is also struggling after a great last season. However one came from our academy and the other was only attainable for 108 mil £ which is just laughable.
If we can somehow still get him for 70-80 mil (and even that would be high) then great, but anything above that would be daylight robbery.
 

Valencia's Left Foot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
562
Supports
Austin FC, USMNT, Three Lions
Sancho would still be a good player, but given his drop off in form, he will never be as valuable to Dortmund again as he was this summer.

a sensible price for him now would be £60m, and that would still be a massive fee. Dortmund didn’t seem to realise there was a global pandemic.

they probably won’t be able to sell him now, as they have an expectation of a fee that has no grounding in reality.
60 million is about right, maybe 70. I rate Sancho slightly above Pulisic who I think was sold for 60 mil.
 

Widow

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
7,185
Location
Can't spell Mkhitaryan
I honestly wonder what is going through the head of Michael Zorc in regards to Sancho.

They continue to lose revenue during the pandemic with no sign of it coming to an end anytime soon.

This coupled with Jadons and Dortmund's terrible form will only increase the pressure on Zorc to find a deal and sell him. If rumors are to be believed (insert a pinch of salt) Jadon wants to move home and was disappointed a deal to bring him to Old Trafford didn't materialise.

Could we move for him in the summer? What would be an acceptable price for both teams? £50, £60, £70 million?

I'm sure we'll ignite our interest in the coming months.
 

DoomSlayer

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
4,875
Location
Bulgaria
Rashford is better than Sancho. If the latter is worth 100 million, Rashford should be at least 150 million.
 

DeGea

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Messages
1,289
Location
Scotland
Sancho is not worth 100 million. Haaland is. We should wait and see how this season pans out. If Dortmund continue to struggle, I suspect they will cave.
 

PizzaPlanet

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
23
If he wants to come here, make an agreement with the player and his people that he will run down his contract and join us in 2022.

For us this will be preferable both financially and with regards to other negotiations, for the player it will be good not having to live up to the expectations that come with a hundred million euro price tag.

Plus when Dortmund learn about such an arrangement maybe they will want to sell for 35 million or so next summer rather than having their asset walk away for free.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
If you are going to use Lingard, PL player, you might should just use Martial and others. There are lot of players out there good quality one that had poor patch form.
Doesn't hide the fact that he has very poor season so far, no matter who you want to bring along with in discussion.

Look over 99% people think he doesn't worth the money Dortmund is asking for, and everyone thinks this season he has been very poor. You might be the odd here one who think otherwise.

Truth is, he has never prove himself outside BL. There are lots of outstanding top performers in BL who flopped big time in PL over the years, and he couldn't even perform in BL this season (while some of his teammate in Dortmund has been performing brilliantly). So lets not assume he is a guarantee world class player but just suffering from short dip of form. It could be the other way round.
 
Last edited:

Rocksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
1,347
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
He carries on like this and his value drops to 60/70. Worth it at that point. Seems like a bit of a tosser TBH. Seems like United were being generous but realistic last summer. Dortmund have made the mistakes.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
I have to admit I was one of the most insisting posters to claim we should definitely go for him, it may change but its looking like a dodge bullet at the moment. At least for the fee that was asked, I wouldnt even pay 80M for him at the moment. Bundesliga is a paradise for attacking players with teams playing with absurd high lines and giving acres of space.

60M would be a reasonable price for him at the moment wouldn't go beyond 70M for him.
 

Matt851

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
2,129
We have Mata still for the rest of the season. I can see him starting tomorrow perhaps, and he gives us something that nobody else does in that position.
Mata only barely worked at right wing in his prime and he is another player that just wants to cut inside all the time, that might work if our right back was capable of going forward.

I meant a right winger that is capable of getting to the byline as well as cutting inside and who is younger than mata ams therefore able to do a job defensively so they could be trusted in big games. Not exactly sure who i am describing but sure they must exist!
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
I find it staggering that quite a few on here seem to be suggesting that a player’s (presumably temporary) dip in form will adversely affect his transfer value.

I think Dortmund will be getting less than 100 million for him next season but I’m pretty sure that his current blip in form wouldn’t be why. The fact remains that Sancho is a world class talent and we will be on a different level with him in our squad.
I agree he's a world class talent but the market just isn't there at the top end to pay those prices and Dortmund have felt the pinch more than most. His form has also impacted his value in the sense that he is not as desired as he would have been if he had the impact he had in the two prior seasons he had at Dortmund.

As it is, Dortmund have the nightmare scenario of an underperforming player who wants to leave and seemingly one club being in for him, just like us and Pogba. In both instances I think the player's wishes will be met and they'll be sold for less than the selling clubs wanted.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I find it staggering that quite a few on here seem to be suggesting that a player’s (presumably temporary) dip in form will adversely affect his transfer value.

I think Dortmund will be getting less than 100 million for him next season but I’m pretty sure that his current blip in form wouldn’t be why. The fact remains that Sancho is a world class talent and we will be on a different level with him in our squad.
You can when the sample size is so small. He isnt a veteran here with so much credit in the bank. Its 2 great seasons against 1 disastrous season so far.
 

Terminator

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,928
Overpriced or not, we've been lacking a good RW for half a decade now. Crazy how lopsided our attacks are and how we still haven't signed one is beyond me. Terribly run club.
 

Matt851

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
2,129
So? We are talking about this season:
Sancho in BL: 0 goals in 11 games
Haaland in BL: 10 goals in 8 games
This is a bit reductive given they play in different positions so a key part of sanchos job is also to get assists

Agree on the general point re sancho maybe being overpriced in the summer

My impression was that most people were so irritated by the saga because it was obvious bvb werent goong to sell him for what we were willing to pay and therefore we didnt move on to another target in time to complete a deal before the end of summer. The fact is there are other right wingers out there and its a position we desperately needed strengthening in. In the end we got two youth players who are unlikely to contribute much this season, one of whom couldnt even join in summer because the deal went through late. Compare this with liverpool who went after sarr realised they were asking for too much then bought jota before anyone was even aware that was a possibility

Seems some people on here are trying to credit ed for getting the sancho situation right when really he just made a massive shit show of signing a right winger
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,363
Mata only barely worked at right wing in his prime and he is another player that just wants to cut inside all the time, that might work if our right back was capable of going forward.

I meant a right winger that is capable of getting to the byline as well as cutting inside and who is younger than mata ams therefore able to do a job defensively so they could be trusted in big games. Not exactly sure who i am describing but sure they must exist!
Yeah im not disagreeing. Mata is a bit part option at best. Lets see how Diallo does. Unless they decide to go back for Sancho then I dont see us bringing in just another squad option. We need a big player there
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,635
The problem with the deal was people's egos trumping over business sense. Dortmund called us up early in the window with smug confidence and said "We know you want him, here is how this is going to work". You only do that when you hold all the cards and have no interest in maintaining a mutually respectful relationship for the future.

United, quite rightly, tried to find a solution to the impasse - probably taking into account the player's availability and willingness to join us. But one Dortmund's so called deadline wasn't met per their terms it simply became an exercise in ego flexing. I still believe we would have got him in the end had United caved to their demands even post the deadline but ultimately it is too much of a risk.

There is a reason why we aren't in a similar financial situation to them or Barca despite having no sugar daddy. We have 0 visibility on how future revenues are going to pan out and to fork out a fortune for an upcoming player who has no experience in the PL was to put all your eggs in one basket and to jeopardize the future of the club. This isn't a casino.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Why are we even thinking of buying Sancho when we need to strengthen our defence and our DM?
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
14,007
Location
Sunny Manc
I said this in the summer, but aside from RW really not being the priority, personally I don’t think Sancho is a big enough upgrade to warrant splashing £100m. I don’t think he offers us much different to Rashford, Martial, or Greenwood. Then there’s the fact he’s by no means a guaranteed success, as we all know how those Dortmund players can be. It would’ve been a bad move.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
The problem with the deal was people's egos trumping over business sense. Dortmund called us up early in the window with smug confidence and said "We know you want him, here is how this is going to work". You only do that when you hold all the cards and have no interest in maintaining a mutually respectful relationship for the future.

United, quite rightly, tried to find a solution to the impasse - probably taking into account the player's availability and willingness to join us. But one Dortmund's so called deadline wasn't met per their terms it simply became an exercise in ego flexing. I still believe we would have got him in the end had United caved to their demands even post the deadline but ultimately it is too much of a risk.

There is a reason why we aren't in a similar financial situation to them or Barca despite having no sugar daddy. We have 0 visibility on how future revenues are going to pan out and to fork out a fortune for an upcoming player who has no experience in the PL was to put all your eggs in one basket and to jeopardize the future of the club. This isn't a casino.
Didn't help that someone in the club openly spoke about how we should be looking to take advantage of clubs in the covid window. Then their president goes on record saying there would be no corona discount.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,379
Wolves are struggling to get any kind of consistency out of Traore. He looks like he can deliver so much but then fails to too often. So much potential but no application. He just can’t seem to be effective unless he starts on the bench and comes on as an impact sub.
I half agree. Certainly this season. It might be to do with his contract, but he hasn’t looked as good this season.
That being said, I would still take him at the right price to rotate with greenwood and Diallo.
Whatever you say about his poor goal and assist return, he would be lethal at starting counter attacks and occupying two players on the right hand side for us.
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,193
This is a bit reductive given they play in different positions so a key part of sanchos job is also to get assists

Agree on the general point re sancho maybe being overpriced in the summer

My impression was that most people were so irritated by the saga because it was obvious bvb werent goong to sell him for what we were willing to pay and therefore we didnt move on to another target in time to complete a deal before the end of summer. The fact is there are other right wingers out there and its a position we desperately needed strengthening in. In the end we got two youth players who are unlikely to contribute much this season, one of whom couldnt even join in summer because the deal went through late. Compare this with liverpool who went after sarr realised they were asking for too much then bought jota before anyone was even aware that was a possibility

Seems some people on here are trying to credit ed for getting the sancho situation right when really he just made a massive shit show of signing a right winger
I think people in the club were far too invested in the deal, in particular the manager, the players and us the fans so publicly moving on wasn't an option for the CEO. He would have been slaughtered and would have lost the confidence and trust of his manager so he had to play along like he was trying but he never had the intention nor the authorization from the owners to pay up.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,263
The Sancho of last season would have been worth 100m to us. I hate to break the news, but RW is still a significant weakness in the squad. But no, I wouldn’t go anywhere north if 60m for him now.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,504
Overpriced or not, we've been lacking a good RW for half a decade now. Crazy how lopsided our attacks are and how we still haven't signed one is beyond me. Terribly run club.
I doubt there has ever been a decent club not taking care of one of the positions like this for so long. This is beyond criminal.
 

Cathy Ferguson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
3,962
Why are we even thinking of buying Sancho when we need to strengthen our defence and our DM?
This. If we can sign a top class CB we might actually challenge for the titel, or at least make us much stronger. I do not know who that might be (swap Pogba for Varane) but if Leicester's scouts can identify Fofana ours should not be worse.

I would pay 60m for Sancho but Leon Bailey is in better form. If we can spend 60m in January that should be earmarked for a top class CB.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
This. If we can sign a top class CB we might actually challenge for the titel, or at least make us much stronger. I do not know who that might be (swap Pogba for Varane) but if Leicester's scouts can identify Fofana ours should not be worse.

I would pay 60m for Sancho but Leon Bailey is in better form. If we can spend 60m in January that should be earmarked for a top class CB.
Leicester got a lot of players on the cheap by us getting scammed. We got scammed with Maguire and they got two players for the sale.
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
This is a bit reductive given they play in different positions so a key part of sanchos job is also to get assists

Agree on the general point re sancho maybe being overpriced in the summer

My impression was that most people were so irritated by the saga because it was obvious bvb werent goong to sell him for what we were willing to pay and therefore we didnt move on to another target in time to complete a deal before the end of summer. The fact is there are other right wingers out there and its a position we desperately needed strengthening in. In the end we got two youth players who are unlikely to contribute much this season, one of whom couldnt even join in summer because the deal went through late. Compare this with liverpool who went after sarr realised they were asking for too much then bought jota before anyone was even aware that was a possibility

Seems some people on here are trying to credit ed for getting the sancho situation right when really he just made a massive shit show of signing a right winger
What if the two youngsters we signed were our backup plan.
What if we didn't move on to other targets because we had no other targets

Neither option is unlikely.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,263
This a thread about Sancho but since there’s a fair amount of discussion that a CB is a greater need than a RW, I’d just like to point out that a DM is a greater need than a CB.
 

Red4Life_#7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
1,112
This a thread about Sancho but since there’s a fair amount of discussion that a CB is a greater need than a RW, I’d just like to point out that a DM is a greater need than a CB.
I agree. A fast, dynamic, breaker of play, preferrably tall and good passer. But I still believe McT can fill that role with a bit more experience as he is already quite displined, just need more game time and more range of passing.

A pacy LCB is 2nd on the list for sure.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,715
Location
Singapore
I never felt that we should offer 100 million for just one player. Hopefully Dortmund is willing to accept 60 mil for him and we can bring him in next 2 transfer window. One quality CB and DM, we would be challenging for the title and Champions League.
 

Jibbs

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
2,238
Don't know about any other club, but we will definitely pay 100m plus for him. We paid 80 m for Maguire, keep that in prospective.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,756
I also dont get how people are talking about the right wing being sorted. We still look incredibly unbalanced, greenwood has struggled this season and has also looked a bit of liability defensively. From what i have read about amad and pellistri we will be lucky if they sre ready for first team action this season. I suspect people are being over optimistic about them because we so desperately need someone in the position

In the absence of signing sancho, i would love us to get someone a bit older anx more mature who could be rotated with greenwood
Yeah the right wing is the giant glaring weakness in this side and it needs addressing sooner rather than later. Feck sake we’re still playing Mata there.
 

Terminator

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,928
I doubt there has ever been a decent club not taking care of one of the positions like this for so long. This is beyond criminal.
Unbelievable really. The day we sign a top class RW we will much more balanced and potent in attack/pressing. It will be a night and day difference IMO.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Don't know about any other club, but we will definitely pay 100m plus for him. We paid 80 m for Maguire, keep that in prospective.
Hope not. General consensus is we overpaid. You don't use a mistake as a precedent, unless of course the goal is to continue making mistakes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.