I'm not knowledgeable enough in Israel/Palestine conflict to have a reasonable opinion but calling Desmond Tutu a bigot and accusing him of antisemitism is way over the line. The man was one of the few real humanitarians around and cared deeply for everyones well-being. I'm not saying Israel is at fault but every criticism that hits them can not just be antisemitism, some must have some truth, same goes for the Palestinians.
This quote from the article is so on point:
Separately, Tutu warned that it was not possible to be a neutral bystander.
“Those who turn a blind eye to injustice actually perpetuate injustice. If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor,”
habla ingles?Excellent hasbara. You eyeing a promotion?
Yet all the countries except israel has had sanctions against them…In 2020, the UN General Assembly passed exactly 23 resolutions condemning various countries.
17 of them were directed against Israel
The rest of the world - Syria, Myanmar, North Korea, Iran and so on - must be content with a combined total of six condemnations.
I fear that no UN organisation is objective about the situation.
So about the report. I have already said that an arab party is part of the government right now. That did not apply to Apartheid in South Africa.
Also the report laments that Gaza is basically cut off from Israel and West Bank. Of course that will affect people's lives. As I said, for me Gaza and West Bank are under military rule, of course life won't feel like a trip to Disneyland.
Among other things, the report also rues the loss of land the Palestinians have experienced in the last 70 years. Well, they lost the bloody war. What did they expect?
AI treat the situation like it is happening and it was created out of thin air. Everything that happened is a prologoue of what is happening now.
I hate to say it, but context is everything and it is desperately missing in AI's report.
It’s Hebrew.habla ingles?
Not sure how this is relevant? I'm sure AI and Desmond Tutu are aware of these whataboutisms but still calling a spade a spade.So I guess those in favor of the Israel is an Apartheid state narrative would have to address the fact that there are about 14 Arabs in the Knesset (one of which is apparently a Likud member no less) in a democratic nation that regularly holds elections. This would on the surface but quite different from Apartheid era South Africa where black South Africans couldn't vote until the mid 90s.
What random individuals say based on their own political preferences isn't really a convincing argument imo. If there is truly apartheid in Israel, those promoting that narrative still have all their work ahead of them since there are currently elections in Israel that Arab citizens participate in to the tune of 70% turnout each cycle. They have, and take advantage of, an opportunity to vote for politicians who best reflect their views, which would seem to be a problem for "Israel is apartheid" proponents.Not sure how this is relevant? I'm sure AI and Desmond Tutu are aware of these whataboutisms but still calling a spade a spade.
Coloureds and Asians had representatives in the parliament of Apartheid South Africa, a country which regularly held democratic elections.So I guess those in favor of the Israel is an Apartheid state narrative would have to address the fact that there are about 14 Arabs in the Knesset (one of which is apparently a Likud member no less) in a democratic nation that regularly holds elections. This would on the surface but quite different from Apartheid era South Africa where black South Africans couldn't vote until the mid 90s.
Edit: Exactly what @adexkola said.So I guess those in favor of the Israel is an Apartheid state narrative would have to address the fact that there are about 14 Arabs in the Knesset (one of which is apparently a Likud member no less) in a democratic nation that regularly holds elections. This would on the surface but quite different from Apartheid era South Africa where black South Africans couldn't vote until the mid 90s.
You really shouldn't have had to spell this out, it's mind numbingly obvious.Coloureds and Asians had representatives in the parliament of Apartheid South Africa, a country which regularly held democratic elections.
There were a few black people in the US Congress during Jim Crow/defacto segregation in the North. The US has always been a democratic nation even during years of massive disenfranchisement of black people.
See where I'm going here?
Yeah but we're not talking about random, token candidates. There are 14 or so Arabs in the 120 member Knesset, which is not insignificant. Are you telling Israeli Arabs their votes shouldn't count ?Coloureds and Asians had representatives in the parliament of Apartheid South Africa, a country which regularly held democratic elections.
There were a few black people in the US Congress during Jim Crow/defacto segregation in the North. The US has always been a democratic nation even during years of massive disenfranchisement of black people.
See where I'm going here?
i find that racism is alive and well in europe at a time when its been largely blunted in the states
You're really massaging that statistic. 3 of those Arabs are Druze. 1, possibly 2, of them are Christian (one attended a Catholic high school). Also, Arabs make up over 20% of the Israeli population, but are sitting at 11% of the Knesset... even less than that when you account for the Druze and Arab Christian(s).Yeah but we're not talking about random, token candidates. There are 14 or so Arabs in the 120 member Knesset, which is not insignificant. Are you telling Israeli Arabs their votes shouldn't count ?
This looks like something Israeli Arab voters can change if they so choose. They can obviously vote for whoever they want.You're really massaging that statistic. 3 of those Arabs are Druze. 1, possibly 2, of them are Christian (one attended a Catholic high school). Also, Arabs make up over 20% of the Israeli population, but are sitting at 11% of the Knesset... even less than that when you account for the Druze and Arab Christian(s).
The reason Israel is an Apartheid state is not as much due to it's treatment of Israeli Arabs (and other minorities). You're (deliberately) ignoring the elephant in the room.Yeah but we're not talking about random, token candidates. There are 14 or so Arabs in the 120 member Knesset, which is not insignificant. Are you telling Israeli Arabs their votes shouldn't count ?
You know, coincidentally, the Constitution said black Americans could do just that during the entire Jim Crow Era. But I'm sure voter suppression has been largely blunted in Israel, the same way it was here.This looks like something Israeli Arab voters can change if they so choose. They can obviously vote for whoever they want.
I think that's a big problem for Israel which needs to be looked at in a balanced way by taking into account both Israeli and Palestinian (most recently Hamas) policy towards one another.The reason Israel is an Apartheid state is not as much due to it's treatment of Israeli Arabs (and other minorities). You're (deliberately) ignoring the elephant in the room.
Sorry, why would you distinguish Druze and Christians here?You're really massaging that statistic. 3 of those Arabs are Druze. 1, possibly 2, of them are Christian (one attended a Catholic high school). Also, Arabs make up over 20% of the Israeli population, but are sitting at 11% of the Knesset... even less than that when you account for the Druze and Arab Christian(s).
The accepted definition of Apartheid appears to be broader than relying on the specific conditions that prevailed in South Africa. Amnesty have also recently declared Myanmar an apartheid state, and I believe under the current definition there are more states which can be legitimately categorized as such. Whether this process actually helps drive actual change or has the effect of cheapening the term remains to be seen.So I guess those in favor of the Israel is an Apartheid state narrative would have to address the fact that there are about 14 Arabs in the Knesset (one of which is apparently a Likud member no less) in a democratic nation that regularly holds elections. This would on the surface but quite different from Apartheid era South Africa where black South Africans couldn't vote until the mid 90s.
Yes I'm sure we could pluck an endless amount of whataboutisms out of history, but none would perfectly align with the specific nuances of the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The further people discuss this issue through the lens of fringe narratives, the further apart both sides will drift until diplomacy and negotiations are impossible, which is ultimately the only way progress will be made.You know, coincidentally, the Constitution said black Americans could do just that during the entire Jim Crow Era. But I'm sure voter suppression has been largely blunted in Israel, the same way it was here.
Because Druze and Christians aren't the same thing...?Sorry, why would you distinguish Druze and Christians here?
That's not a whataboutism. It's another example of apartheid. Which, again, is what Israel has done / is doing.Yes I'm sure we could pluck an endless amount of whataboutisms out of history, but none would perfectly align with the specific nuances of the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The further people discuss this issue through the lens of fringe narratives, the further apart both sides will drift until diplomacy and negotiations, which is ultimately the only way progress will be made.
I think the question is why you'd distinguish them from other Arabs?Because Druze and Christians aren't the same thing...?
Because Druze and Christians aren't the same thing...?
This.I think the question is why you'd distinguish them from other Arabs?
I think the question is why you'd distinguish them from other Arabs?
Because they're not Palestinian Muslim Arabs.This.
Yes but the conversation was about Israeli Arabs as a whole.Because they're not Palestinian Muslim Arabs.
They are ethnic Arabs, so would obviously count here.Because they're not Palestinian Muslim Arabs.
Yes but the conversation was about Israeli Arabs as a whole.
The Druze and Arab Christians have a much different relationship with the State of Israel. To include them in the "it isn't apartheid because there are 14 Arabs in the Knesset" seems to me to be ignoring that fact.They are ethnic Arabs, so would obviously count here.
Legally speaking, how is the relationship different?The Druze and Arab Christians have a much different relationship with the State of Israel. To include them in the "it isn't apartheid because there are 14 Arabs in the Knesset" seems to me to be ignoring that fact.
When examining Jewish vs non-Jewish participation in Israeli elections, all ethnic Arabs as well as other minorities count (I thought this would be obvious).The Druze and Arab Christians have a much different relationship with the State of Israel. To include them in the "it isn't apartheid because there are 14 Arabs in the Knesset" seems to me to be ignoring that fact.
Because if they were Muslim, or Palestinian, they’d struggle to have the same rights they do have as Druze or Arab Christian.Legally speaking, how is the relationship different?
Arab Muslim citizens of Israel have the same rights as Arab Christian and Druze citizens.Because if they were Muslim, or Palestinian, they’d struggle to have the same rights they do have as Druze or Arab Christian.
I disagree. There is no balance in apartheid, the onus and attention falls on the side performing apartheid.I think that's a big problem for Israel which needs to be looked at in a balanced way by taking into account both Israeli and Palestinian (most recently Hamas) policy towards one another.