Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,521
Now, they definitely would not have gained full sovereignty, but it would have been a giant step towards it.
Once they put pen on the paper it's done, well done for Arafat not signing the shitty deal, living legally under the Israeli control for eternity.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,681
Location
The Zone
Netanyahu refuses to be dictated to by a foreign leader and launches a massive military assault on Haifa. Declares Hamas made him do it.
:lol:

Really does feel like we are in a Doctor Strangelove situation. In about a decade we will find out just how insane the conversations between Netanyahu and Biden were.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,322
12 voted in favor of the latest UNSC vote for making Palestine a full UN member.

2 abstained and one voted against.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,681
"accept a commitment" :lol:
again, like a lot of this, would be funny if it wasn't in service of an ongoing genocide.
...

i genuinely believe we will have a scientifically interesting generation of psychopaths from gaza - the ones who are about 5-10 years old now and have lost some/most family. some have recently had israeli drones playing the sounds of children crying at them so that they come out and get shot. i guess their trust in others, value for their own life, etc will be fundamentally broken. there are also the effects of extended malnourishment on brain development.
if they get the chance to unleash genuine hell on israel, it would be deserved.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,965
"accept a commitment" :lol:
again, like a lot of this, would be funny if it wasn't in service of an ongoing genocide.
...

i genuinely believe we will have a scientifically interesting generation of psychopaths from gaza - the ones who are about 5-10 years old now and have lost some/most family. some have recently had israeli drones playing the sounds of children crying at them so that they come out and get shot. i guess their trust in others, value for their own life, etc will be fundamentally broken. there are also the effects of extended malnourishment on brain development.
if they get the chance to unleash genuine hell on israel, it would be deserved.
Can you elaborate on the bolded? Would you like to see more bloodshed?
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,681
Can you elaborate on the bolded? Would you like to see more bloodshed?
what i want is irrelevant
if these kids grow up and get the chance to strike it will be hellish. and to a great extent, a result of this war on them (which is where the "deserved" comes from).
at this point, i think the rational thing for israel to do is to kill and displace and starve more so that this cannot happen.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
And immediately after that, Russia and China vetoed the US resolution for an immediate ceasefire and return of the hostages.

UN is the most useless thing ever.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,225
Location
Voted the best city in the world
And immediately after that, Russia and China vetoed the US resolution for an immediate ceasefire and return of the hostages.

UN is the most useless thing ever.
Yep, agreed. You’d think in any other situation (democracy and the link) a vote of 12/15 would comfortably carry any motion/resolution but here we literally have 1 vote which vetoes it. What’s the point if it’s that compromised to the whims of 1/minority?
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
Yep, agreed. You’d think in any other situation (democracy and the link) a vote of 12/15 would comfortably carry any motion/resolution but here we literally have 1 vote which vetoes it. What’s the point if it’s that compromised to the whims of 1/minority?
As it has always been: to protect the interests of superpowers (the US, USSR/Russia, and China).

France and UK have unilaterally (albeit informally) decided to not use veto power (the last time they used it was in 1989).
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,307
As it has always been: to protect the interests of superpowers (the US, USSR/Russia, and China).

France and UK have unilaterally (albeit informally) decided to not use veto power (the last time they used it was in 1989).
Interesting, didn't know this, thanks!
 

Traub

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
10,239
Yep, agreed. You’d think in any other situation (democracy and the link) a vote of 12/15 would comfortably carry any motion/resolution but here we literally have 1 vote which vetoes it. What’s the point if it’s that compromised to the whims of 1/minority?
Have you seen some of the members of the security council? The dictionaries in their countries probably don't even have the word democracy in them.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,225
Location
Voted the best city in the world
As it has always been: to protect the interests of superpowers (the US, USSR/Russia, and China).

France and UK have unilaterally (albeit informally) decided to not use veto power (the last time they used it was in 1989).
Yeah, pointless organisation.
Have you seen some of the members of the security council? The dictionaries in their countries probably don't even have the word democracy in them.
Yeah I know but my point was more around how voting on matters should (or does) usually work for majority, versus having only a select few with absolute veto powers etc. which makes it completely pointless.
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,521
And immediately after that, Russia and China vetoed the US resolution for an immediate ceasefire and return of the hostages.

UN is the most useless thing ever.
You know very well why they vetoed, but disingenuously you chose to not say why. It was not a ceasefire resolution, it was green light for Israel to invade Rafah.

"Algeria’s Ambassador Amar Bendjama
Emphasizing “measures” to reduce civilian harm and talk of “operations” implies a license for continuing bloodshed for Israel. The operation in Rafah would have devastating consequences if it goes ahead, he added"
 

That_Bloke

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
2,879
Location
Cologne
Supports
Leicester City
The hilarious, self inflicted humiliation of Germany continues...
Germany went and still goes farther than any country in the world, breaking conferences, even arresting and banning from the country people showing support to Palestine. Yet:

- Baerbock: "Hang on a minute, you're going too far."
- Netanyahu: "nAZi !!!!"

This bitch slap in the face the moment Germany tries to deviate from absolute and unquestioned support is incredible.
 
Last edited:

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,225
Location
Voted the best city in the world
You know very well why they vetoed, but disingenuously you chose to not say why. It was not a ceasefire resolution, it was green light for Israel to invade Rafah.

"Algeria’s Ambassador Amar Bendjama
Emphasizing “measures” to reduce civilian harm and talk of “operations” implies a license for continuing bloodshed for Israel. The operation in Rafah would have devastating consequences if it goes ahead, he added"
If that poster deliberately & knowingly twists narratives in that manner, then that is despicable.
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,521
If that poster deliberately & knowingly twists narratives in that manner, then that is despicable.
Just think about it, why would Algeria oppose a ceasefire resolution and vote against it?

They have been advocating for a ceasefire for 6 months.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
You know very well why they vetoed, but disingenuously you chose to not say why. It was not a ceasefire resolution, it was green light for Israel to invade Rafah.

"Algeria’s Ambassador Amar Bendjama

Emphasizing “measures” to reduce civilian harm and talk of “operations” implies a license for continuing bloodshed for Israel. The operation in Rafah would have devastating consequences if it goes ahead, he added"
Where does it say so? https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147856
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
Just think about it, why would Algeria oppose a ceasefire resolution and vote against it?

They have been advocating for a ceasefire for 6 months.
My best guess is because the US resolution was weaker than the one the US had just vetoed. While for China and Russia, they vetoed it cause the US has been vetoing their resolutions, so it is a bit of tit for tat. It is in their best interest for US to continue losing face.
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,521
Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said the US had promised an agreement to end the fighting time and time again.

Now, the US has finally recognized the need for a ceasefire, when more than 30,000 Gazans have already died.

He said the US was trying to "sell a product" to the Council by using the word imperative in its resolution.

"This is not enough" and the Council must "demand a ceasefire", he declared.

He said there was no call for a ceasefire in the text, accusing US leadership of "deliberately misleading the international community." The draft is just playing to US voters, he said, "to throw them a bone" with a false ceasefire call
 

langster

Captain Stink mouth, so soppy few pints very wow!
Scout
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
21,587
Location
My brain can't get pregnant!
Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said the US had promised an agreement to end the fighting time and time again.

Now, the US has finally recognized the need for a ceasefire, when more than 30,000 Gazans have already died.

He said the US was trying to "sell a product" to the Council by using the word imperative in its resolution.

"This is not enough" and the Council must "demand a ceasefire", he declared.

He said there was no call for a ceasefire in the text, accusing US leadership of "deliberately misleading the international community." The draft is just playing to US voters, he said, "to throw them a bone" with a false ceasefire call

It's quite staggering how the US, UK and Germany are getting absolutely fecking whipped on the world stage. Good on other countries for showing them up and calling them out. It's just a shame nobody will notice.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
It's literally their in the link you provided.
Maybe I cannot ready having barely slept yesterday, but where does it say so in the resolution?


  • Makes imperative an immediate and sustained ceasefire with an “urgent need to expand the flow of humanitarian assistance” to all civilians and lifting “all barriers” to delivering aid at scale to Gazans
  • Israel and all armed groups must comply with their obligations under international law, providing protection for humanitarian workers and medical personnel
  • Condemns all acts of terrorism including the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October, the taking and killing of hostages, murder of civilians, sexual violence and condemns the use of civilian buildings for military purposes
  • Rejects any forced displacement of civilians in Gaza
  • Demands that Hamas and other armed groups immediately grant humanitarian access to all remaining hostages
  • Underscores the Council’s full support for the UN Senior Humanitarian and Reconstruction Coordinator Sigrid Kaag, the Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator, so they can establish the new UN aid mechanism under previous resolution 2720
  • Stressed the importance of the Senior Coordinator leading efforts for the recovery and reconstruction of Gaza
  • Demands all parties respect humanitarian notification and deconfliction mechanisms in place to prevent civilian deaths
  • Rejects any action by Israel that could “reduce the territory of Gaza” and condemns calls from some Israeli ministers for the resettlement of Gaza or demographic changes
  • Reaffirms condemnation of the ongoing attacks by Houthi rebels in Yemen on shipping in the Red Sea
  • Reiterates the Security Council’s “unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-State solution”