That's because its a double negative . As an English journalist you would think he knows how to properly construct a sentence, yet here we are.Strangely worded sentence that.
That's because its a double negative . As an English journalist you would think he knows how to properly construct a sentence, yet here we are.Strangely worded sentence that.
It's a slight twist on a commonly used phrase 'I've heard nothing to the contrary', surely.That's because its a double negative . As an English journalist you would think he knows how to properly construct a sentence, yet here we are.
What's a pre-desert? Isn't that just a field or a forest?people seem so caught up on whether or not sancho is worth 80m that they have forgotten what impact this kind of outlay might have on our owners. imagine if they had to go with pre-desert for a whole year just to finance this deal. what happens if they have to get a smaller helicopter to the grouse shoot? it doesn’t bear thinking about.
He’s just trying to avoid mentioning the elephant in the room.So he has heard Nothing ?Journalism seems easy .
Only the old know and love Barry.Oh Sancho
Well you came
to the Euros without playing
But our stance didn't change
Oh Sancho
When you sign
Well you'll stop us from sucking
And we need you today
Oh Sancho
It's perfectly fine, not an uncommon turn of phrase at all - even in professional writing and/or journalism.That's because its a double negative . As an English journalist you would think he knows how to properly construct a sentence, yet here we are.
I sang that to the tune...Oh Sancho
Well you came
to the Euros without playing
But our stance didn't change
Oh Sancho
When you sign
Well you'll stop us from sucking
And we need you today
Oh Sancho
He'll be a great player for you.It seems like this is a done deal. I expect an announcement a day or two after the Euros is over for England.
City get an extra £11-12m depending on final fee.He'll be a great player for you.
Not happy he's on his way to you.
Exactly this. Sancho’s a really down to earth guy with strong ethical values. He’s alluded to before the importance to him of playing for a club with history and not one that’s just trying to buy everything like a City or a Chelsea or a Liverpool. He’s got a good head on his shoulders.Pretty much also Sancho seems only to want United.
How do you know his ethical values?Exactly this. Sancho’s a really down to earth guy with strong ethical values. He’s alluded to before the importance to him of playing for a club with history and not one that’s just trying to buy everything like a City or a Chelsea or a Liverpool. He’s got a good head on his shoulders.
Exactly this. Sancho’s a really down to earth guy with strong ethical values. He’s alluded to before the importance to him of playing for a club with history and not one that’s just trying to buy everything like a City or a Chelsea or a Liverpool. He’s got a good head on his shoulders.
Huge days ahead!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Don't even think about coming to their defense.
Haha trust me I don’t want to, but that statement seemed a bit bizarre to meDon't even think about coming to their defense.
Big daylio todalio
Is that good or bad though as ya know we've had him for a season less than we could of. Is not having him last season worth the saving?Looks like waiting a year has saved the club €30m.
Add one what?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Maybe if we'd paid the extra 30m we'd have another European trophy in the cabinet now which is well worth it. Penny pinching never helps if the player is good enough to impact you like Sancho will beIs that good or bad though as ya know we've had him for a season less than we could of. Is not having him last season worth the saving?
Varane; sometime next year I thinkOk.. this is done.. moving on.. who's next?
If we lost out on the CL last year we could've made the argument (CL brings in ~50M Eur or something like that). Maybe we would've won the EL with him but they'll probably see it as reasonable savings.Is that good or bad though as ya know we've had him for a season less than we could of. Is not having him last season worth the saving?
Maybe if we'd just been less.....well shit, in the final, we'd have a European trophyMaybe if we'd paid the extra 30m we'd have another European trophy in the cabinet now which is well worth it. Penny pinching never helps if the player is good enough to impact you like Sancho will be
ah yeah look chances are Sancho isn't the difference maker in that tumescent 120 mins. Actually Maguire's presence would've been biggerMaybe if we'd just been less.....well shit, in the final, we'd have a European trophy
Julian Laurens had a bit of an issue with the media building us up after beating PSG 3-1 in Paris. He was on radio saying that we actually didn't play well but PSG made mistakes which flattered us.Tweet aside, was this the bloke that had some sort of issue with United last year? I can’t really remember what it was but he went on a radio show and had massive rant about something which was United related
He's a big PSG fan, so whenever United tend to overcome PSG, he tends to attack United. Plus, he works for ESPN, so he tends to be more of a sensationalist as a result.Tweet aside, was this the bloke that had some sort of issue with United last year? I can’t really remember what it was but he went on a radio show and had a massive rant about something which was United related