stefan92
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 7,795
- Supports
- Hannover 96
True, it was barely a comment, but it has become very clear that that was based on EtH rating Sancho's performance (and that of other players) different than Sancho did. Apologizing would therefore mean accepting a judgement that Sancho believes is false. He could be wrong about this, but I fully get why he doesn't want to do that. And because United keeps underperforming under EtH after most matchdays Sancho currently can feel right about this.I honestly can't believe people are deluded enough to be supporting Sancho here. That's absolutely bonkers. ETH barely commented about him and he threw his toys out of the pram. He has been told to apologize and is so pig headed he hasn't done so in three months.
EtH apparently still expecting an apology for me is just bad management . I don't think I have ever seen such an issue escalate this way, instead I am aware of examples where managers just acknowledge that there players have a different opinion on their own performance or even go so far as stating something like "I want my players to argue with me, it shows they want to play"