#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,362
What's up with it? Maybe he should get a fade, just to be different.James really needs to replace his barber to have a cut that suits him. I really can't take him serious with it.
Agreed. The Henry V look doesn't really work on James.
Do you think there are things then, that managers and coaches see in a player, that you don’t? Do you think Garner would be a starter for Brazil for example?Garner and Fred play different positions. Our problem is that Garner is a sitting or defensive midfielder who is comfortable in a 2 man midfield, whereas Fred is neither defensive nor comfortable. Garner would not be brought back to replace Fred but to perform the role Fred and McTominay share between them (and neither of them do it well). Overall footballing abilities, though, I've seen Garner do more than Fred ever has.
100%Do you think there are things then, that managers and coaches see in a player, that you don’t? Do you think Garner would be a starter for Brazil for example?
Not trying to be confrontational- it’s just so ridiculously common for a fan on a message board say X (youth team player) is better than Y (established but unpopular first teamer). And yet it so rarely happens that X successfully replaces Y.
I’ve only seen Garner play in the FA cup matches (he’s seemed excellent in both) so I’m not trying to denigrate him. Maybe it’s the strength, positional or tactical aspects which football fans are less good at noticing but managers do?
Hi. I appreciate the spirit of your comment. To answer, I don't watch Brazil. I saw them play for the first time in years when I saw them in Russia 2018. Their whole team moves and breathes as one, which is not what we see in Premier League teams (City maybe aside). That said, Garner and Fred play different positions in different systems. I think if you compare Garner to other holding midfielders, he looks good, and if you compare Fred to other offense-minded midfielders, he comes up short. I see Fred make mistakes, sloppy passes, missing tackles, getting brushed off easily, and shooting wildly. I don't see Garner making silly mistakes like that, so in my view, he's a better player.Do you think there are things then, that managers and coaches see in a player, that you don’t? Do you think Garner would be a starter for Brazil for example?
Not trying to be confrontational- it’s just so ridiculously common for a fan on a message board say X (youth team player) is better than Y (established but unpopular first teamer). And yet it so rarely happens that X successfully replaces Y.
I’ve only seen Garner play in the FA cup matches (he’s seemed excellent in both) so I’m not trying to denigrate him. Maybe it’s the strength, positional or tactical aspects which football fans are less good at noticing but managers do?
I think that’s an entirely fair assessment! It will be interesting to see what happens to Garner next season. It wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up somewhere like a newly promoted Bournemouth or Fulham on loan for the season. Or would you prefer to keep him at Utd but potentially playing a fair bit less?Hi. I appreciate the spirit of your comment. To answer, I don't watch Brazil. I saw them play for the first time in years when I saw them in Russia 2018. Their whole team moves and breathes as one, which is not what we see in Premier League teams (City maybe aside). That said, Garner and Fred play different positions in different systems. I think if you compare Garner to other holding midfielders, he looks good, and if you compare Fred to other offense-minded midfielders, he comes up short. I see Fred make mistakes, sloppy passes, missing tackles, getting brushed off easily, and shooting wildly. I don't see Garner making silly mistakes like that, so in my view, he's a better player.
I think we needed Garner here this season, and I hope we sign a new midfield in the summer that is vastly superior to Garner. I would still love to have him in the first team, even if not starting, but you're right that if he went to a newly promoted Premier League side he would get the battle-hardening he needs to really kick on at this level.I think that’s an entirely fair assessment! It will be interesting to see what happens to Garner next season. It wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up somewhere like a newly promoted Bournemouth or Fulham on loan for the season. Or would you prefer to keep him at Utd but potentially playing a fair bit less?
What a load of utter waffle this is.
So true.Do you think there are things then, that managers and coaches see in a player, that you don’t? Do you think Garner would be a starter for Brazil for example?
Not trying to be confrontational- it’s just so ridiculously common for a fan on a message board say X (youth team player) is better than Y (established but unpopular first teamer). And yet it so rarely happens that X successfully replaces Y.
I’ve only seen Garner play in the FA cup matches (he’s seemed excellent in both) so I’m not trying to denigrate him. Maybe it’s the strength, positional or tactical aspects which football fans are less good at noticing but managers do?
Mediocre, a he mostly is as a number 10.How did he play ?
I think Fred is one of the worst midfield signings we have made, especially considering the fee.....but I totally agree with your comment. Garner doing well for Forest by no means shows he can come into a much more pressurised envronment for us and peform better eve than Fred who I far from fond of player wise.Do you think there are things then, that managers and coaches see in a player, that you don’t? Do you think Garner would be a starter for Brazil for example?
Not trying to be confrontational- it’s just so ridiculously common for a fan on a message board say X (youth team player) is better than Y (established but unpopular first teamer). And yet it so rarely happens that X successfully replaces Y.
I’ve only seen Garner play in the FA cup matches (he’s seemed excellent in both) so I’m not trying to denigrate him. Maybe it’s the strength, positional or tactical aspects which football fans are less good at noticing but managers do?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think it's important we start getting it right with these young lads, give him a season to see what he can do, if he's showing real promise then keep him and if he's looking a bit below what we're looking for then sell with a buyback.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Don't agree about the Fred statement, I think he has had some excellent games for us. He is often played as a more defensive minded midfielder rather than a more forward thinking player, to which he is more adept, although I do think he has had some very poor games also, to me he is a decent midfielder, but to challenge for trophies then he would need to be upgraded, but still a good player coming of the bench to give us some momentum.I think Fred is one of the worst midfield signings we have made, especially considering the fee.....but I totally agree with your comment. Garner doing well for Forest by no means shows he can come into a much more pressurised envronment for us and peform better eve than Fred who I far from fond of player wise.
With the possibility of Pogba, Pereira, Lingard, VDB, Matic maybe all leaving we could literally be down to McFred net season minus transfers so I hope that maybe Garner is ready for a squad role and maybe added to a prudent free signing like Kamara leaving us to make a big deal still in cm
He can replace Scott as wellWe would be a better side if Garner replaced Fred ....offensively and defensively.
Fred and Mctom are 8s, Matic will be gone, we need to buy 2 midfieldersMakes sense. Hannibal on loan to get a full season of adult football.
Starters: #6-Fred
Backups: McTominay/Matic/Garner
Unless we sign 2 CMs like we should and just move on from Matic.
Yes but not even highlighting Fred you hit the nail on the head for me "A good player coming off the bench" a squad role basically. For me, we have a squad of 35players and in terms of good "starters" we barely have a 5 a side team in my opinion. We have far too many squad players starting regularly Lindelof, Fred, McTominay being three obvious ones but there are plenty more. We need to trim the squad numbers wise, lower the number of squad options to quality first team options. We need a squad of 15 top players and 10 squad options including yougnsters, off the top of my head I would say currently its more like 5/6 top players 15-18 squad options including youngsters and at least 9 lots of deadwood for various reasons that is near unforgivable considering the ivestsment we have madeDon't agree about the Fred statement, I think he has had some excellent games for us. He is often played as a more defensive minded midfielder rather than a more forward thinking player, to which he is more adept, although I do think he has had some very poor games also, to me he is a decent midfielder, but to challenge for trophies then he would need to be upgraded, but still a good player coming of the bench to give us some momentum.
Now, about Garner, I agree with you that he looks ready for a squad role, but to come straight in and dominate games, I'm not sure he's quite there yet. I feel that Garner is one of those players who will gradually improve throughout his career, so say in three seasons time he could be an outstanding type of DM, meanwhile you are correct in the fact that we will need another midfielder, or two, to give us some dominance in that area, which we don't have at the moment.
I would love to see Hannibal given some minutes, and to me he should replace Mata on the bench.
Think that's what he meant. We'd get a 6 and bring back Garner to act as a 'new midfielder'. The 6 would be partnered with Fred as our starters and then Matic, Mctominay and Garner as backupsFred and Mctom are 8s, Matic will be gone, we need to buy 2 midfielders
Tchouameni can play in tandem with Garner and we can see which one adapts best to thre Premier LeagueHe'd make sense as Tchouameni's back-up next season as we need 2 DM's.
We need a quality starting #8 to play with Tchouameni, Garner has never played above 2nd tier football, a season as a back-up is where he needs to begin his potential PL career.Tchouameni can play in tandem with Garner and we can see which one adapts best to thre Premier League
If we had a proper DM and Pogba stayed then I would assume the starting 8s would be Bruno and Pogba. McT, Fred, Garner filling in for those players wouldn't be bad options. Problem is, like people have been saying we probably have too many numbers and not enough quality. DvB, Matic might stay and then we'd have 8 CMs plus maybe Hannibal too for 3 spots. Too many players but not enough competition.We need a quality starting #8 to play with Tchouameni, Garner has never played above 2nd tier football, a season as a back-up is where he needs to begin his potential PL career.
I was thinking the same for Tchouameni as back upWe need a quality starting #8 to play with Tchouameni, Garner has never played above 2nd tier football, a season as a back-up is where he needs to begin his potential PL career.
As back-up for who? He's one of the best DM's in Europe, he's played CL football and is a starter for the French national team.I was thinking the same for Tchouameni as back up
Plenty of players have played CL football and Fred starts for Brazil????As back-up for who? He's one of the best DM's in Europe, he's played CL football and is a starter for the French national team.