Again, why does his salary matter in all this? Should you get a lesser punishment because you earn less?This guy is paid £1m a year by Sky. Let that sink in. £1m. If he can’t behave himself in public he deserves nothing less than the sack.
Again, why does his salary matter in all this? Should you get a lesser punishment because you earn less?This guy is paid £1m a year by Sky. Let that sink in. £1m. If he can’t behave himself in public he deserves nothing less than the sack.
Sky definitely have ground to sack him and would have done that already if he isn't their best pundit and such valuable asset. They will probably try to see if things will calm down and keep him for those reasons imo. Not judging if that's right or wrong, but that's how I see it.Amazed he wasn't sacked, no excuse for that reaction imo, especially as he can clearly see there is a young girl in the car.
Aye, that, along with Sky fully condemn such behaviour, was the purpose of the Interview.Maybe I'm soft but I felt sorry for Carragher watching him being grilled in that Interview
Kind of like Jerry Springer but he tends to shout at the dysfunctional people he has on his showWhat is Jeremy Kyle?
Fair enough that's your personal opinion, I'm sure there's a lot of Liverpool and neutral fans that enjoy tuning in to see what he has to say.Eh...I'm not sure if that's the case. He's an excellent pundit, but I've never tuned into a matchday specifically to see him and I doubt many people do. If there's a match that's on I want to see I'm not going to be deterred from watching it specifically because it's Jamie Redknapp and Souness on instead of Carragher, and similarly if there's a match on I'm not arsed about I'm not going to go out my way to watch it for his analysis. Especially when Sky could probably get him a pundit who's equally as good if they wish to. I'm not completely sure they'll sack him but they could easily afford to.
That's one United fan, I'm sure there's plenty that enjoy his analysis and tune in to MNF specially to see what he has to say.One United fan rang Talksport this morning and said all United fans would cancel their Skysports subscription if he wasn't sacked. Other United fans who rang in said he did a bad thing, but were more angry with the dad and the goading celebrity thing and selling it to newspapers.
I'm sure they do, but I very much doubt anyone will deliberately stop watching because he's no longer on. Most people ultimately tune in to watch the football; if Sky Sports is the only place you can access a United-City game then no one's going to stop watching because Jamie Carragher isn't on.Fair enough that's your personal opinion, I'm sure there's a lot of Liverpool and neutral fans that enjoy tuning in to see what he has to say.
I was as well. I was shocked that he would do something like this but he seems to have a history and hasn't learned for his previous altercations.That’s fair enough. Up until today, myself included many people were unaware of this kind of history.
The salary he earns is the price of fame. I’ve no doubt Sky’s lawyers have brand reputation built into his contract. He’s sullied their brand he’ll be sacked. And you’re right, you shouldn’t get a lesser punishment because you earn less. I bet if you check most big corporates terms of employment even the entry level pay grades are likely to be sacked if they damage the corporate brand. Carragher has no comeback IMO.Again, why does his salary matter in all this? Should you get a lesser punishment because you earn less?
I wouldn't put it past Liverpool fans, starting a boycott as one of their own got the boot.I'm sure they do, but I very much doubt anyone will deliberately stop watching because he's no longer on. Most people ultimately tune in to watch the football; if Sky Sports is the only place you can access a United-City game then no one's going to stop watching because Jamie Carragher isn't on.
Whats the level headed unbiased take on this on RAWK
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That is a good point as it shows the general public that you are able to get help if you have issues. Would be a good thing if that were to happen IMO.I was as well. I was shocked that he would do something like this but he seems to have a history and hasn't learned for his previous altercations.
I think that he needs to acknowledge he has a problem and get counselling for it. If he did this then I wouldn't want him sacked because people going through counselling need the support a big organisation can offer. That's the only situation that he should avoid the sack though IMHO.
But he’s the public face of sky sports so doesn’t matter if his car is branded or notBut that's with them doing it on the job with company property, vehicle, uniform... being displayed. Carragher is off job.
I doubt that'll happen, we've seen Liverpool fans saying they thought it was outrageous in this thread and I imagine most will recognise it was a scummy thing to do.I wouldn't put it past Liverpool fans, starting a boycott as one of their own got the boot.
Now let's not exaggerate things - the driver only told him 2-1 / 2-1 that's all.I'd hope the driver Is found, and banned from driving for a very very long time.
Carragher has said he did now know there was a child in the car, he was reacting to the constant abuse being hurled at him. Is that wrong? Yes. Is it a sackable offence? No (but it may be as the media circus will deem it so)
What a day in age we live in for Carra is being hounded out for reacting to a person who uses his mobile phone to film while driving with his child in the car. The persons aim was to hurl as much abuse as carra until he reacted. The idiocy from this person is beyond comprehension for me.
Hadn’t he been goading him a few times before he started filmingNow let's not exaggerate things - the driver only told him 2-1 / 2-1 that's all.
We don't know that. I know Carragher said that but it doesn't mean it's true.Hadn’t he been goading him a few times before he started filming
The idea the he flobbed on him just because of "2-1, 2-1" is so ridiculous, I can't wrap my head around it. There has to be more to it. Maybe i'm giving him too much credit.We don't know that. I know Carragher said that but it doesn't mean it's true.
if you watch the video in page one it's 2-1 / 2-1.Hadn’t he been goading him a few times before he started filming
Well, that's not at all why they were sacked.If Sky don't sack him then it is double standards and a whole lot more. Keys and Gray were sacked for having a bit of harmless light hearted banter between to mates which millions of people have. Carragher spat at a 14 year old girl, something that no right minded person would do and is actual a criminal offence.
2 more cases of road rage before this and he doesn't seem to be learning his lesson from his 2 previous cautions. I give him no credit at the moment.The idea the he flobbed on him just because of "2-1, 2-1" is so ridiculous, I can't wrap my head around it. There has to be more to it. Maybe i'm giving him too much credit.
Carra claims that the guy approached and harassed him 3 times leading up to "spitgate" and he finally lost it on the 4th occasion. Believe whatever you like I guess.The idea the he flobbed on him just because of "2-1, 2-1" is so ridiculous, I can't wrap my head around it. There has to be more to it. Maybe i'm giving him too much credit.
They've cut MNF short tonight because of all thisMNF not started yet?
Sky wanted rid of the former two and milked any excuse they could find. Their offending comments were published months after they had been exchanged when Sky deemed them disposable.If Sky don't sack him then it is double standards and a whole lot more. Keys and Gray were sacked for having a bit of harmless light hearted banter between to mates which millions of people have. Carragher spat at a 14 year old girl, something that no right minded person would do and is actual a criminal offence.
I was looking forward to analysis of our game. Hopefully Neville still does it after the the match tonight.They've cut MNF short tonight because of all this
The daughter saying "stop it dad" before he started with the "2-1" kinda makes me think he'd already been at it.Carra claims that the guy approached and harassed him 3 times leading up to "spitgate" and he finally lost it on the 4th occasion. Believe whatever you like I guess.