This. We pay "Utd tax" on every single deal we make because we're one of the richest clubs in the world. My only thinking is that Newcastle want to avoid being in a similar situation paying 20% extra on every deal so want to set a president early on that they won't be taken the piss out of. I'm confident they will cave, similarly with Diego Carlos and Sevilla who they're trying to low ball as well, cave they shall...
Yeah providing they don’t just move on to another target.
That's the great thing of having a local core with the right United DNA. They understand what playing with United is all about
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ma...n-united-transfers-jesse-lingard-21597631.amp
Made zero sense for us to not let VDB go too and also not to let Jones and Bailly leave for free. But it happened…..
Why? We play neither
Hilarious article. If I saw Wiley I’d also probably chat to him and get a photo op or whatever completely forgetting his antisemitism.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Financial side is woodward and his replacement from 1st feb. Murtough and fletcher dont have a say on stuff like fees. They can make their recommendations but its up to woody.
Exactly, this club is so badly run when it comes to out going transfers.
Well then this doesn't surprise me in the least, Woodward the gift that keeps giving.
Murtough doesn't decide the sale price, does he?
Ahhhhh someone call him a wahhhmbulance. I feel disrespected at having to watch the abject shit this clown has served up for the last two years.
@dinostar77 cleared it up, Woodward is still behind this nonsense.
Woodward is leaving in a few days. I would imagine this is Judge making the shots here
incorrect. if you are in the public eye items in your interest to vet everyone you need. you are duty bound to ask them “are you a racist or similar?” that way you cover yourself. rashy is normally pretty switched on with stuff like that. he even posed it to the queen whilst he was getting his mbe. must have forgotten here whilst being led astray by lingard.
Why not? There are several United players there. The ones not on international duty were given a week off
Our very own Laurel and Hardy
It's not a matter of what he wants, it's a question of how much is keeping him here till the summer worth.
The papers just saw an opportunity to kick a black man. If they cared about anti semitism they'd not be calling for us to go to war with Ukraine, a country where the ruling govt includes a militant neo nazi organisation.
We don't know if they're willing to pay that though, all we know is they're not willing to pay what we want. That number is unknown to us at the moment.
That's what is heavily reported from reliable journalists. Even if we don't wish to believe the media, there isn't a fee that wouldn't be acceptable is there?
You mean the legendary British rapper?
There's never been such a thing.
Is it worth it to hold on to a non-motivated player at a high salary just to use him sparingly off the bench? It’s not, just use a hungry youngster whenever you thought about using Lingard
This makes no sense. Lingard will leave on a free in the summer. We may or may not get a loan fee, but it is a huge risk for the sake of a few million quid. We would already save some money if a club pays his full wages on a loan and that should be seen as a reasonable outcome. What the club are doing is greedy and is exactly the reason why we struggled to offload players such as Rojo and Pereira, whilst also allowing players to run down their contract. If anything, it shows the club has not really changed or learned, contrary to what you think.
