But was Pogba really "shoehorned" into a DM position v Newcastle? It didn't look like a rigid 4-2-3-1 to me. Lingard was playing with a lot less freedom than he has been recently, and deeper. Almost like an additional midfielder. And Pogba put it less effort than ever.
Yup - clear as day it was a 4-3-3, but it doesn't suit the narrative of "Pogba is being played out of position" so people will ignore it. Time to admit he just had an appallingly poor game - a second one after the Spurs one where he was just out of the game completely.
Then Owen's point is even poorer. Why would attack oriented player will master basics of holding midfield play? Did anyone ever say that about Kante? That he never mastered basics of midfielders citing his lack of attacking passes and play?
Sorry. Can't agree here - at all. Which midfield player (midfield, not striker) can you show me who achieved greatness without having positional discipline when without the ball?
No player that I can think of has been considered a midfield great without having even the most basic defensive skills. Pogba routinely mucks up even when defending set-pieces. Lukaku has got grief for this, but Pogba has been equally regularly terrible even in this most basic task. Even fecking Ronaldo doesn't make a fuss about defending from corners and doesn't feck it up. Pogba does
not score enough and has not shown that he
can score enough. Even in his "preferred" formation, playing for a team absolutely dominating the league and hammering one poor opponent after another (I'm talking about Juve), Pogba didn't score anywhere near enough goals to think he's going to be the second coming when it comes to goals scored or assisted. In that light, you can't completely absolve him of defensive duties. At Juve, it was also different in that their opponents almost never had the firepower to threaten. The PL isn't like that and if he thinks he can just play in attack and forget about the defensive duties, he's not mature enough for a team aspiring the level we are aspiring for.
Scholes had defensive duties too. Read on him and you realize that a lot of the "Scholes tackles" were actually very deliberate. He cultivated that image (good on him) of ineptitude in tackling so he got away with it, but a lot of those were very intentional. He did muck in when we defended. Same holds for any other class midfielder. Those that don't (look at Ozil) are blasted despite having far better attacking output than Pogba.
Feel that the anti-Mourinho sentiment in a lot of folks actually gives Pogba a far easier ride than he'd be getting for this mentality if say, Ancelotti or someone similar was in charge who did not carry the baggage that Mourinho does.
And how many league titles did Gerrard win, how many tournaments did England win with Gerrard in the team?
He was an individually talented guy, who could do great things, but how many times did you see him play the 'hollywood ball' instead of keeping it simple for the team?
And Gerrard was far better than Pogba in 'finishing'. Lampard was incomparably better at 'finishing' than Pogba.
If United withdrew an attacker and played Pogba as purely an attacking midfielder, to draw comparisons with other teams, to justify that move, he would have to play that position better than Eriksen and De Bruyne. Quite frankly he couldn't, he doesn't have the brain or particular skill set to do it.
Hargreaves and Owen both alluded to the problem, he is good at all the tasks of a midfielder. The problem is, he is not great at any of them. Add to that his childish petulance and lack of bravery when things get tough and you have a misfit.
Best to admit the situation, and sell on to some rich sucker like Madrid , and use the money to get two really good midfielders who know their job, and let the attackers do theirs'.
Spot on. Nailed it completely. Am just surprised more people don't see this.