Cassady
Supports Liverpool, Not Accrington Stanley
believing McKenzie is one of the biggest bellends of all time.
![LOL :lol: :lol:](/img/smilies/lol.gif)
Thanks for making me giggle !
JFT 96 .
believing McKenzie is one of the biggest bellends of all time.
Sums it up perfectly.It definitely wasn't racist but still a horrible piece and very poorly timed
It must take some arsehole to write something like that
No, i don't think they're that clever. McKenzie is just an oxygen thief, given his behaviour over Hillsborough you could almost say any article regarding the city of Liverpool is almost contrived and designed to cause offence.Wonder if The Sun got wind of Everton considering a ban, and reacted with the Barkley piece?
This is a strong move from Everton, hopefully this spells the end for Kelvin MacKenzie and he can toddle off to The Star where he can write his columns surrounded by high brow journalism such as;Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He's an awful man but people are assuming he knew because of how much they dislike him and The Sun. Could he have known? Sure. Did he know? Probably not.Very obviously not racist if he didn't know Barkley's father is black. If he had known that then he's a nob. I can't see how he would know that, why would he?
Trust the scousers to pretend he did know so that they can claim racism.
How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.Very obviously not racist if he didn't know Barkley's father is black. If he had known that then he's a nob. I can't see how he would know that, why would he?
Trust the scousers to pretend he did know so that they can claim racism.
I think you're giving him way too much credit tbh.How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.
Classy statement and response from Everton FC.
Well he may not be as stupid as we all want him to be but he is arrogant enough not to do his research perhaps. Anyway, he's sunk and so is that dying rag.How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.
I had no idea Barkley was mixed race either. It's dodgy ground- it's fine to refer to Bale or George Bush as ape-like, but if they have black heritage unbeknown to you, you're suddenly a racist.To be fair, I don't think OP of this pic was highlighting his features. He does just look kinda gormless on those pictures, but catch just about anyone with a blank expression and you can say the same.
Anyway, McKenzie just needs to be ignored, he's done this purely to get a rise particularly with the Hillsborough anniversary coming up. Was the gorilla comment intended as a racial slur? Only he will know, I must admit I had no clue Barkley was mixed race.
Yeah agreed, it's his job to know ffs. Surely too if you get an article to proof read and they use a term like gorilla you check these things before you publish.How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.
Tbf, columns are usually bashed out last minute. If you're doing a hatchet job on a footballer in the news, it's unlikely many journos would research his family tree.How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.
And websites for embedding their tweets, quoting articles etc.All clubs should ban the cnuts.
How could he not know. It's publicly available information and it is a journalist's job to research the person they are writing about, especially if it is a hit piece. He knew, of that there can be no doubt.
Well if you're going to use a term like gorilla then you definitely need to check their families.Not sure what you mean by its 'publicly available' that's probably true (no one would hide it) but where and why would you check it? What's the scenario?
'I'm going to write a piece about David Dimbleby but first I'd better get the publicly available information and see where his parents came from...'
My pleasure. And on this day of all days it's a shame that as well as thinking of the 96 we also end up having to waste even a fraction of a watt of brain electricity thinking about scumbags like McKenzie and the rubbish they write.
Thanks for making me giggle !
JFT 96 .
You're less likely to if the bloke is white, looks a bit of a ginner and has an English name I reckon. I'm amazed he has black heritage tbh.Well if you're going to use a term like gorilla then you definitely need to check their families.
Then again you're probably not paid for doing research on athletes for articles.You're less likely to if the bloke is white, looks a bit of a ginner and has an English name I reckon. I'm amazed he has black heritage tbh.
Nor is Kelvin McKenzie. He's a gobsite with a 'sound-off' column. The pretence that there's an expectation for him to do research on who he writes about is borderline comical, frankly.Then again you're probably not paid for doing research on athletes for articles.
I'm sure you're better placed than most of us to know how journalism works to be fair, I just would have thought given the current climate for calling out racism you'd maybe think to double check.You're less likely to if the bloke is white, looks a bit of a ginner and has an English name I reckon. I'm amazed he has black heritage tbh.
Well it should be a default for "journalists". Now I know what The Sun is like, but he's paid to write about sports (don't know if the guy writes about other stuff too), so he should know more about the background of athletes than the average fan.Nor is Kelvin McKenzie. He's a gobsite with a 'sound-off' column. The pretence that there's an expectation for him to do research on who he writes about is borderline comical, frankly.
He's just a rent a rant-type columnist, much like Littlejohn, paid to get a reaction.Then again you're probably not paid for doing research on athletes for articles.
That's why he did it . He wanted a reaction and got one. What horrible twat that cnut is.My pleasure. And on this day of all days it's a shame that as well as thinking of the 96 we also end up having to waste even a fraction of a watt of brain electricity thinking about scumbags like McKenzie and the rubbish they write.
Well he sure got that. Still, that shouldn't excuse him for not doing any research.He's just a rent a rant-type columnist, much like Littlejohn, paid to get a reaction.
Ideally, but for most of us having the time is the main constraint. For him I'd imagine it's more laziness- I wouldn't be surprised if he's feeling like the bloke that asked a fat woman when her baby is due, inadvertently being offensive.I'm sure you're better placed than most of us to know how journalism works to be fair, I just would have thought given the current climate for calling out racism you'd maybe think to double check.
Although the guy is a twat and was probably just looking to ruffle feathers.