VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 32,947
You're equating this to Nazi Germany?This is all so fecking depressing. Early 1930s vibes.
You're equating this to Nazi Germany?This is all so fecking depressing. Early 1930s vibes.
No, I haven't been on for a few days. Thanks for asking, though.Do you just log on the caf every day with the intention of shitting on someone? A brief glance at your post history suggests you use this platform forum like twitter. You log on, find your target and spend a while having a go at them until they stop responding.
I will second that! She is always looking for an argument and encourages others to pile on until the poster in question gives up (fed up with arguing with her and her cohorts), then claims a “moral” victory. It’s an old and tired way of self promotion at the expense of people she doesn’t agree with. BoringDo you just log on the caf every day with the intention of shitting on someone? A brief glance at your post history suggests you use this platform forum like twitter. You log on, find your target and spend a while having a go at them until they stop responding.
You alright there?I will second that! She is always looking for an argument and encourages others to pile on until the poster in question gives up (fed up with arguing with her and her cohorts), then claims a “moral” victory. It’s an old and tired way of self promotion at the expense of people she doesn’t agree with. Boring
From what I have seen of his/her posts she challenges people until they feel uncomfortable about the position they have taken. I have never seen an issue with the quality of their arguments.I will second that! She is always looking for an argument and encourages others to pile on until the poster in question gives up (fed up with arguing with her and her cohorts), then claims a “moral” victory. It’s an old and tired way of self promotion at the expense of people she doesn’t agree with. Boring
Marauding right wing gangs, spurred on by corporate fascists and their media outlets, shooting people in the street and not being convicted, reminds me of the Weimar Republic.You're equating this to Nazi Germany?
Yep. You?You alright there?
Agree to disagreeFrom what I have seen of his/her posts she challenges people until they feel uncomfortable about the position they have taken. I have never seen an issue with the quality of their arguments.
Fair enough mate. Not everyone see’s eye to eye.Agree to disagree
I don't mind people taking issue with quality, but I'm usually the one who stops responding first so that's a pretty bizarre allegation. It's also intereresting how mr Bacon Sandwich took a quick look at my comment history, because I'm pretty sure it's private to non-staff.From what I have seen of his/her posts she challenges people until they feel uncomfortable about the position they have taken. I have never seen an issue with the quality of their arguments.
Yep it’s all quite bizarre. Guess the fallout from this will run for a long long time.What an absolute farce.
She’s never made me feel uncomfortable. She and others have had me thread banned. Hard to have a convo with thatFair enough mate. Not everyone see’s eye to eye.
Alright.Marauding right wing gangs, spurred on by corporate fascists and their media outlets, shooting people in the street and not being convicted, reminds me of the Weimar Republic.
Quite tired after a long week but this trial of Soph is perking me up.Yep. You?
She’s never made me feel uncomfortable. She and others have had me thread banned. Hard to have a convo with that
Yeah, natural born killers - the kenosha edition... and a part of the media is loving itWhat an absolute farce.
If you search posts by username in the search function it shows them regardless of it you have profile set to privateI don't mind people taking issue with quality, but I'm usually the one who stops responding first so that's a pretty bizarre allegation. It's also intereresting how mr Bacon Sandwich took a quick look at my comment history, because I'm pretty sure it's private to non-staff.
You can still find past post by searching specific words and terms and filtering by usernames.I don't mind people taking issue with quality, but I'm usually the one who stops responding first so that's a pretty bizarre allegation. It's also intereresting how mr Bacon Sandwich took a quick look at my comment history, because I'm pretty sure it's private to non-staff.
If you search posts by username in the search function it shows them regardless of it you have profile set to private
You can still find past post by searching specific words and terms and filtering by usernames.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's not really a laughing matter.Alright.
@AllGoodNamesRGone was just looking for posts about my bum and boobs but it can be used for other research.Well, there you go. That's dedication!
I wouldn’t know, I can’t comment on that. Maybe the thread banning were fair or maybe not.She’s never made me feel uncomfortable. She and others have had me thread banned. Hard to have a convo with that
Taking thread off topic. Deserves an infraction@AllGoodNamesRGone was just looking for posts about my bum and boobs but it can be used for other research.
I speak the truth but yeah I'll behaveI wouldn’t know, I can’t comment on that. Maybe the thread banning were fair or maybe not.
Taking thread off topic. Deserves an infraction
Media outlets indeed -- they're the ones guilty of making a mess out of this case making us believe he was some mass shooter.Marauding right wing gangs, spurred on by corporate fascists and their media outlets, shooting people in the street and not being convicted, reminds me of the Weimar Republic.
Not what I said. Can you not read? We're talking about how he's being treated and celebrated after his death. His criminal history isn't why he died. If you want the reason he died, aside from the poor choices made by Rittenhouse in being out there that night, it was because he was hyper aggressive and out with the sole purpose of starting fires and stomping heads.And that's what people like you don't get. That people don't think people should be killed just because they're bad.
Remember those quotes of yours that dumbo pulled up, on how you react to things based on what race the victims are? They showed you in a pretty shit light, you're as far from a "martyr" someone on Redcafe can get. However, I'm not Jeff so if someone shoots you I'd still say they probably shouldn't have done that.
A guy who goes into a crowd with an assault rifle and shoots people is not a mass shooter? What the feck is wrong with you?Media outlets indeed -- they're the ones guilty of making a mess out of this case making us believe he was some mass shooter.
This is the only logical thing since already knows how to work the crowd.He'll be on Dancing With The Stars in a year or two.
A 'mass shooting' needs to have four victims per the government.A guy who goes into a crowd with an assault rifle and shoots people is not a mass shooter? What the feck is wrong with you?
If expressing a different point of view warrants a thread ban, then I’ll discontinue conversing with said posters.I wouldn’t know, I can’t comment on that. Maybe the thread banning were fair or maybe not.
I never saw them so have no opinion on it so yes, let’s get the thread back on topic before @Scarlett Dracarys tskes it off topic again with nefarious claims.If expressing a different point of view warrants a thread ban, then I’ll discontinue conversing with said posters.
Let’s get the thread back on topic, shall we?
Is this post satirical or just plain ignorant?Marauding right wing gangs, spurred on by corporate fascists and their media outlets, shooting people in the street and not being convicted, reminds me of the Weimar Republic.
What about the whole picture did I get wrong?Is this post satirical or just plain ignorant?
I know there were 2 lesser-included but Wisconsin seems to work differently than what I've seen. I've seen cases more like 3 charges, say 3rd-degree murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide and the jury would deliberate on each charge from greatest to least based on the set of criteria. From what I heard of the jury instructions Wisconsin or maybe just this judge instructed a bit differently than what I've personally seen before.Im not convinced he would have even been found guilty of Wisconsin statute 948.60 because the statute was written by an idiot and if you read the statute in its entirety Rittenhouse technically didnt even violate that law the way it is written. You can argue what the law probably meant vs what it says word for word, but seeing as its a class A misdemeanor in wisconsin i can understand why little time if any was put on this angle.
I cant say i agree about what would have influenced the jury, i can however say the really big charges as it applied to the gun were left in by the judge. I think the fact that the gun was illegal would have been more impactful in other parts of the world or even other parts of USA. But certainly not in Wisconsin as it would appear.
the prosecution did my friend.
COUNT 2: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
COUNT 3: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
these two counts also had the dangerous weapons modifier that would have added extra five years on top of the 2 counts of reckless endangering. Which further puts the illegal weapons charge as a red hearing.
That's fine if you want to only speak about what can be objectively proven (Rittenhouse running right after the group).Yes I’ve seen your multiple posts about this “chase” and I’ve seen the video. But it hasn’t been proven afaik that he was pursuing anyone. All that can be proven is that he was running in that direction. His intent no one can know or prove, though his “threatening” or aggressive nature is subjective.
I find it crazy that a German gentleman would attempt to make the comparison. Especially citing “corporate fascists and their media outlets” as comparative.What about the whole picture did I get wrong?
Agree with everything here but the ‘fringes’ comment. Overt racism is a bit more engrained & widespread.I find it crazy that a German gentleman would attempt to make the comparison. Especially citing “corporate fascists and their media outlets” as comparative.
I strongly suggest you look up some of the Weimar printed media from around 1926 on. If anything close was published in the US the fbi would be kicking the door down.
If that’s not evidence enough, look up evidence from state parliaments of that era and you will find ample example.
I’m simply incredulous at the fact you feel it’s comparable in any way shape or form. Overt racism is on the very fringes of society. You won’t find a single credible media outlet running cartoons with blacks as monkeys or child killers. If a member of the House of Representatives says nutty crap (hi Marjorie) they’ll be called out and ridiculed for it. And I must have missed the 200,000 strong ideologically driven paramilitary army dominating the streets too.
I’ll ask it another way: what actual (real not perceived) similarities are there that you see?