Lord SInister
Full Member
As @Invictus said, what makes him eligible for GOAT debate apart from his accomplishments are, are his talent as a player. He is arguably the greatest goal scorer, dribbler and playmaker of all time, all rolled into one.
Tbf we don't know the debate has been shredded. Someone should re-open the Messi v Ronaldo poll so we can see.You have to almost feel sorry for the Ronaldo fanboys like @Cal? and @SportingCP96 who have spent so much time and energy in a debate that has got shredded in a matter of minutes.
Tbf, you literally just needed to watch them….& all that energy could have been better spent elsewhere…You have to almost feel sorry for the Ronaldo fanboys like @Cal? and @SportingCP96 who have spent so much time and energy in a debate that has got shredded in a matter of minutes.
Great write-up.It is, still. That's the nature of the beast, I suppose. The margins are soo fine and unquantifiable at the very top that you can have a preference for one or other while maintaining an air of reasonability. But someone who reckons Messi is the absolute greatest can now make exceptionally strong and objective arguments for practically every metric of greatness (maybe the strongest of all). Personally speaking, yes — he is the greatest and the best, by a slight but poignant margin. Just so complete in that he could score at a similar rate to Müller or Cristiano, dribble at a comparable level to Maradona or Best when they were on song, and slice open opposition defenses with an offensive passing range that rivaled the likes of Laudrup or Zico. No one else was as mindbogglingly good when you combine all three aspects of attacking play. When you consider that component with his legacy as the leading edge of one of the most fearsome and iconic teams of all time, personal and collective accomplishments (with this World Cup and the Golden Ball being the cherries on top), and staggering longevity (the wee fella has been the best or one of the very best for 15 years now), it's as close as you can get to an ironclad case. Then you have Mr. Pelé, the former “greatest footballer of all time” — the unsurpassed benchmark for half-a-century. Followed by Maradona, another “greatest footballer of all time” candidate and arguably the most profound talent in the history of the sport. And finally the duo of Beckenbauer and Di Stéfano to round off the subjective Top 5.
P.S. Cristiano is thereabouts too. Ditto Cruyff. Didn't mean to disparage him (or them). All of these were era-defining titans, no doubt about that — just ahead of Puskás, Platini, Baresi, Zico, Fenômeno, Xavi, Meazza, Best, Müller, Garrincha, Eusébio, van Basten, Zidane, Maldini, Charlton, Matthäus and other wonderful, wonderful masters of football.
Yep, people forget that the PL was rather average from 2012 to 2017 and before that, it wasn't exactly better than La Liga.Messi played in the best league. For most of a decade.
Except he was the best player in the final? He scored two, played a lovely pass for another and created so much from the middle of the park - he pretty much had a good game for the entire 120 (probably excluding a stretch of 10-15 mind where ARG were stunned)You can't call Messi the GOAT because of one match, when he didn't even score a great goal in the final. He wasn't even the best player in the match.
That being said be is the Greatest of all Time.
Yep, it's definitely nonsense. Aside from anything else, it would mean a player would be precluded from being the greatest if they happened to be born in a weak enough country.There's no argument for anybody bar Messi being the GOAT, and there wasn't before this world cup either. World cups are massively important for countries and players really want to win them, but the quality of a champions league is higher. This idea that you have to win the WC to be the GOAT is nonsense. That's my two cents
What about Pelé? Also perfect goalscorer., dribbler and playmaker rolled into one.It is, still. That's the nature of the beast, I suppose. The margins are soo fine and unquantifiable at the very top that you can have a preference for one or other while maintaining an air of reasonability. But someone who reckons Messi is the absolute greatest can now make exceptionally strong and objective arguments for practically every metric of greatness (maybe the strongest of all). Personally speaking, yes — he is the greatest and the best, by a slight but poignant margin. Just so complete in that he could score at a similar rate to Müller or Cristiano, dribble at a comparable level to Maradona or Best when they were on song, and slice open opposition defenses with an offensive passing range that rivaled the likes of Laudrup or Zico. No one else was as mindbogglingly good when you combine all three aspects of attacking play. When you consider that component with his legacy as the leading edge of one of the most fearsome and iconic teams of all time, personal and collective accomplishments (with this World Cup and the Golden Ball being the cherries on top), and staggering longevity (the wee fella has been the best or one of the very best for 15 years now), it's as close as you can get to an ironclad case. Then you have Mr. Pelé, the former “greatest footballer of all time” — the unsurpassed benchmark for half-a-century. Followed by Maradona, another “greatest footballer of all time” candidate and arguably the most profound talent in the history of the sport. And finally the duo of Beckenbauer and Di Stéfano to round off the subjective Top 5.
P.S. Cristiano is thereabouts too. Ditto Cruyff. Didn't mean to disparage him (or them). All of these were era-defining titans, no doubt about that — just ahead of Puskás, Platini, Baresi, Zico, Fenômeno, Xavi, Meazza, Best, Müller, Garrincha, Eusébio, van Basten, Zidane, Maldini, Charlton, Matthäus and other wonderful, wonderful masters of football.
It does help when VAR even gifts him offside goals.You have to almost feel sorry for the Ronaldo fanboys like @Cal? and @SportingCP96 who have spent so much time and energy in a debate that has got shredded in a matter of minutes.
Which goal was offside?It does help when VAR even gifts him offside goals.
But it is what it is, based on his achievements, he's GOAT, there I said it, happy?
He'll never succeed as a BPL CB.He's short
Right there in the first few posts.This thread needs to be reopened to answer and agree with the op 14 years later: https://www.redcafe.net/threads/lionel-messi.225097/
Yes
He should win the World Cup with Argentina to be regarded as THE best ever.
Add to that, he is one of the most decorated players ever, having won: 1 World Cup, 1 Continental Cup, 4 UCLs, 11 league titles (will be 12 in a few months), 7 National Cups, 7 Ballon D'Ors, 2 World Cup Golden Balls, 6 European Golden Shoes. He is the highest assist maker in the history of football and the third top scorer (with less than 30 goals than the top one so has a chance of finishing first).As @Invictus said, what makes him eligible for GOAT debate apart from his accomplishments are, are his talent as a player. He is arguably the greatest goal scorer, dribbler and playmaker of all time, all rolled into one.
Holy shit.It does help when VAR even gifts him offside goals.
But it is what it is, based on his achievements, he's GOAT, there I said it, happy?
What offside goals? They had like 4 offside goals disallowed in a row vs Saudi ArabiaIt does help when VAR even gifts him offside goals.
But it is what it is, based on his achievements, he's GOAT, there I said it, happy?
I'm never going to watch this match or any highlights of it ever, I thought his tap-in was offside, but frankly don't care.Which goal was offside?
Cal said Messi is GOAT, who cares about him accusing Messi of offside goalsWhich goal was offside?
Of course it wasn't.I'm never going to watch this match or any highlights of it ever, I thought his tap-in was offside, but frankly don't care.
No need to think that anymore, it wasn't offside.I'm never going to watch this match or any highlights of it ever, I thought his tap-in was offside, but frankly don't care.
Nopes in our screen they showed it clearly in animation. It clearly wasnt.I'm never going to watch this match or any highlights of it ever, I thought his tap-in was offside, but frankly don't care.