RedRover
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 8,962
Someone in the know is signing the cheques - its not for the manager to look after the purse strings, he asks for a player and the club trys to get him, if not then I suspect they move on to other targets. That system works perfectly well everywhere else.So hang on. The owner gave the manager £30m of his own money to spend. The manager sneakily spends £45m of the owner's money instead, using add on clauses, then whinges about needing more money to spend...owner sacks manager.
How on earth is it the owner who is the one in the wrong in this situation? How many jobs are you not going to get sacked from when you use £15m of someone else's money without their permission, then claim you'll fail due to not being allowed to spend enough money?
It's about the most non-rash football manager sacking in history
He may have had cause to sack the bloke in charge of transfers - but he severly undermines his position by then appointing a 23 year old who is a friend of his son and had been painting the stand a few weeks back.
The man is an utter lunatic - simple as that. He's the finest example of everything that is wrong with football in this country, and if it wasnt for the fans I'd be very much hoping they'd be relegated and he'd lose a fortune.