Come on Jose had a better season than Pep last year. Plus if you want to really look honestly into it Pep inherited a much better team and squad. City downed tools under Pelegrini hence the 4th place finish (most people had them as favourites for the league). Peps first season was underwhelming as was Jose but Jose still produced 2 trophies. The improvement is being seen at old Trafford with a lot of deadwood being moved on and players like Lukaku and Pogba signing, over at City you have signed some very good players but it's the old guard who are still your best players compared to us but Sane and Jesus do look great prospects. My point is Pep has a far better squad to start with Hart, Kompany, Fernd x2, KDB, Augero, Sterling, Silva all top top premier league players. United had DDG, Valencia, Herrera, Mata at most.
Jose did indeed have a better season in the end but as most you guys openly admit it came down to one game vs Ajax. Had you lost that would you be saying the same?
My point was more to show that was a huge exaggeration on the team Pep inherited and played with. You have listed Hart, Fernd x2 and a constantly injured CB in the good players Pep inherited.
Fernando never gets a game and was a shocking signing,
Kompany always injured.
Hart is an ok keeper with a huge flaw thats been ruthlessly exposed (in reality he's been terrible at City for 2 years, Torino for a year, and had a poor start at West Ham).
That team didn't down tools, we had a backline of cripples and old men. You guys underrate how poor we had become under Pellers. The way the squad Mancini and Cook built was replaced with journeymen. In reality we had a slightly stronger squad than you guys. Man for man going into last season City had KDB, Silva, Aguero, Sterling and Fernandinho who is borderline. United had DDG, Valencia, Herrera, Mata and dare I say Martial whose breakout season was easily a match for Sterling.
We both had alot of dead wood and are moving it on. We've also both bought well and spent stupid money.
Heres an example of City's failings and fall under Pelligrini (I'm not saying he is to blame but some has to be for this recruitment). Just look at the following under Pellers reign we spent hundreds of millions to do the following.
Mancini St - Aguero, Tevez, Dzeko, Balotelli (who craziness aside was good for us)
Pellegrini St - Aguero, Iheanacho, Bony
Mancini FB - Peak Zabs, a decent Micah Richards, Clichy and Kolarov in their peak years.
Pellers FB - Old Zabs, Old Kola, Old Clichy and Sagna..
Mancini CB - Kompany, Kolo Toure, Nastasic, Lescott.
Pellers - Kompany, Otamendi, Demechilis, Mangala
The only place we can argue we're stronger now despite all the money pissed away is Midfield and I'd go so far as to say Mancini's final midfield of Barry, Toure, Silva, Nasri and Milner was more balanced that anything we had under Pellers too...
The reasons for us expecting to win the league under Pelligrini is that yes we had a top squad, but it was only a top squad because of the struggles of you guys, Arsenal and Chelsea having blips here and there. We were slightly better than alot of other very average teams and Pellers only top team was the one he inherited from Mancini.
It was a slow erosion of a top squad with the likes of Mangala, Fernando, Bony's and Jesus Navas replacing the Savic (what a defender he's become), Barry, Dzeko and Milners.
Chelsea sorted their shit out with the return of Jose and the sudden emergence of Spurs have shown us for what we were. The best squad of a bunch of very average squads. I'll even say I overrated the squad a tad and Pep dropped a massive clanger with the fullbacks last season. During Pellers reign we wen't from a team who hadn't finished outside the top 2 in years to a team who fell over the line to qualify for the CL two years running.
This again?
Does City display 3rd finish trophy?
There is a reason, other clubs didn't go in for Gundogan. No one forced City to take that gamble. They do it by their own will, no excuse. Helping player to settle is also the club responsibility. If it doesn't work out, the player is deemed as flop. Again no excuse.
Pep pretty much spent money 2 times in 2 positions, so there is problem with the initial 2 signings aka wasting some fee. That can't be used as an excuse. The fee we paid look comparable to City but with context it was not. We paid for previous world record fee. It was a statement signing about our status since we were not in CL. Pogba commercial value alone during his contract length would be sufficient to justify the fee, let line his on pitch contribution. Any signings from City these past 2 season are comparable?
...
Not joining the other part of the debate.
Ok I'll bite, no there is no place for a 3rd place trophy but lets be honest here. The only reason you were in the Europa League was because you failed. Its hard to win something your not in and being even more honest and as arrogant and all as it sounds from a City fan. I never want to win it because its a B tier trophy, a great trophy for teams like West Ham, Southampton etc.. but being in it is an embarrassment and failure on a part of a squad costing what any of the top premiership squads have, particularly City, United or Chelsea.
Don't even try to compare it with the other trophies you have in your great history, its a joke in comparison and all it will do in future decades is remind you guys of how low Moyes and LVG took you. I have no doubt Jose will put you back at the top and you will all be like remember that time we won the Europa... hard times but the start of a rebuild.
Money two times in 2 positions, please expand, the only position he's replaced is goalkeeper and Bravo arrived for £16m which is pocket change in todays market. Statement my arse, you paid that money for Pogba because he's a great player and all great players cost money. You didn't overpay, you didn't break the world record to sign a name and please stop with the commerical shite,
Pogba was bought as a footballer. On last season alone he hasn't justified the fee but this season he is already starting to justify it and if he stays with you guys for many years it will turn out to be a cheap deal.
Any signings from City comparable to Pogba? Why would there be. We both needed different things, City needed youth, pace and an injection of legs and energy and we went and got them. United needed a couple of good midfielders and a centre forward and they got them too. Was the potential £90m for Lukaku a commercial deal too? or the £56m that Martial will eventually cost? Pull the other one and stop, They were players you needed for very big fee's, just like City have paid. Good players who cost good money (crazy money in the current market) but if they hit their targets will be worth it, if they don't they won't simple as. Pogba, like Lukaku or KDB or Sterling will be judged on what the team win or lose while he's there and that is how his value when people decide whether he's a flop or roaring success will see things.
City have a squad assembled for half a billion, you have a squad assembled for half a billion. Stop moving the goalposts to make out Jose is rebuilding West Ham. He has pretty much the same job on as Pep albeit the squads having different holes which is exactly why I was pointing out how silly the OP was by reversing names. It is just as silly of me or any City fan to make the same claims of Jose.