I remember when we were linked with Andy Carroll, that was bad. Rather have him than this 1 in 5 douche bag.
You would rather have Andy Carroll than Arnautovic? Seriously?I remember when we were linked with Andy Carroll, that was bad. Rather have him than this 1 in 5 douche bag.
They're both shit but yes. Arnautovic is nearly 30 and has had half a good season in his career. Carroll is a perma-crock but I'd still just about prefer him.You would rather have Andy Carroll than Arnautovic? Seriously?
Arnautovic is a decent footballer. Carroll is just shit.They're both shit but yes. Arnautovic is nearly 30 and has had half a good season in his career. Carroll is a perma-crock but I'd still just about prefer him.
Edit: when say shit, I mean for a side with title aspirations.
Carroll certainly has less skill but i'd argue is far more effective and therefore a better footballer (being a footballer is not just about ball control in my eyes).Arnautovic is a decent footballer. Carroll is just shit.
I agree that Arnoutovic wouldn’t necessarily be seen as a quality signing for any side in the top 4 but he’s head and shoulders above Carroll as a footballer.
I think it would be an interesting signing to be honest.
Whilst it’s true football isn’t only about ball control, Arnoutovic has been far more effective this season than Carroll. 11 goals is a brilliant return from someone who isn’t even really a striker. I’m not sure how many assists he has but I’d wager it’s quite a few as well. Whereas Carroll has 3 goals from 25 appearances which is quite frankly shocking for a centre forward.Carroll certainly has less skill but i'd argue is far more effective and therefore a better footballer (being a footballer is not just about ball control in my eyes).
There is a fair bit of talent in Arnautovic but talent is almost worthless without the right attitude. Arnautovic has had a great few months at West Ham, is that really enough to warrant a move to Manchester United?
Whilst it’s true football isn’t only about ball control, Arnoutovic has been far more effective this season than Carroll. 11 goals is a brilliant return from someone who isn’t even really a striker. I’m not sure how many assists he has but I’d wager it’s quite a few as well. Whereas Carroll has 3 goals from 25 appearances which is quite frankly shocking for a centre forward.
There's no way Caroll played 25 games this season, nowhere near than number he's been injured.
So you're predicting that Martial won't improve on his game at all? He's still not the finished article. You must have a crystal ball huh?Lets see where Martial is playing at that age.
He'll be in the French League and he won't be playing for PSG put it that way.
He's not a footballer's footballer. Terrible off the ball movement. And then people on here wonder why all the ex-pro's in the media give him a hard time.
Maybe, don't think West Ham would go for it.What about loans, Rashford to play striker for them for a year while we get Arnautovic for a year?
"If SAF was still here" needs to die. He's never coming back, and we'll never see another SAF. The argument of what SAF would have done has been such a hindering to what a new manager is trying to do, and frankly he's playing in a new era too and has another approach. We can't hire a guy who have won so much in his own way, and ask him to be another manager. Imitating will never lead to actually being the original.Why does it have to be one or the other? Why not both in the line up? If SAF was still here we would be playing a 4-4-2 and only go to one striker for the big away matches...
SAF stopped using 2 strikers as a main tactic 15 years ago."If SAF was still here" needs to die. He's never coming back, and we'll never see another SAF. The argument of what SAF would have done has been such a hindering to what a new manager is trying to do, and frankly he's playing in a new era too and has another approach. We can't hire a guy who have won so much in his own way, and ask him to be another manager. Imitating will never lead to actually being the original.
I'm not pro 2 strikers/forwards neither, but I'll add to this that we stopped having a main tactic to be more versatile. He switched a lot between tactics and we did see the 2 strikers tactic several times against lower teams, and when pushing for a result behind behind.SAF stopped using 2 strikers as a main tactic 15 years ago.
He either utilized a fluid front three (Rooney, Tevez, Ronaldo), or a striker with support forwards (Striker + Rooney). He adapted to the modern game and realized you couldn't carry a striker and needed forwards that linked the midfield to the attack.
Which was my point, 4-4-2 with two genuine strikers wasn't something that SAF built the team to do anymore.I'm not pro 2 strikers/forwards neither, but I'll add to this that we stopped having a main tactic to be more versatile. He switched a lot between tactics and we did see the 2 strikers tactic several times against lower teams, and when pushing for a result behind behind.
Rashford hasn’t been useless he’s a young player going through ups and downs.The resistance to a backup striker is odd.. If Lukaku breaks his leg in September, what's the plan? Rashford?! For all the time and belief the club and fans have shown, he's been useless.
We need someone in, and the thought of a 32 year old mandzukic who's already seen and done it all fills me with dread.
Jose needs to be more adaptive with the squad. Expecting Rashford to play like Lukaku when the latter is injured is just poor management in my eyes.The resistance to a backup striker is odd.. If Lukaku breaks his leg in September, what's the plan? Rashford?! For all the time and belief the club and fans have shown, he's been useless.
We need someone in, and the thought of a 32 year old mandzukic who's already seen and done it all fills me with dread.
I never said anything about imitating. I don't just see why we always have to have 3 centre midfielders and only 1 striker. It's not like we can't win the midfield battle against most teams in the league with Matic and Pogba. And I am just really craving to see us play an exciting brand of football again..."If SAF was still here" needs to die. He's never coming back, and we'll never see another SAF. The argument of what SAF would have done has been such a hindering to what a new manager is trying to do, and frankly he's playing in a new era too and has another approach. We can't hire a guy who have won so much in his own way, and ask him to be another manager. Imitating will never lead to actually being the original.
Does Mourinho actually expect Rashford to play like Lukaku?Jose needs to be more adaptive with the squad. Expecting Rashford to play like Lukaku when the latter is injured is just poor management in my eyes.
There is no reason why a manager who adapts his tactics per opponent cannot do the same depending on the type of striker is available.
That's fine, but he has been plenty useless for large parts of this season. He should go have his ups and downs elsewhere, because he's not improved one bit in the last two years. Loan deal, then get a proper backup striker in.Rashford hasn’t been useless he’s a young player going through ups and downs.
Think its more likely just reporters throwing names at walls, and hoping it sticks.This would be awful and just adds fuel to the fire in terms of we don't know what the feck we're doing with player recruitment.