Nope
Naive.
Accurate **
Careful now, you are doing exactly what you've been running around asking others not to.
We should have completely cut ties with him the moment that audio was released.
Cool that you think that.
he would have sued the club into oblivion
You are right. There is no argument here. What you have just argued is to punish people based on few photos and 20 second audio clip of a longer audio clip which United officials reviewed and came to conclusions that Greenwood didnt commit the offence he is accused of. Due process and courts dont really matter. The alleged victim not collaborating the offences that Greenwood allegedly committed also doesn’t matter. Just what random internet stranger feels about the situation matters. Whether it wrecks the life of a person who is not convicted or the person the morality police is trying to protect is completely irrelevant.
It amuses me greatly you keep trying. Bless you
Don't resort to hyperbole. His life isn't going to be ruined because he's no longer able to earn millions playing for United
This club is managed by accountants. Do you think they'd throw away a 100 billion asset if it was possible to keep him? I don't think so.
I agree somewhat but where i disagree is in my belief that it's a privilege to play for any top club and earn millions (i also believe the same of managerial positions, even moreso because many of those jobs are rent-seeking). Plus many of the players say it. My overall point is that it is not an entitlement and footballers can lose the right to play for a club if the club deems their conduct misaligned with the brand, which is what ended up happening with Greenwood in the end.
There's the feigning, predictable but very disappointing nonetheless.It amuses me greatly you keep trying. Bless you
Before any further details or prosecution? Not in a lawful state
Businesses do it all the time. Threshold for reasonably dismissing someone is way different to the threshold for prosecution.
Again, cute
If the same material were posted online involving me, and my boss/colleagues found it, I'd certainly expect to be ordered into the office the following day shortly followed by being handed my p45. But that's just me. Would you expect to continue your job as normal?
He will receive 7 million because he has a contract for the next two years. That's more money than most people earn in a lifetime. Even if he has already spent all the millions he has earned in the past, he can use these 7 million to live his whole life without needing to work ever again, and his wife and kids as well.
I lied, one more comment:Again, cute
And you will continue too, you can't help yourself, we both know that!
I very much. doubt it....especially if you're known to the public...theyre going to conclude that you and or your partner are a liabilities and unreliable re the image you project and here with sponsors
Mate zouma gets stick for kicking a cat
My partner does ice skating, and if she ever decided to take photos of the bruises she has after a few falls, I'd be in prison too. I've not been in defence or support of Greenwood through this, but why are people acting like a 15 second clip and 3 photos of some bruises are the pinnacle of truth? To me it seems like an incredibly easy thing to feign with makeup and the audio clip, while horrid, could also easily be a snippet out of a longer discussion, edited to look exceptionally bad?
Without any context/elaboration or trial? Thank god none of ye are judges/attorneys anyway
This thread is 100 pages long, all this stuff has been discussed in great detail. There are plenty of reasonable explanations to this question.
The flip side of your second point is that United is the environment he was in for most of his life. Not that I am saying being at United is what caused this, but he has been at United all his life and ended up having these issues that he has, so is it really the best place for him to try to get over this? With that in mind perhaps a change of environment might be best for him going forward. If the club do want to help, which it seems like they do, then him being somewhere else but still having the support of the club might be best for him and his family in the long run. I have no idea what rehabilitation from something like this is like but I can't imagine it is easy or straightforward.
Literally was captain.
Did they? From Arnold’s statement:
Had United had access to that recording, they’d have mentioned it. The statements are very clear as to the difficulties they had in getting evidence. A simple statement of “Having reviewed the recording in its entirety, we have concluded….etc” would have given them much more credibility. They don’t say it because they can’t.
I’m sorry but that is never a signal that we should forgive and forget. A great deal of people who go through domestic abuse end up returning to the culprit.
So why would nobody come out publicly and confirm that these injuries were faked then? Also, why would nobody give more context for the audio. The fact that you call the audio a 'discussion' btw is a pretty big red flag.
These cocksuckers running this club are shameless. Why do they think they're best placed to rehabilitate, especially when they've handled him so poorly in the first place? Secondly, they clearly wouldn't be saying things like this if it was some no- mark player.
Why would CPS drop the case if the pictures and audio were evidence of a serious crime?
I wonder if they would have tactical photos to protect this no-mark player as well. You are damn right they are salty not getting their own way, signing off their statement 'this isn't the end of the matter'
Very sad. I had a feeling it would be a lot more to this than what the media have fed us.
I agree. The club along with Mason himself taking responsibility could have followed a step by step plan. Slowly, but with endeavor and determination there would have been light at the end of the tunnel.
