criticalanalysis
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 6,315
I'm impressed.
The highlight videos of him last season were indeed quite representative.
The highlight videos of him last season were indeed quite representative.
Assume he is going on loan then.
I'd say whoever the best team around that can make him #1 and plays the ball out from the back.Wonder where he will be next season, can't see another Czech loan as good progress, don't want him to stay as #2 and get no game time, I think PL may be a step too far at the moment, perhaps a top Championship team?
It would be a shame we can't bring a goalie through the ranks for a change. Not since Stepney?That would be a good move.
Bringing any player through is difficult, but GK even more so. There was a small chance before Onana, but with him here there is no point to keep him.It would be a shame we can't bring a goalie through the ranks for a change. Not since Stepney?
Stepney was bought from Chelsea. The Doc bought him to Chelsea from Milwall but he already had Peter Bonetti as first choice so he solh him to UnitedIt would be a shame we can't bring a goalie through the ranks for a change. Not since Stepney?
That must be a kick in the bollocks for Henderson’s ego. The fact everyone knows we’re actively trying to sell him and he’s desperate to leave but Villa have decided to skip right over him and look at the kid in the academy.
Martinez has been linked with AtleticoWe shouldn't sell him, he looks like a very promising keeper. And why would he swap Villa's bench for United's?
Cheers!Stepney was bought from Chelsea. The Doc bought him to Chelsea from Milwall but he already had Peter Bonetti as first choice so he solh him to United
Seriously?! 6m?! We’d better include a huge sell-on clause.
Precisely.Seriously?! 6m?! We’d better include a huge sell-on clause.
It should be more than 50%, which Villa definitely will not go with. He just won Sparta the league and was GK of the season. Surely that should get us more than that Trafford kid.Precisely.
Plus considering how much City sold their academy goalie to Burnley.... we have a league title player going for half?It should be more than 50%, which Villa definitely will not go with. He just won Sparta the league and was GK of the season. Surely that should get us more than that Trafford kid.
First refusal might not great because if he does well, he would potentially go for top dollar and unless he becomes better than Onana, we will not spend big money on him. A low buyback, on the other hand, would make sense if our asking is really £6m, where if he does well, we can buy him back and sell him on.That is from the Express....but if we are to base some of the outgoings for our youth players, a sell on and right of first refusal may be in order
Yeah I mentioned Trafford in my previous post.Plus considering how much City sold their academy goalie to Burnley.... we have a league title player going for half?
We did get burnt on Zaha with that sell-on clause.
That's the problem with big sell on clauses, the club selling see the 100m offer for their player as a 60m offer so they'll reject it, wanting a bigger slice of the pie.Zaha’s sell-on was reported to be 40% if I recall correctly? We really did get burnt on that. Could have been a nice sum.
Cash rollbacks to some crypto accounts after such deals, maybe?Unsure how City manage to get top dollar and generous clauses in their unknown talent?
He is, been linked with both loan and permanent moves but still here.Is he still with us? Any possibility of him being the No2 this season? Looked great in first couple of preseason games.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not sure if Leverkusen does such clauses, as their entire model is about making profit from cheap punts.There should be a considerable sell-on clause, he's worth more than that.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date