Blokhin took a lot of criticism after his performance at 82, i don't think many players had came out of that one with much credit in any printed media at the time, other than Demyanenko, Dasayev and maybe Hovhannisyan(who didn't get much game time) and other defenders Chivadze/Baltacha/Sulakvelidze. It's an interesting one from a coaching perspective, as basically it was the managers of the three best teams in the country as a super-coaching team, and Beskov/lobanovsky both dictatorial with very different views of the game. A modern equivalent would be llike Pep and Mourinho trying to run a team together.
It worked well when initially implemented in autumn '81, but eventually resulted in a disappointing WC performance compared to the mostly excellent games in the previous 2 years. Also one of those things that has it's conspiracies/fan myths around it, like only supposed to have been a training camp thing or for a few games (with beskov still as main coach) until the football authorities forced Beskov to accept a triumvirate due to the good results, or that Beskov was entirely deposed behind the scenes after the Brazil game and Lobanovsky really the one in charge by the end, players had eventually formed club based cliques and discounting tactics from the others, Blokhin had become an ego fuelled primadonna no longer interested in working for the team etc...
Of course, these things can get exaggerated by fans and journalists over the years. It's entirely possible the team simply peaked too early, or the extra pressure of the WC somewhat inhibited play were just as big a factor as the managing trio being a failed experiment. It's not like the football played was really any worse than West Germany offered in getting to the final, nor hit the lows that would usually have seen a team eliminated that was first group stage Italy. Things just didn't quite click, and the tournament probably came a year too late for Blokhin, who was having to adapt his style by then.