Abraxas
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2021
- Messages
- 6,062
That's exactly the point. Under ETH there is zero doubt about who is in control and who is responsible for the football we play. A manager that manages and has authority at the club. He wouldn't even think about outsourcing a footballing philosophy to a bloody coach on a fraction of the wage and who has a fraction of the responsibility, because he knows they're just an extension of him and ultimately that can't save him or bring us success. I'm fairly sure he would find it embarrassing to ever suggest that after poor performances what we saw is van der Gaag's or McLaren's coaching.We don’t talk about VdG because ETH controls everything. The only reason we spoke so much about Carrick/McKenna is Ole hung them out to dry and even supposedly refused extra coaches when offered.
To then say what we see on the pitch is Carrick's coaching is in complete contradiction of this fairly obvious idea that managers are tasked with overall responsibility. What we saw is the mess Ole created. A bunch of players with little respect for the manager, no footballing direction, scattergun transfers that weren't good enough. That's why I'm kind of confused that you say it "makes sense" to suggest that what we saw was Carrick's coaching when actually what we saw was about way more than that.
.