MyOnlySolskjaer
Creator of Player Performance threads
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly, the board written off the season.The signs were there in January. Instead of strengthening the squad, even with cheap options, we just loaned out players.
Just avoid the British market.
But the Glazers took their dividends un January. So it was a good January to them. Not so much to the club.The signs were there in January. Instead of strengthening the squad, even with cheap options, we just loaned out players.
And Longstaff could possibly our main CM if Newcastle didn't put ridiculous price tag.I think the club should avoid £50m plus signings for a little while anyway. Most, if not all, of the big money signings have been dreadful. Hopefully Rangnick and the scouts can uncover some players that suit the new manager's system but I won't hold my breath - someone in the club recommended Wan-Bissaka be bought for £50m.
Sure but I doubt our managerial targets will be excited by the idea of taking on a club with huge expectations which is slashing transfer budgets and getting schooled by its rivals.OK so we can't throw money at the problem then. Well it hasn't worked the last 7/8 years anyhow..
Surely between player sales and freed up wages, we will have some extra cash, but we actually need to be smart and not piss away 50m on every single player. I hated this ridiculous idea of a "marquee signing" every damn window like Woodward wanted, while we passed up the chance to sign genuine players that could have improved us without breaking the bank.
Let's try and get the managerial appointment right for a change. Then we can focus on the profile of team we want to build. That's priority number 1 and 2. Then recruitment comes into it. You don't start to build the house before you have the designs drawn out.
While your conclusion is spot on, the point you made is contradictory. Going from one extreme to another.OK so we can't throw money at the problem then. Well it hasn't worked the last 7/8 years anyhow..
Surely between player sales and freed up wages, we will have some extra cash, but we actually need to be smart and not piss away 50m on every single player. I hated this ridiculous idea of a "marquee signing" every damn window like Woodward wanted, while we passed up the chance to sign genuine players that could have improved us without breaking the bank.
Let's try and get the managerial appointment right for a change. Then we can focus on the profile of team we want to build. That's priority number 1 and 2. Then recruitment comes into it. You don't start to build the house before you have the designs drawn out.
I don't think Brozovic would come here honestly, but if we miss out on the CL and need to sell to buy, there are worse ideas than selling Maguire for 30M, getting Tarkowski on a free and using the money to address other needs.There is more than enough free agents this summer to do a rebuild on the cheap, anyone would be an upgrade on McGuire even tarkowski, brozovic and Kamara would instantly upgrade our midfield and there is a whole lot of decent players with a year left on the contract.
The other side of that coin is what manager would consider joining under those terms?Throwing money at yet more players isn't the answer. We need leadership both on and off the pitch.
If Xavi can work with limited transfer budget and wages, so should the new manager. The issue is the expectation of the board, the fans, and the Neville/Keane/Rio Pundits.So the new manager get punished for the higher up previous mistake? Creative way to persuade new manager to join...
Clearly money oriented. Missing CL next season, but if there is chance to complete a title challenge team, why you would not spend now, and spend less in 2023 summer? Football club should have football vision to follow, no?
When they appointed RR as interim manager, they didn't account for this scenario? I meant almost nobody should expect RR, and as an interim manager to guarantee top 4. This team was not built for him, and he's more of laying the foundation than result oriented type of manager.
If true, it's just businessmen shifting the blame, to preserve their cut. And seems like there is a social engineering effort to condition fans for a long rebuild.
Yes I think this team need rebuild, but the point remains that getting the right player when available should not be restricted by a budget set by those who created this mess in the first place.
We are in dire straits, a flawed squad with rotten attitudes on scandalously huge contracts making it near impossible to move on from them. We have a long road ahead and I guess, even if it's forced, it makes sense to slow down on the spending and introspect.The spending will slow down at some point and there has to be cost cutting on wages. Whether our budget will drop as low as £50m I’m not sure.
Reality is if you can’t recruit we’ll you will waste money whatever your budget, post SAF we are the perfect example. If we offloaded some dross, added those funds to a more modest budget we could still come back stronger next season but I imagine we’ll make a huge mess of buying and selling as usual.
For however bad the situation at Barcelona, they have a foundation of football philosophy. Laporta knows how to run that club, and they still have senior players from their successful time. Then La Liga is very different than PL. Even with the demand to lower their wage bill, Barcelona is not losing out to other La Liga teams that not has Madrid in the name.If Xavi can work with limited transfer budget and wages, so should the new manager. The issue is the expectation of the board, the fans, and the Neville/Keane/Rio Pundits.
Which part is contradictory?While your conclusion is spot on, the point you made is contradictory. Going from one extreme to another.
We made expensive mistake not because we only sign expensive superstars, and ignoring cheaper alternative. It's more down to the issue that we lack the structure, and a vision. We can't identify the right players, and have no alternative if our main targets are too expensive. Managerial change leaves a big rebuild job because previous managers don't build toward a long term vision, and the new manager require a big change for his own ideas. This leaves in desperate situation for example where we have to overpay for Maguire who should never cost that much.
Almost all long term successful teams are among the biggest spenders. So the issue is not spending money, however big, it's. Liverpool made 2 previous world record signings for their positions which became the core their successes in VVD and Allison. Spending smart maybe inclusive with spending big too. The difference is having an clear vision which requires competency from positions above the manager/head coaches. Those people are responsible for manager appointment and most of the transfer dealings, which leave the manager freedom to coach the team.
Our two main targets seem to be Pochettino and Ten Haag. They don't/didn't have massive budgets at Spurs and Ajax respectively.Sure but I doubt our managerial targets will be excited by the idea of taking on a club with huge expectations which is slashing transfer budgets and getting schooled by its rivals.