Daydreamer
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,370
- Supports
- Arsenal
If a rape allegation is substantiated, then no, I don’t see a difference between whether the incident in question took place while the player was contracted to the club or not. United have a player with active legal proceedings due to a rape allegation as the face of the club. The lawsuit was filed last season and is currently being appealed.You don't see a difference in something that happened years ago when the player had nothing to do with the club, which has already gone through extensive legal proceedings, and something that happened this summer while your player was on holidays, and he's just strolled back into the team as if nothing has happened, because your backups are crap?
My intention was to clarify the likely reason for Donaldo’s post and explain the legal reasons why clubs rarely suspend players accused of serious crimes.
This fact makes me uncomfortable. Arsenal’s current situation makes me uncomfortable. You keep stating that I’m happy about the situation as long as Arsenal are winning. That is not something I’ve said, nor is it something I believe. Quite the opposite, in fact. You know nothing about me, nor things my friends and family have experienced that affect my feelings on the matter.
Personally, this is not the type of subject that I would use to try and score points in a discussion with a stranger over the internet.