fallengt
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,618
sell him in Jan.
All true, but you need to understand the context. We ain't expected to win the midfield battle against these teams given Pogba is out and the system we employ made us being outnumbered in midfield. Mkhi's less burdened to track back and do a real midfielder role. He is not not relied to be creative force. He is just the support for the forward so we can match opposition defense number with our runners. Mikhi simply failed. We can't play on the ground via Mkhi. We played long and Mkhi is nowhere close to get the second ball or even present to receive an out pass from our corned forwards.I think it's really important to highlight that very few of our attackers are performing to standard, Lukaku, Rashford, Henrikh, Mata, Martial: They've all been underwhelming since the last international break really.
Attackers can't gain confidence when they don't attack. They need to have the ball, they need to work the ball in the final third. We don't work the ball around in the final third.
Today Chelsea attacked and Hazard had a good chance but shot straight at De Gea, De Gea lumped it up to Lukaku who couldn't control and Chelsea attacked again this time with Phil Jones intercepting the attack on the edge of our box, Phil Jones lumped it up to Lukaku who couldn't control it and Chelsea attacked after a bit of keep ball they scored.
That clearly doesn't work.
I've been trying to be fair to him. But my goodness he is so frail. Not even Half the mental fortitude of Mata.Another bottler! The guy has zero strength for this league.
Ibra will come back and be worse than before when he missed so many sitters.We need a better creative player instead of Mata and Mkhitaryan. Where has Gomes gone, is he worth trying in some games. Gawd, we also miss Pogba. Ibra back in 6/7 weeks will shake us up. Hope he is back for City on 10th dec.
I can't argue that Henrikh hasn't been the worst performer in a few games now, but I'm really not seeing enough from the others, Lukaku and Rashford especially. Lukaku got some praise today from Neville for his attitude, but he did very little bar what you mentioned and a few runs; must also be said the team didn't offer him a chance to do much else. This is also the case for Henrikh, but no he wasn't close to the second balls, we rarely won the first ball anyway. Chelsea did extremely well to recover the ball and we were not a threat at all from the long game.All true, but you need to understand the context. We ain't expected to win the midfield battle against these teams given Pogba is out and the system we employ made us being outnumbered in midfield. Mkhi's less burdened to track back and do a real midfielder role. He is not not relied to be creative force. He is just the support for the forward so we can match opposition defense number with our runners. Mikhi simply failed. We can't play on the ground via Mkhi. We played long and Mkhi is nowhere close to get the second ball or even present to receive an out pass from our corned forwards.
Lukaku & Rashford ain't performing great given these difficult circumstances, but you can still see they're being themselves in certain situation: Lukaku found space to pull dangerous shot. Rashford lost his mark... Mkhi failed at individual level by not even doing anything right.
The thing is even in other games where, Lukaku, Rashford, Young... you name it, did well individually in recent games, Mkhi still stood out like a sore thumb. It has been the individual problem in particularly for Mkhi. He's a liability.I can't argue that Henrikh hasn't been the worst performer in a few games now, but I'm really not seeing enough from the others, Lukaku and Rashford especially. Lukaku got some praise today from Neville for his attitude, but he did very little bar what you mentioned and a few runs; must also be said the team didn't offer him a chance to do much else. This is also the case for Henrikh, but no he wasn't close to the second balls, we rarely won the first ball anyway. Chelsea did extremely well to recover the ball and we were not a threat at all from the long game.
Henrikh deserves criticism, but he's just another under performing player, and that's something that runs through the whole team, but is easier seen in the attack. The way we set up, and the way the team is playing is not helping anyone in the attack right now which is why whoever plays there, they aren't doing well enough.
I thought you want PulisicI'm not one to kneejerk but he should leave in summer if he doesn't improve. And I dont think he will improve. And never buy from Dortmund again.
Perišić.I thought you want Pulisic
Perisic was former Dortmund playerPerišić.
Yeah but now he's at Inter. I meant directly from Dortmund.Perisic was former Dortmund player
Guiltytbh, ever since we signed him I thought people were overrating his ability. He is a very good player, worthy of playing for our club but if you're gonna expect more I just don't think he has that ability in him.
That's why I am satisfied with his ability.
For me a Kagawa type player would have been ideal at #10 today. He used to make sure he had bags of space around him and the ball was always away before anybody got anywhere near him. We needed somebody to link midfield, attack and wing backs today. Mikki didn't do it.Puzzling signing. I follow the buli quite a bit and all though he had a good season he was always going to be like kagawa here. Too frail and not good enough to compensate for it.
If someone has been absent for 7 games on the trot i would call them consistent even though terrible but still consistent, i think we need to stop criticizing the player and criticize the man who has kept picking him for those 7 games.Miki is terribly inconsistent, you cant have your most creative player absent for 7 games on the trot. I feared this problem with him last season and while he helped us win the EL he certainly disappeared for long spells in the league just like he is doing now.
Valid point.If someone has been absent for 7 games on the trot i would call them consistent even though terrible but still consistent, i think we need to stop criticizing the player and criticize the man who has kept picking him for those 7 games.
Agree. I rewatched few of his matches for us in the previous year and he was quite good under pressure too. Very different from the Mkhi we are seeing here. He was almost (but not quite) Hazard like.The worst thing about him is he is a confidence player. Once things get tough he form wise mentally folds. That is why he is suddenly so weak on the ball. Bulk isn't even the issue. Its entirely mental with him.