You do not keep an underperforming manager even if we have shit people at the top. Yes this has been the cycle - sacking and hiring managers constantly but like I said the Glazers aren't going anywhere and I actually think this cycle is the only way we will see positive change. At some point in this hiring and sacking of managers cycle one of two things will happen, either we stumble upon a Manager that turns things around or we finally get a DoF after repeated failure.
That poll is asking whether we should sack Ole, not whether Poch is better qualified than he is................... ??It's also redundant because, while the thread is obviously going strong, most people have forgotten about the poll and very few people will be bothering to update their choices on it.
Why don't you put up a poll with the title: "Which manager has the better CV: Ole or Poch?". See if more than 1% is stupid enough to think it's Ole.
Ed should go. He's made so many mistakes. And his single biggest mistake was giving Ole a permanent deal 3 months before he had to make a decision on it, purely because of some reactionary idiots in the media clamouring for him to.
That poll is asking whether we should sack Ole, not whether Poch is better qualified than he is................... ??
Why don't you put up a poll with the title: "Which manager has the better CV: Ole or Poch?". See if more than 1% is stupid enough to think it's Ole.
Ed should go. He's made so many mistakes. And his single biggest mistake was giving Ole a permanent deal 3 months before he had to make a decision on it, purely because of some reactionary idiots in the media clamouring for him to.
That is literally how pretty much every single football club in the world operates. You hire a manager and if you see he is not doing a good job, you sack him and move on. That's how it should be. Our managers have been sufficiently backed to at least show gradual improvement but what do we get instead? Shitshow after shitshow. Ed doesn't coach or pick the team, his biggest mistake is hiring clearly wrong managers. We should stop pretending we are some kind of special club and can win stuff with any mediocre manager as we are not. We made a mistake with Ole, sack him and find a new one. Maybe we will get lucky, maybe not. Still worth a shot rather than do feck all and watch us being a laughing stock week after week.
Weren't you happy with Jose ? Weren't you happy with Ole ? Weren't you happy with LVG ?
How do you measure success? Winning league cups and Europa league trophies? Or dominating the premier league and winning the champions league. This is what we should be aiming for. Do you think Ole can give us this?
If you are talking about other details, I have plenty more to add. My response was very specific to managerial appointments though.
For a start, each appointment had no planning involved, evidenced by the fact every manager we have had follows a different footballing philosophy.
Neither will Ole but do continue to beat that dead horse 5 years from now when we're even shitter than we are.
Ole isn't unproven like Arteta Lampard and Zidane and I don't know why people think this. He's been managing for 10years. I don't even know what you mean by the bolded bit. If Klopp wanted to come here you wouldn't take him because we've tried proven winners before and it didn't work? Anyways this doesn't answer my question. I don't know if you are an Ole outer or whatever but do you think we can dominate the premier league with Ole beating the likes of City Liverpool and Chelsea to the title within 38 matches or face the likes of Bayern Barcelona Juve etc and come out in top winning the champions league with Ole?
My post is entirely based on facts while yours is pure assumptions. Just feel free to prove me wrong with data.
