“Today was as bad as it gets,” he said. “How we didn’t win, I have no idea. It’s goals that count. You can have as much possession as you like … Even when it was 2-1 and they put five minutes (of added time) up Fulham never came up the pitch, they left us with the ball. So it was nearly a case of just playing out time and we gave away a diabolical second goal. If we had one failing it was that we should have gone to win 3-1. You could use maybe mental softness that we didn’t see the job out and get the job done. I would agree with that … It was never one (way of attacking) … If you’re just going to look at the stats and think about the crosses you need to think about the number of passes and I don’t think we just went out and crossed the ball. Some people might say that one of the things that Manchester United do is play with width and cross the ball, that’s in the genes here.”
Got that from RoM - I hadn't seen or read the bolded part any place else but, if it's what he said, and he truly believes we tried to play in a manner that didn't involve getting the ball on the sides and trying to put it in dangerous areas - then I need to rethink my position on supporting his continued tenure.
I was probably one of the only ones yesterday that was like "Ok, I can see why he hasn't tried to get them to play through the middle because they've overloaded the central areas, so the better option was to attack from the sides".
The only variation other than that was a few balls over the top for RVP and Rooney to try get behind but, those were only a few. I can't think of a single moment where we tried to even once play with the likes of Rooney, RVP, Mata, Young and any of the CM with quick shorter passing through the middle.
Is he talking about the passes it took to get the ball out to a crossing position? Because ultimately that is all our passing was about, getting players in a position to cross the ball, there was no intent in our passing to try play through their packed defense in the box.