Let me get this straight. I have a conversation with Robbie about this video for which you quote me. I then ask you to qualify what he did in this video, because that's what I and Robbie were discussing, and you get sarky and list a load of things that he could get disciplined that are completely unrelated to this video. So I ask you again what he's getting called up for in this video, and then you pivot to 'WEST HAM VIDEO' which is completely unrelated to this thread and more specifically the post I made for which you quoted. You understand how threads work, yes? You haven't mentioned the WEST HAM VIDEO to me several times. If you can't handle more than one conversation at a time without getting confused then don't bother.
Eh? For the 3rd time I have had to outline I've not said sacked. The post you are responding to has not implied sacking, nor at any point have I implied you've said he would be sacked. Why do you keep prattling on about it?
You can assume it if you like, youve imagined assumed everything else in this thread. No there isn't. But you can't discipline someone over something just because you don't like it. There has to be justification for it, otherwise you'll get your arse sued to high heaven. That's why I keep asking you to specify what he would be specifically disciplined for. But through either a poor comprehension of English, a misinterpretation of this conversation, a lack of understanding of the constructs of how threads work, or sheer stupidity, you still haven't qualified specifically what he would be disciplined for in this video. I suggest after your beer with the Ladz you might want to reread the flow of our conversation and accept what a dick you've been throughout, and realise dropping in WEST HAM VIDEO midway through the conversation doesn't magically change what was said before it.
Have fun and try to keep your clothes on.