1. Dodging the questions are we? What good will another temporary appointment do? And please stop cherry picking stats to fit your narrative. That's what shitty tabloid papers do to create headlines
2-3. The table is up to date. And while a 46% win rate is bad we have (on paper) some fairly easy fixtures coming up. Say we win 4 of those and suddenly his win percentage is above 50 again. Klopp only had a 43% win rate in his first season for reference. The thing is, just comparing win percentages, and especially cherry picking stats is senseless without context. Moyes took over a team that walked the league the season before and he followed the greatest manager of all time. Ole took over a club in complete meltdown with a patchwork squad he had no hand in creating.
4. Our defensive record is much, much better. Last season we conceded on average 1.6 goals pr game, this season its down to 0.6. Also, consider that we are only 9 games into the season and we have already played 5 of the current top 6 teams + Wolves away which is always tough. Yes, getting 1 point from West ham, Newcastle and Soton away is fecking miserable, but which such a thin squad and 3-4 of your first XI players injured we were bound to get some rough results
Having Martial and Pogba injured at the same time and then having Rashford hitting a terrible patch of form has not exactly helped either
1. What a temporary appointment will do? I think it's pretty obvious - better results, improve some players, better coaching, instill some fresh new idea, even for a short period.
2-3. How can that table be still up to date, considering we have 4 draws and 3 losses alone this season? Say, if and buts doesn't really work well so far does it? If you haven't noticed we have lost points in the exact "easy fixtures" that you count as won. If you use the context to suit your agenda then what part has had Ole in the initial success run? Let me get this straight - he just arrived, went on an unbeaten run with Jose's team, which is shite - the full credit goes to him. Then when he was actually adjusted to the job and given the permanent role we use all sorts of excuses to relieve him from all the responsibility of the barren run, is that correct?
And no Klopp comparisons don't work. Klopp was a world class manager before going to Pool. Ole was and still is a nobody in management who took down Cardiff and is close to doing the same with United.
4. We have conceded in 7 out of the last 9 matches in PL this season alone. Yes it's better than last year, but it's normal considering we spent 130m on two defenders?
Having no backup option for those injured players is also on him, because that was part of the plan, coming from the interviews wasn't it?
That thin squad also was him overseeing the clearance without replacing players.
I don't get it - you want United to do well or Ole to do well? Since when many started to put Ole instead of United's best interest?
Are you happy with the club close to relegation zone after 9 games since decades?