Sorry, Phil Bardsley.....not Gibson. You must have seen the video in Rooney's kitchen?Details please?!
Sorry, Phil Bardsley.....not Gibson. You must have seen the video in Rooney's kitchen?Details please?!
I'm doing the equivalent of sitting at the pub in front of the quizzer chatting shit over a pint with the lads around the table. I'm not a paid pundit who's quotes are being recycled by newspapers and printed for consumption.Do you have any credentials to discuss football in the first place? Because this is what you are basing your arguments on. Also, he base his argumentation on what he sees when watching Rooney, not using scientific facts or BMI factors.
Well said, people quite easily forget that LVG used 12 forward players as a single striker or part of a two. (Rooney, RVP, Will Keane, Powell, Falcao, Di Maria, Young, Fellaini, Wilson, Chicharito, Rashford, Martial) Surely that is enough to signal the sirens that something is not right with the way the boss wanted the striker(s) to play. It wasn't that Rooney was just plain shite up front, Van Gaal kept categorically stating that Rooney was doing exactly what he wanted him to do. It is a completely different scenario for being shite for the sake of it, people kept saying "Why is he not running in behind at all.." because that was not in the tactical MO. Van Gaal had to literally sub a player to get us tactically to run in behind more, he could have just asked whoever it was to just do it. Don't forget he dropped Rashford for not staying up front enough as well.They didn't, though - to reasonable people. LVG's problems went far beyond Rooney. You could argue - for the sake of argument - that from LVG's perspective he would have been better off getting rid of Rooney and replacing him with some sort of talisman (one with plenty of goals in him and an ability to create something from nothing), rather than banking on Rooney having a grand season (within his - LVG's - specific system, that is).
That's painful to watch.
That touch in the third clip
Nobody is saying that he was/is the only problem for the last 3 years under Moyes and LVG. What is unanimously agreed upon is that we are/were lacking goals, control in the attacking 3rd and creativity and he happens to be in the pivotal position where the majority of that should come from.Before last season I said that LVG would drop Rooney if his performances looked like costing him his job.
They didn't, though - to reasonable people. LVG's problems went far beyond Rooney. You could argue - for the sake of argument - that from LVG's perspective he would have been better off getting rid of Rooney and replacing him with some sort of talisman (one with plenty of goals in him and an ability to create something from nothing), rather than banking on Rooney having a grand season (within his - LVG's - specific system, that is).
But most of us would agree that LVG's specific system wasn't working - and **you'd have to be pretty blinkered in order to conclude that Rooney was the cause of that.
I'm saying something similar now: If Rooney isn't up to scratch, Mourinho will drop him. He knows what's at stake. Bringing up Ivanovic or whatnot as precedents isn't germane. Ivanovic was an off-form player he could have gotten away with - system wise - if the system itself had worked. Rooney is completely different. If he stinks, it will affect the team's performances markedly even if the machinery as such is sound - and it could very likely cost us points. Mourinho counts on Rooney for tangible contributions (goals, not least), and he won't risk his reputation on playing someone who can be replaced.
And unlike LVG, Mourinho has good alternatives. He can replace Rooney from within the current squad, and still field a strong XI - provided that his system works.
Honestly that is so bad it's unreal. It's as if we were short and asked one of the fans if they fancied a game.
Looks like a pub player in this clip
Look at the ball just bounce of him like a brick wall in that third clip 09.31.
looks like a pub player who had just come out of the pub. Murphy must have been in there with him if he thought he was wonderful.Looks like a pub player in this clip
Sometimes I feel for him.
Absolutely disgraceful "performance".
He's so obviously finished it's painful. Can't believe he's become such a big problem at our club, and it's largely ignored outside of our fanbase. Journalists and pundits still talk about him as if he's up there with Ronaldo. Never have I seen a player live off a reputation to this level.
Slightly ironic claim to make in a thread where the OP is an article by a pundit tearing him to shreds.He's so obviously finished it's painful. Can't believe he's become such a big problem at our club, and it's largely ignored outside of our fanbase. Journalists and pundits still talk about him as if he's up there with Ronaldo. Never have I seen a player live off a reputation to this level.
It's kind of amazing that this is the same player who was once known for his energetic, powerful football.
While not wanting to defend him, that is cherry picked for his worst moments. I'm sure we could cherry pick Zlatan's worst from that game - he gave the ball away a few times. Rooney did score, but that's not in the video. It would be better to present the facts as they are and let people make their minds up.
All he had was that goal. He didn't create for others, dribble past players, or anything really.While not wanting to defend him, that is cherry picked for his worst moments. I'm sure we could cherry pick Zlatan's worst from that game - he gave the ball away a few times. Rooney did score, but that's not in the video. It would be better to present the facts as they are and let people make their minds up.
Maybe, but you can't see that from that video.All he had was that goal. He didn't create for others, dribble past players, or anything really.
My word. This is even worse than I remember.
Paul Parker doesn't count. Every time I see him mentioned serves as a reminder that he even exists. I want to see him called out by Neville, Carragher, Redknapp, Shearer, etc.Slightly ironic claim to make in a thread where the OP is an article by a pundit tearing him to shreds.
Also.
There's a full clip of all his touches in the game in his performance thread, not much difference.Maybe, but you can't see that from that video.
The worst part is that he doesn't look to give a feck on any of those misses, and they are so so bad!
To show the truth? He did make those touches, right? He truly and really is that abysmal a lot of the time now.That video has an agenda.
Your sarcasm detector needs an update.To show the truth? He did make those touches, right? He truly and really is that abysmal a lot of the time now.
Crikey, that was, unbelievably, even worse.There's a full clip of all his touches in the game in his performance thread, not much difference.
If you guys think this video is bad wait till someone makes one of the Leicester game.
I will get my technicians working on it right away!Your sarcasm detector needs an update.
See, who says he can't impress anymore?Crikey, that was, unbelievably, even worse.