We got it wrong for a number of reasons
cc> Unfortunately I have to disagree with you on almost every line. Hope you don't find this too offensive. But argument is argument.
(1) Tactics were wrong. As discussed in my previous post, the long ball strategy didnt work and is monotonous. Irritating to watch it continuously happen without success and Mourinho's insistence to keep trying it.
cc> Long ball strategy worked against Chelsea last season. It is ugly to watch but don't judge Mourinho on his tactics. As long as it works, which scored us the equaliser, remember, then it was working
(2) Mata should have started. Given City's players' pace negates our own guys e.g. walker, delph, sane v rashford, martial, lukaku, it was always going to be a piece of creative flair that was required to open up the city defence. Mata showed he has the capability with a deft over the top ball from inside the city penalty area that nearly led to a goal.
cc> Mata should NEVER started. Mata is too slow on the ball, taking his time too much, weak on defensive duties, slow. Somehow Mata had gone backward this season with so many bad pass, which would have presented with too many counter-attack opportunities.
With the exception of Silva & normally De Bruyne (who had a poor game by his normal standards), I dont believe City are better than us man to man. You could hardly argue sane , , sterling or jesus is better than martial, rashford and lukaku and we have a better goal keeper than defence.
cc> Yes, that was my point. Sane, Sterling or Jeses might have plenty of ball but never presented real threats, compared with Arsenal game. That was my point in another thread. We contained De Bruyne and Silva to a certain extent, they have possession but no clear shot on target.
Lukaku is a good striker. He has lacked confidence in recent weeks to a goals drought but if you looks at the reasons by the goal drought happened , primarily a lack of service , then he cannot be vilified.
cc> Lukaku is low on confidence alright. He remind me of Andy Cole, who always need 5 chances before he will have 1 shot on target. Lukaku got away with his poor finishing during early part of the season, as he missed so many early opportunities. He managed to score the 3rd or 4th goal eventually, to somehow cover up his early failures. He has a lot of work to do, just don't blame others on services. In big games you only get 1-2 chances, this is the difference between good striker Vs great striker.
Had the aforementioned changes been employed, a more offensive tactical approach and mata starting, we could have given them a better game?
cc> Did Everton employ offensive tactical approach? Don't think so. Tactics and approach is different between Utd and Everton, but Everton was and is, never offensive. It is the price tag, the pressure, and expectation that is costing him, and us.
who agrees or disagrees?