Potential Matic Replacements

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,594
Location
Birmingham
No, he couldn't.
He doesn't have defensive awareness and ability. Especially for a DM/number 6.

Hannibal reminds me of Grealish.
It would be foolish to use him as a CDM or CM, for that matter. He has a lot to learn defensively. Though he has a motor, I can't say he's lazy. But he just lacks this defensive nous.

I'd be thrilled to see him as a left-sided attacker against Wolves. At least for 20-30 minutes.
I agree. In a 4231, you need to be defensively sound. We've ponced around with Pogba playing in a pivot for so long, and whilst he's had good games there, we bought him because of the performances he showed for Juventus playing as a left-sided midfielder.

Hannibal, as you said, should play further up.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Haha, you can't keep changing your mind. I do tend to agree, though.

I think in McTominay and Fred, we have ball winners. Not the greatest when compared to some but they'd certainly fall into that category more than the playmaker type. Therefore, I personally believe we should have been always targeting a ball-playing midfielder.

I look at the role Kante plays for Chelsea in a pivot next to Jorginho, or even the one he played next to Drinkwater. A box to box ball-winner type, if you want. Fred could certainly perform that role for us but he just needs that playmaker behind like Koop, Locatelli, K.Phillips, etc.
Tbh with you mate, my mind has to change as things evolve in our team.

Last season the consesus was that Pogba was gonna be the ball playing midfielder from a deeper role and pairing him up with someone who had the ability to defend and cover ground to a high level was the way to go IMO. Koopmeiners doesn't have the mobility IMO to play next to Pogba, hence me not wanting him for the role, because Pogba himself isn't the most mobile.

Tbh with you what we need is both midfielders in a two man midfield to help defensively and offensively. So if the opposition is attacking down our right side, then the RCM needs to shuttle across to the right, whilst the LCM drops into the central area. But our biggest issue is the build up phase, where I believe we're not good enough on the ball. So bringing one midfielder into the fold who is good on the ball, would really help us become a better team and make our attack potent. But it would also help if that new midfielder is mobile IMO and has a tenacious side.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,944
Tbh with you mate, my mind has to change as things evolve in our team.

Last season the consesus was that Pogba was gonna be the ball playing midfielder from a deeper role and pairing him up with someone who had the ability to defend and cover ground to a high level was the way to go IMO. Koopmeiners doesn't have the mobility IMO to play next to Pogba, hence me not wanting him for the role, because Pogba himself isn't the most mobile.

Tbh with you what we need is both midfielders in a two man midfield to help defensively and offensively. So if the opposition is attacking down our right side, then the RCM needs to shuttle across to the right, whilst the LCM drops into the central area. But our biggest issue is the build up phase, where I believe we're not good enough on the ball. So bringing one midfielder into the fold who is good on the ball, would really help us become a better team and make our attack potent. But it would also help if that new midfielder is mobile IMO and has a tenacious side.
Good point. We need all-rounders for the pivot.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,331
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
No, he couldn't.
He doesn't have defensive awareness and ability. Especially for a DM/number 6.

Hannibal reminds me of Grealish.
It would be foolish to use him as a CDM or CM, for that matter. He has a lot to learn defensively. Though he has a motor, I can't say he's lazy. But he just lacks this defensive nous.

I'd be thrilled to see him as a left-sided attacker against Wolves. At least for 20-30 minutes.
I see him as an 8 or a left winger/Bruno rotation.
 

BenitoSTARR

One Minute Man
Scout
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
13,571
@Walters_19_MuFc To be fair to @Adnan sometimes people spot what we need a bit later than others.

It happens but at least he’ll hold his hands up when his opinion changes so respect to him for that.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
True but the manager is trying to keep a job that he is in no way qualified for, so he doesn't have the luxury of taking chances and letting kids learn on the job. I think that also leads to the lack of rotation and running some players into the ground.

And the fans are different from Dortmund also. They have no expectations for winning things so they can let a handful of teenagers play each week, it won't really matter because they aren't going to catch Bayern anyway. United fans don't have the patience for long-term squad and player development. It happened this year with one of the most naturally gifted teenagers I've ever seen! Mason struggled at times and I remember seeing calls to send him on loan so he can learn and blah blah.
Mejbri was a midfielder at Monaco and from the games I watched, he was deployed as a LCM in a 4-3-3, and was their playmaker. But he also had the work rate off the ball which helped defensively. If Solskjaer changed the formation to a 4-3-3, then that would be ideal to give him games. And that formation would suit us best imo, if we want to develop the likes of Mejbri and Garner. Also that formation change to 4-3-3, could also suit the squad as whole.
 
Last edited:

reddevilz007

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
1,815
For the price quoted for Rice, I would rather get Locatelli and Bissouma, and play them in double pivot.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,240
I no longer really have any idea what to do here, I think McT and Fred to an extent do the job they are tasked to do but both have short comings. To me it seems like Fred is instructed to get in behind and protect the space behind Shaw of Shaw is upfield. However it doesn’t seem like McT has the same job on the other side as he seems quite standoffish and prefers to drop in to a CB position. These things however seem like important parts of our game plan and when Matic plays he does similar but he often just stays in as a LCB or doesn’t get out as quick as Fred.

I’m not 100% convinced by Rice but I do think if say we can only get 1 midfielder in he’d probably be an upgrade on McT, just not a 60 mil worth upgrade. I just think we need someone with energy who can pass and read things defensively but for the life of me I can’t think of someone who fits that bill.

DeJong, Saul maybe? I think he’ll stick by Fred for the energy for another season.

Everyone now seems to be more specialized, and not really capable of going both ways which is what I think Ole wants. I just feel like he’ll stick to his 2 pivots which gets complicated as I don’t see now really how you play Rashford and Pogba with Bruno other than 433 and to me Bruno and Pogba can’t do that as neither are great in possesion.
 

-Supreme-

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
2,447
Mejbri was a midfielder at Monaco and from the games I watched, he was deployed as a LCM in a 4-3-3, and was their playmaker. But he also had the work rate off the ball which helped defensively. If Solskjaer changed the formation to a 4-3-3, then that would be ideal to give him games. And that formation would suit us best imo, if we want to develop the likes of Mejbri and Garner. Also that formation change to 4-3-3, could also suit the squad as whole.
What formation did Solskjaer deploy at Molde?

I don't think Bruno suits playing deep as he's too clumsy with his passing at times, he's best deployed higher up the pitch imo.
 
Last edited:

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,589
No, he couldn't.
He doesn't have defensive awareness and ability. Especially for a DM/number 6.

Hannibal reminds me of Grealish.
It would be foolish to use him as a CDM or CM, for that matter. He has a lot to learn defensively. Though he has a motor, I can't say he's lazy. But he just lacks this defensive nous.

I'd be thrilled to see him as a left-sided attacker against Wolves. At least for 20-30 minutes.
This is all hypothetical so I should probably ignore it, but you're saying this incredibly talented 18 year old couldn't learn to be a Carrick/Pirlo type if he played a full season there with the reserves? I'm not guaranteeing it would work or anything, but I think there is at least a possibility. He likes to be on the ball and isn't afraid to receive it with his back to goal or under pressure, he has a great range of passing and vision, and as you said he has a motor and isn't afraid to get stuck in.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
What formation did Solskaer deploy at Molde?

I don't think Bruno suits playing deep as he's too clumsy with his passing at times, he's best deployed higher up the pitch imo.
I know he used a 4-3-3 on a number of occasions because he had Magnus Eikrem who was comfortable playing as #10 or as a AM in a 3 man midfield.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Thanks - good to know
To play a 3 man midfield you need a DM to occupy the space, a box to box midfielder to support the attack and knit it all together, both defensively and offensively. And then you need a AM who will operate between the lines and occupy half the spaces to block passing lanes off the ball. I've seen both a destroyer and a ball player work in the deeper role, depending on the composition of the first 11.

We could try Garner in rotation with Fred in the deeper role, with Mejbri as the conduit who has the ability to control the flow as the #8, and Bruno as the most advanced midfielder.

It would take Fergie like bravery to try it though, similar to when Fergie let go of Ince, Kanchelskis and Hughes to bring through the kids.
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,240
To play a 3 man midfield you need a DM to occupy the space, a box to box midfielder to support the attack and knit it all together, both defensively and offensively. And then you need a AM who will operate between the lines and occupy half the spaces to block passing lanes off the ball. I've seen both a destroyer and a ball player work in the deeper role, depending on the composition of the first 11.

We could try Garner in rotation with Fred in the deeper role, with Mejbri as the conduit who has the ability to control the flow as the #8, and Bruno as the most advanced midfielder.

It would take Fergie like bravery to try it though, similar to when Fergie let go of Ince, Kanchelskis and Hughes to bring through the kids.
Are we talking about Hannibal replacing Pogba so we can play 433? As you would think Donny would be first option if Pogba was to leave. Bruno would also vastly need to improve his ball retention and make better runs and offers for the midfield and defence as I feel both he and Pogba really struggle with that.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,440
I don't think Bruno suits playing deep as he's too clumsy with his passing at times, he's best deployed higher up the pitch imo.

on the bolded part, Bruno in his current role as AM tasked to create chances and chip in with goals tends to attempt risky passes to the forwards but when he comes deep to collect the ball, he can easily retain possession and pass it to the FB or CB, i won't describe him as clumsy, but i can see your point if Bruno suits the 433 formation, i've never seen him play it in United.

Does anyone know how Bruno is deployed with his NT? is it same as United in a 4231?
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
How about Ruben Neves? He's got a nice mix of defensive solidity and offensive skills.
His stats (and yes I know you can't rely on these alone) suggest he has had a very good season, but he seemed a bit off the pace to me.
I like him as a player though.
 

-Supreme-

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
2,447
To play a 3 man midfield you need a DM to occupy the space, a box to box midfielder to support the attack and knit it all together, both defensively and offensively. And then you need a AM who will operate between the lines and occupy half the spaces to block passing lanes off the ball. I've seen both a destroyer and a ball player work in the deeper role, depending on the composition of the first 11.

We could try Garner in rotation with Fred in the deeper role, with Mejbri as the conduit who has the ability to control the flow as the #8, and Bruno as the most advanced midfielder.

It would take Fergie like bravery to try it though, similar to when Fergie let go of Ince, Kanchelskis and Hughes to bring through the kids.

Agreed - Ole would have done well if we end up giving proper mins to Mejbri next season, let alone him and Garner IMO.

Bruno's passing technique is too inconsistent when we need the AM to transition from a slightly deeper position than one he currently occupies in, but it would be interesting to see how he will adapt his game if we try a different system.
 
Last edited:

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Are we talking about Hannibal replacing Pogba so we can play 433? As you would think Donny would be first option if Pogba was to leave. Bruno would also vastly need to improve his ball retention and make better runs and offers for the midfield and defence as I feel both he and Pogba really struggle with that.
I'm just providing potential solutions which likely won't come to pass or be discussed on here by most.

I agree, Fernandes doesn't come across as that type of player, but there was some voices in Portugal who said he was best suited to playing as a #8.

The issue with Pogba is that with the arrival of Fernandes I don't really see how we fit him and Fernandes into the same team from a defensive POV.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Agreed - Ole would have done well if we end up giving proper mins to Mejbri next season, let alone him and Garner IMO.

Bruno's passing technique is too inconsistent when we need the AM to transition from a slightly deeper position than one he currently occupies in, but it would be interesting to see how he will adapt his game if we try a different system.
I agree.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
As far as me not wanting Koopmeiners next to Pogba in a double pivot has also been vindicated. Because playing Pogba and Koopmeiners next to each other without a Matuidi type to provide defensive balance, would've been almost as bad as Matic - Pogba due to the immobile nature of both players who require legs next to them.
 

jesperjaap

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
5,739
I think bar that season he looked totally finished, Matic has done well here, was better than I expected anyway. But "potential Matic replacements" it is a bit like "potential Pogba replacements"......do we actually even need liek for like replacements?

Matic has not played much this season, Pogba isnt a central midfielder and on the left, we already have Rashford.

For me most of the players we should be sellign this summer dont need replacing actually. Dalot, Lingard, Mata, CHong, Periera, Romero, Jones for example being the deadwood, barely an appearance between them. Thats £30-60m possibly just right there.

You could pretty much add Bailly for Mengi as barely played, Matic for Garner as barely played, James for Amad as James mainly featured on he right....and he isnt good enough, VDB for Mjebri as barely played...........thats possibly another £80m that barely needs replacing

I would argue liek for like Pogba doesnt need to be replaced as he is only effective on the left and we already have Rashford....another £60-70m

Of course numbers wise some would need replacing and we arent going to sell them all, but that is £200m worth of players that wouldnt need hugely replacing.

Rightly or wrongly (wrongly for me now) if we were selling DeGea, Henderson steps upm he only needs replacing with a number 2.

Fred WOULD need replacing as he is a regular starter in a position with little back up if we were to sell him, same for Martial if we were to sell him.

These things arent going to all happen at once if at all but the players most being touted to go this sumer, I would argue dont need replacing at all directly, there fees should be used for what needs improving in the team, which is obviously a cb, cm (or two), rw and cf.....most of those positions are ones we are unlikely to be sellign anybody that have been playing regularly, but looking to imorove upon. Improve the first eleven, get some of these starting eleven players down to squad players and clear out the deadwood. Pogba is the big sale for me without a doubt though
 

afatzp

Full Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
236
Hannibal just won the Under-23s Player of the Year. Maybe we don't need a replacement from outside but promote this most promising talent to 1st team. He has more potential than Garner in my view.
 

MyOnlySolskjaer

Creator of Player Performance threads
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
26,930
Location
Player Performance Threads
Hannibal just won the Under-23s Player of the Year. Maybe we don't need a replacement from outside but promote this most promising talent to 1st team. He has more potential than Garner in my view.
And he has nowhere near the experience Garner has gained. Hannibal's form has been up and down despite this achievement, whereas Garner has played more consistently at a better standard, Garner is also better in a deeper position.
 

Number32

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
920
As far as me not wanting Koopmeiners next to Pogba in a double pivot has also been vindicated. Because playing Pogba and Koopmeiners next to each other without a Matuidi type to provide defensive balance, would've been almost as bad as Matic - Pogba due to the immobile nature of both players who require legs next to them.
Koopmeiners is still 23 now, he was very mobile when playing against us at Old Trafford. A young Matic was very mobile too, you'll lose your mobility on the pitch at Matic's age.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
Koopmeiners is still 23 now, he was very mobile when playing against us at Old Trafford. A young Matic was very mobile too, you'll lose your mobility on the pitch at Matic's age.
He was quite poor against us at Old Trafford in a 3 man midfield against Jimmy Garner and Matic in a two. We comfortably won the game 4-0.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,635
Location
Sydney
Matic barely plays now, so it could well end up being Garner

I personally hope Garner has another good loan next year before stepping up
 

Number32

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
920
He was quite poor against us at Old Trafford in a 3 man midfield against Jimmy Garner and Matic in a two. We comfortably won the game 4-0.
AZ were playing well for 50 minutes, then collapse after the first goal. He was only 21 at the time, my point is he was very mobile playing as DM but develop himself to be a playmaker CM now and let his partners do the dirty job, that's why he runs less than playing as DM 2 years ago. But he is not naturally slow or immobile at the pitch.

If we bought him to be a DM in a 4-3-3, then I agree with you, he won't be the answer for our DM issue in a faster PL. But if Ole stick with 4-2-3-1 formation, he would be the perfect partner for McT, Fred, and Garner. He could be our 2nd playmaker after Bruno, so he may be a Pogba's replacement not Matic's. I assume Pogba and Matic are gone this summer.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,755
Location
india
Matic barely plays now, so it could well end up being Garner

I personally hope Garner has another good loan next year before stepping up
Yeah I think Garner needs more time to prove himself
 

red_de_pologne

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
3,628
Location
Warsaw, Poland
Bissouma would be great but it seems we have zero interest. Can't understand why Ole wouldn't prioritise a CDM this summer, he surely must see the limitations of McFred pivot?
 

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,589
Koopmeiners is still 23 now, he was very mobile when playing against us at Old Trafford. A young Matic was very mobile too, you'll lose your mobility on the pitch at Matic's age.
I know there are a few on here who rave about him, but I thought he looked very slow.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,748
AZ were playing well for 50 minutes, then collapse after the first goal. He was only 21 at the time, my point is he was very mobile playing as DM but develop himself to be a playmaker CM now and let his partners do the dirty job, that's why he runs less than playing as DM 2 years ago. But he is not naturally slow or immobile at the pitch.

If we bought him to be a DM in a 4-3-3, then I agree with you, he won't be the answer for our DM issue in a faster PL. But if Ole stick with 4-2-3-1 formation, he would be the perfect partner for McT, Fred, and Garner. He could be our 2nd playmaker after Bruno, so he may be a Pogba's replacement not Matic's. I assume Pogba and Matic are gone this summer.
Wouldn't be in the least bit surprised to see Pogba stay for now